It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by FreeThinkerbychoice
Ps you need a hug and a kiss and somebody to tell you that they love you. Unless of-course your hippocampus, hypothalamus,and Corpus Callosum show low level activities that would indicate a lack of empathy and be the reason why you seem to reason away with love.
HUG HUG HUG
Originally posted by NavyDoc
Originally posted by ThinkingHuman
No - would they really expose us to poison on purpose? Actually, you're right, they do. It is shocking, and it goes completely against what most people naturally "assume".
Originally posted by Corruption Exposed
we are being harmed by these so called safe items. I also believe that there are sick people out there who are purposely exposing us to these poisons to forward their agenda of global depopulation.
Why would they do that? "They", btw, are the governments in collusion with big corporations.
Here is one highly educated Medical Doctor who will tell you why. I wonder who deleted her bio on Wikipedia....
LOL. Her entire premise is "this patient in my office told me so."
Originally posted by Wertdagf
reply to post by Corruption Exposed
Are people living longer on average now than 50 years ago?
Shouldn't life expectancy be dwindling if your correct?
Originally posted by ThinkingHuman
Originally posted by NavyDoc
Originally posted by ThinkingHuman
No - would they really expose us to poison on purpose? Actually, you're right, they do. It is shocking, and it goes completely against what most people naturally "assume".
Originally posted by Corruption Exposed
we are being harmed by these so called safe items. I also believe that there are sick people out there who are purposely exposing us to these poisons to forward their agenda of global depopulation.
Why would they do that? "They", btw, are the governments in collusion with big corporations.
Here is one highly educated Medical Doctor who will tell you why. I wonder who deleted her bio on Wikipedia....
LOL. Her entire premise is "this patient in my office told me so."
Just because she quotes this person, she is not premising her conclusions about GMO's on that. If you have a medical education, maybe you can take apart her factual claims instead.
A bad experience has allowed me to gain insight into the charade and hypocrisy of the medical profession. Those who are interested should watch "First Do No Harm" with Meryl Streep.
I'm not aware of any specific actions taken by the government to provide protection beyond what all corporations receive as a matter of course when doing business.
Can you point me to some data that supports this?
Originally posted by spoogemonkey
Hrmm chemo hey..
As a son of an active oncologist.. I don't think it too wise to refuse chemo if the data suggests your particular type of cancer responds to it.
In fact, he's had many patients who refuse chemo due to various reasons, and the stats (his stats also, over 4 decades in the game) say one thing: survival rates and life expectancy are lower for those who refuse. This isn't some broad statement, or a guess. It's very real and tangible, and from someone who has to make this choice for patients everyday.
You want to think twice before refusing chemo. And those who advocate using only all natural treatment need to pull their head out of their arsh.. sorry, and stop filling peoples heads with stuff that reduces their chance at life. Seriously.
There's a place for natural medicine, no doubt. And that place is to compliment modern medicine, not as an alternative altogether.
end rant/
Originally posted by HawkeyeNation
This is a bad thing because....
I mean we have to depopulize. We're over populated as it is. Could you imagine what this place would be like with another 3-4 billion people. It would not look good.
Originally posted by HawkeyeNation
This is a bad thing because....
I mean we have to depopulize. We're over populated as it is. Could you imagine what this place would be like with another 3-4 billion people. It would not look good.
Originally posted by Blue Shift
Originally posted by FreeThinkerbychoice
Ps you need a hug and a kiss and somebody to tell you that they love you. Unless of-course your hippocampus, hypothalamus,and Corpus Callosum show low level activities that would indicate a lack of empathy and be the reason why you seem to reason away with love.
HUG HUG HUG
Just let me die. Don't attack another country to protect my way of life (unless it's Mexico, then go ahead), don't use insanely extraordinary measures to keep me alive in my old age, don't cover every surface with disinfectant so some mutant supervirus pops up. I know you care, but it's really not for the best in the long run.
Originally posted by Bob Sholtz
. solving problems would eliminate business.
Originally posted by Semicollegiate
reply to post by engineer418
I'm not aware of any specific actions taken by the government to provide protection beyond what all corporations receive as a matter of course when doing business.
Can you point me to some data that supports this?
Money facilitates legal success. In the sense that megacorporations can spend millions to acheive legal success, (paid for by the consumer or the tax payer) the government maintains the status quo and wealthy whatevers get protected.
The cash nexus is the means by which the powers that be reign.
Money is not the root of all evil, ignorance and inattention are.
evolution continues