It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by JoeP2247
Why do you assume a Pakistan/India conflict can be localized? It cannot. We are aligned with India - we will have to go to their aid - by treaty.
Mao overtook Chang Ki Shek in the 40's - we are aligned with Taiwan by treaty - we have to go to their aid.
And that pits the capitalists v communists in that country - by definition. Now the Maoists are challenging the capitalists in the mainland after they have been deposed - I do not know what you find unclear about this.
Please explain what you think is not clear - I do not understand - and I really want to be wrong here.
Joe
Originally posted by GargIndia
Originally posted by JoeP2247
Why do you assume a Pakistan/India conflict can be localized? It cannot. We are aligned with India - we will have to go to their aid - by treaty.
Who is aligned with India? Who are you talking about?
We have a defense treaty with India if they are ever attacked.
Mao overtook Chang Ki Shek in the 40's - we are aligned with Taiwan by treaty - we have to go to their aid.
And that pits the capitalists v communists in that country - by definition. Now the Maoists are challenging the capitalists in the mainland after they have been deposed - I do not know what you find unclear about this.
All societies suffer from internal struggles - and the one between haves and have-not is an eternal one.
You are assuming that China is not or will not be able to manage the difference in wealth between social classes.
You are forgetting the Chinese people are very money minded, and there is a strong aspiration factor. Everybody wants to get rich. As long as China maintains a facade of providing education and opportunities to all people, social strife cannot get out of hand.
No I see the Chinese as very survival minded - they cannot simply put up a façade - they will have to deal with those inland provinces they raped to get to where they are. Facades do not feed them.
Please explain what you think is not clear - I do not understand - and I really want to be wrong here.
Joe
Listening to other helps sometimes.
Originally posted by GargIndia
reply to post by JiggyPotamus
Your post is very good.
Technology can advance very rapidly sometimes. I have found Chinese to be very smart people, in fact smarter than Americans.
I have no reason to under-estimate the Chinese.
Originally posted by Czulkang
reply to post by JoeP2247
Your Theiry is interesting, I would ass that we spend as much on defense as the next 6 countries combinedi think and that being said I just wonder what kind of real nasty # our government/military are working on that we have no fing idea about. I'm talking about black projects and such.
Originally posted by Lingweenie
Hard to say if there would be a WW III soon. To me, I doubt we'll have one on the horizon right now. The advances we've made in weaponry would devastate our planet far to much, if it were to be a all out world war (especially is there was usage of chemical/nuclear weapons.)
Let's hope it never comes, but let's face it, there probably will be one eventually. Most likely when our population grows way to high, and natural resources start really getting scarce. And that doesn't seem to long down the road if we keep doing what we're doing. If one were to occur, I'd have to say I'd be around 2030-2040.
Like Einstein once said; "I know not what weapons will be used in WW III, but I do know WW IV will be fought with sticks and stones."
We cannot handle another world war, for the sake of humanity, and our planet.
Originally posted by Sandcastler
World War 3 you can bet will include the same players from WW2, but on different sides perhaps. Japan, Germany, USA, Russia, and the UK will definitely be involved. It all depends on the playing field that is agreed upon. I think OP's theory of a China vs. India theater is a good one, because of the high population. Dropping those nations down a few notches would help a lot of the old world. Africa would be the other theater, because nobody gives a # about it. Ya, there's some oil, but it isn't the middle east which would screw everyone if that is wasted. Mainland USA/Canada along with western Europe/eastern Russia will not be fought over, because that is insta-nuke territory and everyone knows it.