reply to post by Witness2008
Well, yes....and sadly no also, it is a clearly defined wall actually.
If your primary income is, or you are making more than X, than under certain criteria your considered a "business" and subject to certain criteria,
one being that your entity known as "your business" is subject to and under the authority of the IRS to recover certain monetary or financial
liabilities in conjuction with the laws pertaining to commerce, interstate transport, and all taxes fees and permits associated with them.
They have vreated a catch 22, which is supposed to be a legal paradox, which isn't supposed to exist.
To clarify this, they have created a system where by all must "agree" to afore mentioned taxation, or be noncompliant, with the tax laws.
Seeing how all political parties have weilded the IRS like a bastard sword over the years, and thus set multiple extreme precidents, it is
inconceivable that one might challenge this in court and win anything but fines, penalties, and judgements against them.
Thus making the illegal now legal, and without recourse of redress, so in, they are now allowd to apply the law as "wanted" at "will" and without
So in lies the fatal flaw with any and all tax codes, mzking them both viable ( real and binding) and contrandictory thus invalid at the same time.
Which way will the "supremes" go?
Well guys your guess is as good as any others, even scholars in the field can't decide, and neither can any other.
At best, we pay illegal income taxes, though admittedly need for infrastructure etc..., and illegalsiezures of property and income that at the same
time seems at face value, to comply with an illegal law.
In truth, if, and as evidenced, the government can and does print as much as needed, at the want, print as much money as it deems necessary, wgy
should or would they have a need to tax the people at all.
It boggles the mind.
They already print more than they tax every year, so why tax atall?
It seems the only reason for it all is to impose financial hardship on the people as a whole, in order to subjigate, or rather further serve to impune
the peoples ability to vote via monetary consent, on certain lawful/unlawful activities.
In the end, we are all just slaves, and that is how they both envisioned and intend it to be.
One phrase comes to mind, and one only.
" the strong did what they could, the weak suffered what they must."