Did Duchess Kate fake her pregnancy and use a surrogate mother for the royal baby?

page: 1
6
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join

posted on Jul, 27 2013 @ 05:45 PM
link   
If you look at the Duchess of Cornwall (Kate Middleton) when she and Prince William presented their son to the media you will notice that a) she still appears to be fully pregnant (faux prego belly?), b) she did not appear to gain weight in her pregnancy and c) in the presentation of the baby Prince William implied (24 hrs post birth) that this was the first time that they really got to see the baby and that they had some "catching up" to do. IF this is true that they faked the pregnancy to cover for a surrogate mother then the question is WHY? First, one of the parents could be sterile, Second, since Kate was a commoner they may have wanted the mother to be of royal (and/or illuminati blood), Third, the birth date (7/22) was important and would have probably required a C Section to be exact (1:30 probability if it was +/- 2 weeks from the due date...assuming conception date at the correct time for a 7/22 birth date) and the Duchess of Cornwall may have not consented to that plan. The 7/22 date is important for several reasons and may have been requested by the Illuminati. A) Full Moon, B) Sun entering Leo, C) Mars-Jupiter Conjunction (war planet - king planet). In addition there is some numerology with the birth date (7/22) and the wedding date (4/29). Adding the months: 4 + 7 = 11, A Master Number (double 1). Adding the days: 2 + 9 = 11 and add that to 22 (a master number so no further reduction) = 33, the highest degree in Masonry.

If this is true then perhaps we should revisit the alleged suicide by the ob-gyn nurse last December (the one that was distraught after getting caught up in a hoax phone call to the ward). Could the nurse have known something and threatened to talk and thus was silenced? This is a "conspiracy site" so your comments are welcome.

Here is a video that makes some of the physical observations:
www.youtube.com...




posted on Jul, 27 2013 @ 05:54 PM
link   
The only concern I have had with the Duchess of Cornwall is that she is so terribly thin.

Prince William seems a very normal gentle-type of man yet a fearless polo player and does a fearless and great job so somehow I just can't see him tolerating too much interference into his and his wife's life. He is Princess Diana's son and perhaps there is a line he won't tolerate to be crossed in his life. We will see as time goes by if he is marching to the tune of others though.



posted on Jul, 27 2013 @ 06:01 PM
link   
I don't want to sound overly conspiratorial but in pictures of her I thought "that is not a pregnant woman"

She had a belly but did not seem like it was really a part of her. She did not have the burdened posture and hormonal widening of features that pregnant women have. There are a lot of details about pregnant women that display they are carrying a life in them... two people in one. It shows a lot in their posture and face. She did not seem to have these characteristics.



posted on Jul, 27 2013 @ 06:05 PM
link   
Well saw a picture of her pregnant, and right now in that video you can see she still has the semi pregnant look which is natural after a baby is born, so I don't think there was a surrogate involved.

www.glamour.com...

Looks preggie to me.



posted on Jul, 27 2013 @ 06:07 PM
link   

Originally posted by CosmicCitizen
If you look at the Duchess of Cornwall (Kate Middleton) when she and Prince William presented their son to the media you will notice that a) she still appears to be fully pregnant (faux prego belly?)


Hogwash. Many women have a noticeable belly after they have given birth. It can take several weeks for the stomach to return to a more normal shape.

Kate is tall, so she carried the baby in a more discrete way than someone shorter would. I would bet big bucks that her next child will be more noticeable earlier, because the stomach muscles are not as strong (so the baby shows more).



posted on Jul, 27 2013 @ 06:08 PM
link   
Beyonce's baby has credible evidence that she had a surrogate (bending over and stomach squishing, rarely seen out in public those 9 months) but these pics would be hard to fake, nice try.







posted on Jul, 27 2013 @ 06:12 PM
link   
I prefer to think of them as in love for they have that look and am very happy for them. Love delights in all expressions of love. Not that I follow royal family stuff too much.



posted on Jul, 27 2013 @ 06:16 PM
link   
People in love still use surrogates. I'm not passing judgment on them personally, I just noticed strange things about her pictures.



posted on Jul, 27 2013 @ 06:33 PM
link   
A couple of thing's.......

It was her first pregnancy....it's not unusual at all for women to not "show" very much in their first pregnancy. In subsequent pregnancies women tend to "show" more and certainly a lot sooner.....presumably because everything as stretched before so there is a little more "give"

She is seen as a fashion icon.....clothe's that she wore during pregnancy will have been designed to be flattering rather then give you that "in your face" pregnancy look.

Eeeeerrrmmmm.....womens stomach's don't spring back to their natural shape within 24 hours after giving birth.....myself and most of the entire population of mother's could only wish!



posted on Jul, 27 2013 @ 06:35 PM
link   

Originally posted by NotAnAspie
People in love still use surrogates. I'm not passing judgment on them personally, I just noticed strange things about her pictures.


Well personally, I thought her tits got slightly bigger.



posted on Jul, 27 2013 @ 06:36 PM
link   
reply to post by Logos23
 


I agree the sooner we can grow these odd creatures called "babies" in vats the better



posted on Jul, 27 2013 @ 06:37 PM
link   
reply to post by Knobby
 


As a degree holder in that subject what we call the mammary gland I concur that you are right



posted on Jul, 27 2013 @ 06:37 PM
link   

Originally posted by cass1dy09
Beyonce's baby has credible evidence that she had a surrogate (bending over and stomach squishing, rarely seen out in public those 9 months) but these pics would be hard to fake, nice try.






This second video looks like something out of some ball/pregnant fetish porn... just saying. The looks on their faces lol



posted on Jul, 27 2013 @ 06:39 PM
link   
reply to post by cass1dy09
 


So you think those pics are real?



posted on Jul, 27 2013 @ 06:41 PM
link   
reply to post by Knobby
 


reply to post by boymonkey74
 


They were obviously implant's....all part of the deception
lol



posted on Jul, 27 2013 @ 06:53 PM
link   
Some people obviously don't have very much experience of pregnant women and the joy's of a ladie's changing pregnant body.....be grateful.....very grateful! lol

No two pregnancies are alike....and pregnant bodie's vary, they come in all shape's and size's. Some bump's small and compact, some don't even look round, some a very peculiar shape and some don't even look real! I've had a twin pregnancy....I will spare you that image!
lol



posted on Jul, 27 2013 @ 07:02 PM
link   
reply to post by boymonkey74
 


Vats are not the preferred way to nurture a babies growth, they need contact, warmth, the sound of mothers voice, and afterwards, they shouldn't be separated, but be held, snuggled, loved nonstop. Thats what is best for babes. 5 intense pregnancies that I wished some men could have experienced, but wouldn't have opted for a vat for any of them.
edit on 27-7-2013 by Unity_99 because: (no reason given)



posted on Jul, 27 2013 @ 07:42 PM
link   
My sister is around the same size and build as Kate and also quite active/fit - she hardly showed for either of her kids, yet the first was a monster when he came out, so god knows how she didn't show.

My own missus, however, is quite short and showed very early for ours and he was a big boy too. By the time it came for her to give birth, she could barely move and was like a big ball of preggy...

They all vary and I really think the OP is grasping at straws here. Anyone who knows anything about the couple know that William is very protective of his wife (and new child now, I presume). Also, saying this is the first time they can spend with the mother/child after giving birth is quite accurate. That first 24hrs in the hospital, you're surrounded by nurses, doctors and family in a non-stop stream. The first night home is the only time the couple with get together with their baby alone since the birth.

As for the belly afterwards, it takes a while to go down, if ever.... Ask any woman.



posted on Jul, 27 2013 @ 07:47 PM
link   

Originally posted by Logos23
Some people obviously don't have very much experience of pregnant women and the joy's of a ladie's changing pregnant body.....be grateful.....very grateful! lol

No two pregnancies are alike....and pregnant bodie's vary, they come in all shape's and size's. Some bump's small and compact, some don't even look round, some a very peculiar shape and some don't even look real! I've had a twin pregnancy....I will spare you that image!
lol


gee whiz, how many babies have you had exactly? Are you only going by your own experiences because observations are not allowed in these opinions?



posted on Jul, 27 2013 @ 07:54 PM
link   
reply to post by CosmicCitizen
 


Don't really care.
Second.





new topics
top topics
 
6
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join