The Issue of Misandry – 21st Century Social Conspiracy

I'd like to post my two cents in regards to the OP and start by saying I believe in equality of all sexes.

"a socio-political mindset that encourages the hatred of men and the creation of what some would call Matriarchal society... belief that all men are bad
It is the complete opposite of Patriarchy in the sense.

The issue I have here is that because we are comfortable in a patriarchal society, that somehow a matriarchal society would be a bad thing.
Remove the part about encouraging hatred of men, and a matriarchal society could be a positive thing. It wouldn't be as good as a well-balanced society, but it does not have to be a negative thing either.

What I see the most of today is a situation where men’s culture is constantly ridiculed and looked down upon, yet women’s culture is applauded and encouraged.

I agree, I feel very uncomfortable around women who "bash" men or call them all pigs and liars. I feel the same way about men who call all women manipulative and crazy, as well. (On a personal note, my husband has a friend whose mother constantly berated men and the poor guy was very insecure with women. Thankfully, he managed to find a loving girlfriend who was nothing like her.)

As far as the T.V. and media aspect of it, my belief is it comes down to the dollar. What makes people laugh?- Joking at someone's expense. It's trendy right now for the butt of the joke to be men, however, I don't think it is a conspiracy of any sorts.

What has always been popular is military/action/comedies filled with men who are smart and funny and heroes at the end of the day. I believe that there are plenty of manly role models to be found (though personally I don't agree that we should be looking to media for our role models.)

How many products are advertised to men with the only benefit being it will make your lady happy? Sure women’s magazines have those too ..where the opposite is written by women FOR men.

Things have changed yes, there used to be ads on how to keep your man happy when he got home as well, of coarse, written back when men were the only ones out working. (I'll leave out the joke about how men always want to know what women want)
But media advertisers are sleazy anyway, they want to sell their product. However, I don't see these as the majority of ads in the magazines I read.

The problem is that the idea of a manly man or a traditionally masculine man is no longer present.

I disagree. (I'm thinking about general role of traditional male heroes in movies) Even though war is still a negative, to see a strong (guy who cares about himself and works out) soldier (who makes sacrifices for his family, nation, world etc) is still evoking a sense of pride in young boys.

Another issue within our media is the portrayal of men as being the evil doers in the world. Shows like Law and Order portray in almost every case, men as being the sole persons responsible for sexual assault and domestic violence.

Yes, but in almost every case in real life this is reality. I can think of many examples of evil women in media, as well as real life. But art sometimes imitates life and even if you don't like it, it doesn't make it not true.

As far as that double standard meme goes, even though I can't relate to those women, twilight was more than just a bunch of half naked young men walking around. It was a love story.
Men get excited to see new films as well, and if there happens to be a bunch of half naked teenage girls washing cars in one of the scenes, it's the same thing. Besides, lots of guys get excited and dressed in costume for certain movie premieres. Fanboys, fangirls, same thing - different style.

The rest of your issues I do agree with however, especially judicial laws and rulings, as things are similar in Canada. The justice systems of both countries are equally as bad and not just for gender issues but for pretty much everything.

To finish off, you might think that equality is not an issue for 1st world women= but it is definitely not. I know from direct experience.
Well, thanks for reading. I'll be honest, I usually don't check back in after posting, but feel free to respond.

reply to post by Komodo

"my wife... if she wants to spend something at the store but knows it might be out of our budget, she asks if it's ok .. 90% of the time I don't really care, but, the 10% of the time.. depending on the amount I'll tell her no and give a reason. "

" because she KNOWS there's only 1 authority in the household and her husband has the last word period. She knows there a blessing in it for her."

" From the dawn of time, MEN here always and forever shall be made to have the last decision in households and governments. "

In my household, my husband entered our relationship with thousands of dollars of debt, bills were never paid on time and he had no savings. Now, the opposite is true.
Your wife lets you handle the finances because you are better than money than she is, as I am better with money than my husband is.
It has nothing to do with the fact you have a penis or I have a vagina.

Sometimes I have the last word, sometimes he has the last word. However, just ask your wife is it a "blessing"- you might be surprised to hear the answer..

"From the dawn of time..." more like from the dawn of your imagination. Just because men have been in power for a long time, does not mean they always were. There have been plenty of matriarchal and balanced societies since the dawn of time.

reply to post by SearchLightsInc

Japan has a very sexist culture anyhow, they see their women as second class. I can only imagine that the men who reject companionship with a women are making a "statement" rather then just "lowering" themselves to their basic need for love. And dont even mention those websites as sources, the guys on there are seriously nutty, no better than the hard-line feminists.

I have a friend whose cousin married a Japanese business man. The guy my friend is American lives in America but is polish by birth. His cousin lives in Poland she went there it was a sort of arranged marriage they sort of knew each other, it lasted about a year or something, he said that she said that he was not giving her enough attention and was always away. So she left and went back to Poland were life was better. The definitions of better though would also surprise you. From what my friend said of when he went back there was that the place was a dump, and the main form of entertainment was the local coal mines, and getting stone drunk.

Japanese culture is different, in fact Japanese are different. I would not say that they are sexists, though someone like you would consider them so, and considering the kind of freaky and kinky # some parts of there culture is into I think some would consider them the aniti Christ. But in all if you ever went drinking with some of them Japanese people you would know that they work hard and party even harder, I think the normal Japanese business man does not even go home, they work, party, sleep in these spiffy hotels.

And then repeat the process all over again, if there looking for female company, well there way is a bit different. From what I heard the guy went home to his new wife at least once a week. Go figure eh! Women cant decide on what they want. But here is something to ponder, the definition of sexist changes from country to country and culture to culture, and not only by the men therein but by the women also.

reply to post by Bluesma


Thats kind of deceptive, while they may spend more on essentials and household goods. The majority are used by them or everybody in the household, and even in the toys department I do not think males buy anywhere near as that states. I know I still have the same things and toys which I have had for years and years, my main procurement right now being videogames of which even those I still play games which I bought in 2003 for 50 $ were as my sister seems to buy all kinds of junk toys for her kids which gets thrown in the garbage every few months and not to mention clothes gadgets such as cellphones and such. In fact I still wear the same clothes which I have had fore years and years, while in that time the females at least in this household and around me have probably had many and much more clothes and such.

In a way it may be right as the majority of things which are bought are dispensable household goods which are used by everyone, and such that 80% may include necessities which are not necessarily male or female defined. I really don't know how you got that men are spending 80% of the household income, unless there buying something expensive which would last them for a few years, or there just spenders or hoarder or something like that. It could happen, I just don't see it happening all that much to the dudes around my area. In fact most of them don't even shop, that's what the wife or girlfriend is for, in fact that is the first place the monthly or weekly check goes to. Both for necessities and for whatever else.

reply to post by FyreByrd

I would say that 85% of pregnancies are not planned and/or not wanted. The example you give is specific and donesn't apply. The facts (facts) are that women carry the child and are RESPONSIBLE for it for twenty years into the future. Not that men shouldn't have the same level of responsiblitity - the fact is they don't.

Throughout history - men have 'sown their seed' and then just left the woman to fend for herself and her child on her own and our modern society is no different. Marriage (for the upper classes) was supposed to address this issue through complex kinship resonsiblity rules and more but it never was meant for everyday people.

When it comes to day-to-day life - women always have to make the decisions about having and caring for a child. It an ideal world both parents would be involved throughout the life of a child but it is not the case for the majority and thinking it is does a huge disservice to children everywhere.

I think females have learned not to sleep willy nilly with every guy that passes buy. The courtship or matting rituals which they all go thorough were not invented by the upper classes a few years ago, this whole thing goes back to cavemen times, for females its pretty much ingrained in there genes. In fact emulating a subdivision in a social network ie (the upper classes) is what may have lead to the problems to begin with. People seemed to have been doing just fine for the thousands of years before marriage was invented, so why does it all fail so much now? Let me give you a clue. Your trying to fit the square piece into the triangle hole here. Devolution indeed.

Originally posted by MichaelPMaccabee

Originally posted by JiggyPotamus
There is such a double standard between men and women that it is ridiculous. And it is not just a battle of the sexes. This same double standard exists between members of different races as well. To describe what I mean, do you think it would be okay for a white person to create a white entertainment channel, or form a group focused on the advancement of white people? The same philosophy is present between the two sexes as well. And what has happened to society is described well. I have always called it the nanny-state, and it is the result of women complaining about every little thing.

Have you noticed that when something happens that men would simply shrug off, there will be some woman out there who MUST make a big deal about it. Always. And this is exactly why masculinity has disappeared to a great degree in our society. I really enjoyed reading your post, and it is in line with what I myself believe. I even learned a great deal. Good job.

Would it be okay if a white person owned Black Entertainment Television, because Sumner Redstone has been the owner of BET for years.

And that's what people don't get BET is a brand and its selling something. If you think feminism is any different you would be wrong, if it ever was something its just a brand now, and is likely owned by other pasty rich old white men. Srry but when I see feminist sites or even on this site were in feminists argue that the guy buying them the drink, is somehow insulting them. Then its like OK so you basically have no issues whatsoever beyond penis envy and some control issues. Most feminists i seen are married or have a boyfriend, and there issues are really illogical. I know were it stems from and I know were it will end. But come on, enough with the bull# already, with or without all the rhetoric the outcome will be the same.

reply to post by ThreeBears

Let's begin with OPs first about the media, etc. On THAT POINT, YOU ARE CORRECT. There IS yes, an agenda to dumb down men, HOWEVER, go back and re watch those movies and media depictions, they ALSO Over Sexualize women and children, as well as Dumb then down.

Would that not be the symptom and not the cause? If your so influenced by a movie or a show then the root cause may not quite be that.

There IS a Masculinizing females on the whole media, but if you pay closer attention, it's not the Feminine via nature, Mother role that is Empowered, Hardly, it's the WHORE IMAGE that is empowered while depicting the men as dumb down sex craved idiots. Seriously just talking TV now, excluding reality shows. And I'm going to get into the Why here in bit, but shows like Kings and Queens and Raymond, two I can think of, sorry I didn't watch a lot of TV but what I do Remember, and from what I hear from others, etc., the Women are masculized WHICH, BTW IS A FORM OF MISOGYNY, because Feminine values, such as Nurture, Gentleness, Kindness, etc are NOT VALUED, but Aggression (not assertiveness but aggression), Bullying, Physical Strength, MARTYRDOM type of crap, aka the SUPERWOMAN, all of that, is a form of MYSOGYNY while Applauding the Weak AMORAL MALE,

ya you see what I am talking about the fact that anybody actually takes this so supper serious speaks of deeper underlining problems then that they TV is influencing you. Why is a bunch of moving picture influencing you? Its just picture. If all your friends jump off a bridge do you follow them? And if your gonna speak of energies lots of females have male energies, and I seen some dudes who had female energies so much so that going by that alone you would be confused as hell on who is who if you ever meet them under a media like the internet.

Genesis, just to use as reference, terms then Serpent Seed, Using that as an analogy or metaphor, Serpents, hunt eggs and young, and they, male and female, are basically the same in nature. The DE GENDERING...is a SERPENT TRAIT. But now, Here's where many make their mistake...Misogyny, under a patriarchy, is Also the Serpent because it's about POWER and CONSUMPTION...the Anti thesis to LIFE.

Getting a little dramatic arent you. But its actually much worse then that. Many of the traits we take for female are actually male, and vice versa. But more so and importantly people assume that any one trait like care or compassion for children are only prone and prerequisite in one gender or another. Its merely a byplay of a duality it once served a function in the tribe, which was expressed differently. Woman would take care of young and lot, men hunted gathered and all that ie such thing which they both did it for the very same reasons ie offspring kids all that.

Once you separate them into two distinct traits for the sexes, well no wonder your going to be confused. The reason why patriarchy exists is because females like guys in power, it serves a function for them and has for thousands of years. So much so that for some its the only thing they know, an old instinct put into conscious, societal pressures, and even law in some of those societies. But its the instinct that drives them, and its the instinct which created all of those.

In fact the whole verbiage and way of thinking you have and they have is completely false and erroneous. As such your destined to contentiously run into problems. And likely the same old problems. And you forget even among serpents there are males and female serpents. They do not clone themselves, or split in two like amoebas now do they.

The genders serve many purpuses some very specific, if you truly degender the whole of humanity. You would have not somehow magically made them better or evolved them, you would have likely made them extinct. But saying that the same would not apply a few thousand years from now or a million, but for a majority of the time coming its there for reasons. What your confused about is merely illusions, your arguing about what clothes and attire some wear because that is a great majority of what the things we label each other are merely surface, when you should look beyond that, to what they really are like.

reply to post by smyleegrl

Most men don't commit sexual crimes. Most men are wonderful husbands and fathers, brothers and friends, who would never consider raping anyone, much less an infant. What you've done here is paint a picture of "many" men that is totally inaccurate. It's misandry, pure and simple.

Its assume most men are controlled by there basic urges and cant control even the simplest of animalistic urges. In some yes, I would say a minority, but to say that most men you have ever meat would rape there child if given the chance is plain paranoid.

And I quote.

See MANY, NOT ALL BUT MANY MEN are sex ruled, without Morality restraints, many, not all but many would rape infants, even their own, IF there was no protection of infants, etc. Talking here about the most Debased of nature, the Agenda of these sex starved porn types, is the absolute removal of Anything CONSCIOUS or that would say, you need CONSENT. These types don't give a damn about consent, ONLY THEIR LUSTS,

Even if that were the case then that would only mean that females are the enablers. It takes two to tango in everything pretty much, and has been like that for a long time. You see yourself as a victim you make yourself a victim. Besides that is what the police are for even if it came down to that, and even from them word is that most of it when they show up is either drama, or just plain whos pulling whos card.

Originally posted by SearchLightsInc
reply to post by luciddream

 

And you know what i find even more hilarious, the fact your attacking me on the feminist issue and i didnt even bring it up. Guys like yourself are more concerned with feminism then women like myself who dont even identify with the modern stands of it. You must be scared.

You give off the impression you're absolutely #ting where the movement choose's to go next, clutching your manhood while mentally clinging to the conspiracy that women's rights were a big economical set up to screw over your average man. You just cant see past your own gender can you? Are you a socio path mate? Do you care only about yourself first and very little about every one else?

You should be gratful that im even bothering to reply to you, i can feel my I.Q dropping just reading your whining dribble on this thread about how much you hate feminism yada yada yada. How the hell have your genes even made to this day? Does your family have a history of duping women into carrying your genetics on?

Talk about breeding ignorance.

Dude your freaking weird. Dont feed the trolls, believe me I know, it leads no were, I have been there, and been one. A troll that is. Its hard and thankless work but somebody has to do it. No wonder, you feminist types are so easily flustered your practically looking for a fight and the attention. One that you can win that is...And so.

Never mind me...Like totally, Carry on.

reply to post by ThreeBears

Ya well all that is a serious problem. One which has more to do with the fact that trafficking and child porn sells, and given all that all of them are merely the suppliers there not the enablers. And a lot of it is simply about the $$$. You have to ask yourself in that whole convoluted mess, who really are the enablers? Which is just saying why do they do what they do to begin with. Why is there a demand to begin with? Or is it merely one vice fuels and feeds the other. The answer would be manifold. If it were many choice it would likely be...All of the above.

reply to post by ThreeBears


That's funny, you think you are a good person but yet your posts bubble over with hatred and prejudice?

I think your posts are a perfect example of the problem.
Overgeneralized sensationalist justifications for blind hatred.

I am a really good person and have never considered raping anyone ever.
I try to take the anti-evil slant.

Great job judging the whole world before you met them (probably based off some isolated events in your own life).

Originally posted by ThreeBears

Has been erased BY PATRIARCHY-MISOGYNY for billions of years.

Your posts would make a ton of sense had you been chilled out, didn't scream, and avoided using totally ludicrous statements like this one here.

Billions of years? Really?


Calm down, relax, come back and post your thoughts slowly. Proof-read the post for mistakes.

Originally posted by MichaelPMaccabee

Are men discriminated against for being men and is there a huge disconnect between that problem and the conversation being had within our media and politics about it?

No, men are not being discriminated against by our culture at large.

Men control the media.

The heads of almost every media conglomerate are male.

Men control politics.

The vast majority of seats of political power in the United States are held by a males.

If sexism isn't the reason for this bias in a society that is roughly 50-50 male to female, then what accounts for these discrepancies?

edit on 26-6-2013 by MichaelPMaccabee because: (no reason given)

Well, I'm guessing the men who have power know that these types of ideas will never effect them. They intend to destabilize the 99% so they will be easier to control and exploit.

I was just looking into some misandry stuff and found there’s an antimisandry.com... site, so I was going to look at the forum and found this:

“Anti Misandry is currently out of action for at least the next day (until 2pm GMT) due to an on-going cyber attack and exploit. We will be back in the near future once issues are deemed safe”

But they have posted this:


It’s Stefan Molyneux discussing the Cycle of Violence – and its well worth watching

The majority of men were against it yet here we are?? Your question answered.

Yeah OK, if majority were against it the protest would have been dismantled and done with.

So you're rewriting history now to suit your wacko facts?

Why would i be scared of any thing feminine?

Good question, why are you scared of anything feminine? Maybe you just dont understand women and the basic fact that they are not second rate citizens who need to have a man's permission to live.

only problem is the feminism is so far up the justice's butt, they attack men thru unfair judicial system.

Ive already agreed in this thread that men seem to bare the brunt in the legal system. I didnt defend women on that point because i believe in EQUALITY and EQUAL TREATMENT. I just dont pick a side and stick with it even when they're wrong, im not even a feminist for gods sake

You just cant see past your own gender can you? Are you a socio path mate?Do you care only about yourself first and very little about every one else?

If modern feminist thought like this, we would not be having this conversation.

What has that got to do with the questions i asked you? You've come out all guns blazing stating that without men giving rights to women, we wouldnt have them. Guess what? Without men oppressing women, there wouldnt have ever been a feminist movement. You act like the male gender is quite literally close to breaking, anyone would think you were prisoners surrounded by tough female wardens interested only in humiliating you.

And yet, when i ask people like yourself what specifically has feminism done to men that is SO bad, i never get a clear answer. "Its made men girly, breakdown of the family, burned my toast this morning"

All bull# answers.

You should be gratful that im even bothering to reply to you?

Oh, im sorry, may i speak? so sorry for stepping on your feminist ego. Please don't go to the police, im sure they will arrest me whatever madeup reason you give them.

Well, after you insisting women should be grateful for simple rights you "gave" to us, i thought you should be grateful that im bothering to reply to you. Im not a feminist ive told you this, but you're so single minded - Anyone who contradicts you is a full blown nazi feminist who's been brainwashed to hate men!

I dont think the police arrest people for stupidity so your luck has rolled in there.

Does your family have a history of duping women into carrying your genetics on?

No, the reason im here is because my mom wasn't trying to competing with my dad to see who is the "man" of the house or the reason my parents are still together for 35 yrs, seen grandkids. My mom does not try to compete but she can shut my dad up with any arguments if she wants to.

"wasnt trying to compete with my dad"

Women are not working to compete with men. We are working because we like earning our own money, spending our own money and making our own lives. Some of us dont want to be financially looked after by someone, who will probably hold that over us when it suits them. I dont have any problem with women who want to stay at home and raise children, but at the end of the day, without feminism ever occurring women would never had the option to go out and earn their own cash. Before you start blaming feminism for the whole 2 parents having to work that was brought to you by a changing economy - Decline in well paid skilled jobs that all went abroad and a move into service based industry that favours neither men or women.

I highly doubt you would have the chance to pass your genes(unless you find some feminized man to step on), maybe its a good thing.

Wow, if all i was worth was based on how i looked i'd be devastated at your comment

Do you really think a women would have a problem finding a man to sleep with? Go on, show us all how intelligent you are and say yes


Hey Lucid, do you check under your bed at night before you sleep to make sure there's not a feminist hiding under there ready to steal your masculinity?

Originally posted by galadofwarthethird
reply to post by SearchLightsInc

 

Japan has a very sexist culture anyhow, they see their women as second class. I can only imagine that the men who reject companionship with a women are making a "statement" rather then just "lowering" themselves to their basic need for love. And dont even mention those websites as sources, the guys on there are seriously nutty, no better than the hard-line feminists.

I have a friend whose cousin married a Japanese business man. The guy my friend is American lives in America but is polish by birth. His cousin lives in Poland she went there it was a sort of arranged marriage they sort of knew each other, it lasted about a year or something, he said that she said that he was not giving her enough attention and was always away. So she left and went back to Poland were life was better. The definitions of better though would also surprise you. From what my friend said of when he went back there was that the place was a dump, and the main form of entertainment was the local coal mines, and getting stone drunk.

Japanese culture is different, in fact Japanese are different. I would not say that they are sexists, though someone like you would consider them so, and considering the kind of freaky and kinky # some parts of there culture is into I think some would consider them the aniti Christ. But in all if you ever went drinking with some of them Japanese people you would know that they work hard and party even harder, I think the normal Japanese business man does not even go home, they work, party, sleep in these spiffy hotels.

And then repeat the process all over again, if there looking for female company, well there way is a bit different. From what I heard the guy went home to his new wife at least once a week. Go figure eh! Women cant decide on what they want.

But here is something to ponder, the definition of sexist changes from country to country and culture to culture, and not only by the men therein but by the women also.

You're right on the point that the Japanese are... different

I am however interested in your last comment:

But here is something to ponder, the definition of sexist changes from country to country and culture to culture, and not only by the men therein but by the women also.

Could you give me an example of differing opinions of sexism in the world? Because as far as i know its definition is "Prejudice, stereotyping, or discrimination against someone based on their sex"

Is there different definitions globally?

Originally posted by galadofwarthethird

Originally posted by SearchLightsInc
reply to post by luciddream

 

And you know what i find even more hilarious, the fact your attacking me on the feminist issue and i didnt even bring it up. Guys like yourself are more concerned with feminism then women like myself who dont even identify with the modern stands of it. You must be scared.

You give off the impression you're absolutely #ting where the movement choose's to go next, clutching your manhood while mentally clinging to the conspiracy that women's rights were a big economical set up to screw over your average man. You just cant see past your own gender can you? Are you a socio path mate? Do you care only about yourself first and very little about every one else?

You should be gratful that im even bothering to reply to you, i can feel my I.Q dropping just reading your whining dribble on this thread about how much you hate feminism yada yada yada. How the hell have your genes even made to this day? Does your family have a history of duping women into carrying your genetics on?

Talk about breeding ignorance.

Dude your freaking weird. Dont feed the trolls, believe me I know, it leads no were, I have been there, and been one. A troll that is.

Its hard and thankless work but somebody has to do it. No wonder, you feminist types are so easily flustered your practically looking for a fight and the attention. One that you can win that is...And so.

Never mind me...Like totally, Carry on.

Umm, i dont need your permission or guidance... thanks?

I was more angry that he attacked me out of nowhere over a topic i didnt even raise, i think everyone would be a little irate about that.

And for the last time, i am not a feminist

reply to post by SearchLightsInc

So you're rewriting history now to suit your wacko facts?

No at all, i was just stating the fact if MOST men were against it, it would have never passed, thus Most men actually agreed with the old feminist movement due to all the efforts in war and other areas where women assisted.

Good question, why are you scared of anything feminine? Maybe you just dont understand women and the basic fact that they are not second rate citizens who need to have a man's permission to live.

I do understand women, at least most normal ones anyway. I'm not trying to belittle women, im trying to show how over-empower of women has put men down in various areas. And im not denying women still lack equality in some areas.

And yet, when i ask people like yourself what specifically has feminism done to men that is SO bad, i never get a clear answer.

Isn't the whole thread actually doing that? showing the substandard and decreased value of man in a family? while putting feminized man on pedestal and promoting such man as future men.

"Its made men girly, breakdown of the family, burned my toast this morning"

Can you deny it had zero effect on these things?

*we will argue about the burnt toast later :/

Do you really think a women would have a problem finding a man to sleep with?

Heh, you don't even see the double standard present in your sentence. Go against human biology but embrace it when it supports your interest.

Hey Lucid, do you check under your bed at night before you sleep to make sure there's not a feminist hiding under there ready to steal your masculinity?

Its is not scared of me.... i need a more militant feminist to get it out! help!!!!

Quite interestng and accurate observations -
divorce laws in western countries are definetly biased in womens favor ( from experience 3 of my 13 ex wives were american and in two of the divorces got royally ****** by the system there .. )

cant say on television and movies or advertising as havent watched television since 80 .. nearly as long since watched a movie ..

not surprised in the least with how the feminest movement has been over there that things are now stacked greatly in womens favour ...

maybe - ( extremely long shot ) people will realise all are equal and end the idiocy that leads only to further disparity and discrimination between genders .. ( among other problems created by political correctness over there .. )

90% of all male sexual assault goes unreported, partially because society has pressured men in certain ways to be ashamed of such things. There are virtually NO help groups or anything for men who suffer sexual abuse.

Other than by another guy....can a guy really BE sexually assaulted?

I mean, even if a monstrous gal were able to have her way with me, I'd likely chalk it up as eh?

I'd likely change the details of the story though....