It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
reply to post by MrWendal
She didn't say that. She said he was right beside his house. I said he died 10 to 30 seconds from his house (depending on if he ran there or walked there).
Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
reply to post by IvanAstikov
BASED ON THE FACT THAT HIS FRIEND ON THE PHONE SAID HE DID.
She said he was by his house and then they talked for several more minutes. He was about 10 - 30 seconds from his home. He waited and confronted. He could have been home he had plenty of time to get in, he chose NOT TO.
She said he was by his house and then they talked for several more minutes.
He waited and confronted
He could have been home he had plenty of time to get in, he chose NOT TO.
Of course she didn't say it. She didn't say much more than yes sir, no sir.
She said he was right beside his house, where he hung out for several minutes before confronting Zimmerman. He died about a football field or less from his house. He was a football player with no injuries it's safe to presume he could have been there in about 10 seconds running or 30 seconds walking/jogging. But even if you disagree with THAT you cannot disagree that he could have been home within the few minutes he decided to stay "beside his house" rather than going inside.edit on 28-6-2013 by GogoVicMorrow because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
.Stalking is when you follow the same person on multiple occasions. Stalking is following, following is not always stalking. Following someone is NOT a crime. That has been stated by multiple experts over the past year.
LOL he wasn't in hot pursuit was my point. I'll do the same to you. You said how peeled could his eyes be if he lost Zimmerman. I will say how much could he be following him to lose him?
His eyes were peeled trying to see if he could SEE Martin again. He was no longer following but on his way back to his truck when Martin confronted and jumped him.
Just because you didn't hear her say it doesn't mean she didn't. Watch the last of her testimony with the Defense. She said he ran, the were disconnected, she called back 20 seconds later and he was by his house, they talked for several more minutes (where he didn't go inside the house ever) and then he saw and confronted Zimmerman.
That was her testimony. If you can't understand what that means then I can't help you.
The argument about him being a football player and how long it would take to get to his house is not a silly argument. It is important. He was hanging around outside his house for several minutes. If he was afraid of the guy following him he would have gone inside to safety. Instead he stayed outside for several minutes (several minutes every second of which he could have been going in his house) and then confronted Zimmerman when he came back in. It's very important information.edit on 28-6-2013 by GogoVicMorrow because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
reply to post by MrWendal
NO. You are twisting the reality. She told him to run. He ran then when she called back he said he was by his house. So when he ran we know that he was already VERY close to his house. We know where he was. You are playing dumb like the information of where he was isn't available. Hell he could have run from the gas station to his house in the time he waited "beside his house" for Zimmerman.
He ran, then when she called back he was beside his house. He didn't run anymore while she was on the phone he just hung out and waited on Zimmerman. I don't think he was ever a 5 minute run from his house that entire night.
When he started running he was already right by his house by most peoples standards. So when he told her (after running) that he was beside his house, common sense tells you he was literally RIGHT BY his house.
Then he waited there.
You need to study the case more. He was never far from his house the entire house. So after he ran he was right by his house where he waited.
He was not required to go in his house, nor did I say he was. However the prosecutions story is that he was scared of this guy that hunted him down. So if we are to believe that story is true and convict Zimmerman than it does NOT make sense that he waited for Zimmerman outside his house after he made it there.
You are not understanding. If you don't know how their paths crossed then you don't understand anything about the case. Martin went through a different route or was way ahead then ducked down the walkway between the buildings. Later Zimmerman walked down the path but went past the walkway Martin ducked down to his house (or he may have cut through yards either way he ended up at his house and went back up towards the T). So at that point Zimmerman starts going back the way he came crossing in front of the area that leads to Martin's house a second time (on the way back). Martin who was down there waiting (rather than going inside) walked back towards the T and confronted Zimmerman. That is how they crossed path's again after Zimmerman was going back. Martin waited and approached.edit on 28-6-2013 by GogoVicMorrow because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
reply to post by MrWendal
Wrong. He committed the crime of assault. The first one to commit a crime that night was Martin and so Zimmerman killed him in self defense.
You are wrong about why they came face to face again. You can't seem to grasp the concept that Zimmerman overshot Martin's location. Zimmerman went PAST where Martin was so when he quit looking for him and turned around Martin was able to get between Zimmerman and his truck.
edit on 28-6-2013 by GogoVicMorrow because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by DontTreadOnMe
ATTENTION!!!!
You are responsible for your own posts.
This thread will not be derailed by off topic remarks or images.
Bickering and name-calling will not be tolerated. Private side conversations belong in Private Messages.
Those who cannot post civilly and on topic may find themselves viewing this thread from the side-lines.
We expect civility and decorum within all topics.
--Off Topic, One Liners and General Back Scratching Posts--
edit on Fri Jun 28 2013 by DontTreadOnMe because: (no reason given)