It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by NotAnAspie
Even if she did use a surrogate, it's not THAT conspiratorial. Rich people do stuff like that. Pregnancy can take a serious toll on the body and there are many people who want children but have those reservations. It could be kept secret because there are plenty of understanding potential surrogates in the world who don't want to be hounded by British royalty... and would no doubt be taken care of in life for their services. It's really not that dastardly to think about... which of course does not mean it's true but it's certainly a possibility. Regardless, I doubt they would be that offended and probably love this type of controversy.
If you look at the Duchess of Cornwall (Kate Middleton) when she and Prince William presented their son to the media you will notice that a) she still appears to be fully pregnant
he did not appear to gain weight in her pregnancy
in the presentation of the baby Prince William implied (24 hrs post birth) that this was the first time that they really got to see the baby and that they had some "catching up" to do
First, one of the parents could be sterile
Second, since Kate was a commoner they may have wanted the mother to be of royal
would have probably required a C Section
Originally posted by Logos23
reply to post by Knobby
reply to post by boymonkey74
They were obviously implant's....all part of the deception lol
Originally posted by Unity_99
reply to post by boymonkey74
Vats are not the preferred way to nurture a babies growth, they need contact, warmth, the sound of mothers voice, and afterwards, they shouldn't be separated, but be held, snuggled, loved nonstop. Thats what is best for babes. 5 intense pregnancies that I wished some men could have experienced, but wouldn't have opted for a vat for any of them.edit on 27-7-2013 by Unity_99 because: (no reason given)
It would not be the first time that a surrogate was used by the royal family
If a woman has a narrow pelvis then a C Section may be the only alternative (otherwise why are they used at all if other less surgical methods are available?)
Also the Price could have a fertility problem and being 2nd in line to be King would not want the public stigma
Kate could have objected to carrying someone else's baby
I am that the truth will come out if this "conspiracy" is true.
Originally posted by CosmicCitizen
reply to post by OtherSideOfTheCoin
It would not be the first time that a surrogate was used by the royal family. If a woman has a narrow pelvis then a
C Section may be the only alternative (otherwise why are they used at all if other less surgical methods are available?). Also the Price could have a fertility problem and being 2nd in line to be King would not want the public stigma of being infertile and Kate could have objected to carrying someone else's baby (but ok with the surrogate route). I am that the truth will come out if this "conspiracy" is true.
Did Duchess Kate fake her pregnancy and use a surrogate mother for the royal baby?