It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by HomerinNC
Big Brother getting nervous? Looks like this town doesnt have people asleep at the wheel
WASHINGTON (AP) — People who fire guns at drones are endangering the public and property and could be prosecuted or fined, the Federal Aviation Administration warned Friday.
The FAA released a statement in response to questions about an ordinance under consideration in the tiny farming community of Deer Trail, Colo., that would encourage hunters to shoot down drones.
The administration reminded the public that it regulates the nation's airspace, including the airspace over cities and towns.
A drone "hit by gunfire could crash, causing damage to persons or property on the ground, or it could collide with other objects in the air," the statement said. "Shooting at an unmanned aircraft could result in criminal or civil liability, just as would firing at a manned airplane."
Under the proposed ordinance, Deer Trail would grant hunting permits to shoot drones.
The permits would cost $25 each.
The town would also encourage drone hunting by awarding $100 to anyone who presents a valid hunting license and identifiable pieces of a drone that has been shot down.
Storyedit on 7/20/2013 by HomerinNC because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by HomerinNC
Big Brother getting nervous? Looks like this town doesnt have people asleep at the wheel
WASHINGTON (AP) — People who fire guns at drones are endangering the public and property and could be prosecuted or fined, the Federal Aviation Administration warned Friday.
The FAA released a statement in response to questions about an ordinance under consideration in the tiny farming community of Deer Trail, Colo., that would encourage hunters to shoot down drones.
The administration reminded the public that it regulates the nation's airspace, including the airspace over cities and towns.
A drone "hit by gunfire could crash, causing damage to persons or property on the ground, or it could collide with other objects in the air," the statement said. "Shooting at an unmanned aircraft could result in criminal or civil liability, just as would firing at a manned airplane."
Under the proposed ordinance, Deer Trail would grant hunting permits to shoot drones.
The permits would cost $25 each.
The town would also encourage drone hunting by awarding $100 to anyone who presents a valid hunting license and identifiable pieces of a drone that has been shot down.
Storyedit on 7/20/2013 by HomerinNC because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by OtherSideOfTheCoin
I can actually understand this.
Regardless if you agree with drones or not, trying to shoot them out of the sky is frankly stupid.
Say you actually hit the drone and cause it to crash, next thing you know your going to be standing up in court trying to defend yourself for the murder of the 10 orphans who died with the drone you shot down crashed into the orphanage and burnt it to the ground.
So of course the FAA is going to advise against it!
Its a matter of public safety
Originally posted by HomerinNC
Big Brother getting nervous? Looks like this town doesnt have people asleep at the wheel
WASHINGTON (AP) — People who fire guns at drones are endangering the public and property and could be prosecuted or fined, the Federal Aviation Administration warned Friday.
The FAA released a statement in response to questions about an ordinance under consideration in the tiny farming community of Deer Trail, Colo., that would encourage hunters to shoot down drones.
The administration reminded the public that it regulates the nation's airspace, including the airspace over cities and towns.
A drone "hit by gunfire could crash, causing damage to persons or property on the ground, or it could collide with other objects in the air," the statement said. "Shooting at an unmanned aircraft could result in criminal or civil liability, just as would firing at a manned airplane."
Under the proposed ordinance, Deer Trail would grant hunting permits to shoot drones.
The permits would cost $25 each.
The town would also encourage drone hunting by awarding $100 to anyone who presents a valid hunting license and identifiable pieces of a drone that has been shot down.
Storyedit on 7/20/2013 by HomerinNC because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by OtherSideOfTheCoin
reply to post by th3onetruth
But what if it lands on Cheney's house?
the shoot down the next one that comes just to make sure...
I think it is safer for the public to shoot them damned things down.
its really not....
once the public start shooting at them the drones are either going to start falling on top of schools, hospitals and peoples homes and then they are going to start arming the drones and then the drones will start shooting back.
probably causing massive "collateral damage" in the process.
shooting at the drones is just pointless.edit on 20-7-2013 by OtherSideOfTheCoin because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by soulshn
Originally posted by VeritasAequitas
reply to post by HomerinNC
The FAA does realize that they must be smoking crack to think that a 12-gauge Mossberg, is going to hit an aircraft that flies in the stratosphere, right?
They are just so full of #....How about you take your military operations off of American soil, hmm? Then, us law-abiding American's would feel obligated to shoot down your little toy....
A Mossberg has a generous range of 600 ft, and that is being very generous. How high do these drones fly? A couple of thousand feet up...Defies sooooo much logic and reasoning skills; Aristotle would be ashamed.
Originally posted by Chargeit
This is retarded... It takes a grade A sniper equipped with one of the best rifles know to man to hit a target over a mile away. Now, I'm suppose to believe some redneck with his granddads ol'gun is suppose to hit a Drone 2 miles up? Bull#... Just proves lack of education in their community.
Maybe they should start teaching something other than creationism.