It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by beezzer
New York is looking at raising the age to buy tobacco products to 21.
Yet 15 year olds are supposedly old enough to make a determination that will affect their body.
Either lower the drinking/smoking age to 15, or get rid of this idiotic rule that allows 15 year-old girls to make these individual determinations.
Originally posted by 48e18
Originally posted by beezzer
New York is looking at raising the age to buy tobacco products to 21.
Yet 15 year olds are supposedly old enough to make a determination that will affect their body.
Either lower the drinking/smoking age to 15, or get rid of this idiotic rule that allows 15 year-old girls to make these individual determinations.
I'm not saying I agree with either, but New York isn't being contradictory here. Both cases are to try to curb a public health issue. People smoking and dying of cancer is a drain on society and the healthcare system and so is teenage pregnancy.
Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
reply to post by Wrabbit2000
I think 15 year olds should be allowed to have it, I just think they should have to have an adult with them when they purchase it. Not even a parent necessarily, just someone that is older and a bit smarter so they don't buy a ton of them and take one after every time they have sex. 15 year olds are stupid.
People doing things to themselves, self-determining isn't/wasn't a drain on society. . . . until the advent of Obamacare.
Before, people could do what they wanted with their own bodies.
Now?
Our bodies don't belong to our individual selves. They are part of the "collective" now.
Originally posted by 48e18
reply to post by beezzer
People doing things to themselves, self-determining isn't/wasn't a drain on society. . . . until the advent of Obamacare.
Before, people could do what they wanted with their own bodies.
Now?
Our bodies don't belong to our individual selves. They are part of the "collective" now.
Are you serious?
The government has been trying to fight against high lung cancer rates due to smoking for decades now...exactly how do you just pin that on "Obamacare"?
I'm confused, are you for this decision to make the morning after pill more available, because it sounds like you are making a pro-choice argument about being able to do whatever you want with people's own bodies.
Yes I'm serious. YOU were the one who started off with the "drain to society".
People should be able to choose what they do to their own bodies.
Not the state.
Originally posted by 48e18
reply to post by beezzer
Yes I'm serious. YOU were the one who started off with the "drain to society".
People should be able to choose what they do to their own bodies.
Not the state.
So you are pro-choice?
Originally posted by beezzer
Originally posted by 48e18
reply to post by beezzer
Yes I'm serious. YOU were the one who started off with the "drain to society".
People should be able to choose what they do to their own bodies.
Not the state.
So you are pro-choice?
Nope. People can do whatever they want with their own bodies.
An infant is another individual. Another body.
Originally posted by 48e18
Originally posted by beezzer
Originally posted by 48e18
reply to post by beezzer
Yes I'm serious. YOU were the one who started off with the "drain to society".
People should be able to choose what they do to their own bodies.
Not the state.
So you are pro-choice?
Nope. People can do whatever they want with their own bodies.
An infant is another individual. Another body.
So in the case of this morning after pill...you are a supporter of it?
The pill doesn't do anything except to the women's body.
And if this pill is allowed to 15 year olds, then why isn't tobacco or alcohol?
Originally posted by 48e18
reply to post by beezzer
And if this pill is allowed to 15 year olds, then why isn't tobacco or alcohol?
Well that doesn't entirely make sense.
We know tobacco and alcohol are both damaging to the body in the short and long term. I see no reason not to limit these things to adults.
But this brings up another question...are you for the legalization of all drugs?
Originally posted by Wertdagf
reply to post by beezzer
you cant figure out why the morning after pill is less dangerous than drinking?
Surely your just trolling.
Because children can't make informed decisions based on what to do with their own bodies, correct?
Originally posted by 48e18
reply to post by beezzer
Because children can't make informed decisions based on what to do with their own bodies, correct?
No, because it is damaging to their bodies and addictive to boot. I wouldn't mind seeing both of those ages boosted up to 21.
My second question is very on topic...it will tell the difference between honesty and ideology...I'll tone it down for you though for the teeandcees.
Do you support removing laws on anything you can ingest, smoke, inject into your own body?
Originally posted by Wertdagf
reply to post by neo96
How Is giving people control over their reproduction eugenics?
Why the **** do idiots come out of the woodwork parroting buzzwords. Ive noticed most of the people who do this are religious... because we all know religious people are stupid.