It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

VOTE: 2004 U.S. Election Results Overview & Discussion

page: 30
0
<< 27  28  29    31  32  33 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 3 2004 @ 01:26 AM
link   
Great coverage guys and gals. While I may have my own opinon about the outcome of this race, diebold aside and all, we've made our choice.

-- night

[edit on 3-11-2004 by ktprktpr]



posted on Nov, 3 2004 @ 01:26 AM
link   
Edwards is speaking now.



posted on Nov, 3 2004 @ 01:27 AM
link   

Originally posted by AlnilamOmega
and what's with this low voter turnout? I thought that there was more of a concerted effort towards getting people to vote more so than ever. Yet, with a supposed population of 280 million, barely over 100 million actually voted? either something is seriously wrong with the tabulation of these votes (more than likely) or we are lazier than we think.


The voting population is less than 280 million.

Let me see if I can dig it up, I am still half asleep and can't remember by memory atm.



posted on Nov, 3 2004 @ 01:27 AM
link   
Introduced as the next VP.
Crowd cheers.
Long wait, we can wait one more night. Thanks to all who havce stood with us.
Promised that every vote would count, and they will be counted. They will fight for every vote. Thanks crowd, then leaves.



posted on Nov, 3 2004 @ 01:27 AM
link   
and why edwards? why not kerry? does this not look a bit weak on their side? at least it was not a concession speech. short, but to the point.



posted on Nov, 3 2004 @ 01:28 AM
link   

Originally posted by phreak_of_nature
Edwards to Appear in Boston. Certainly not to be a consession speech. Probably more of a the fight aint over speech.


Yes "we will fight for every vote" was the message. Here come the lawyers



posted on Nov, 3 2004 @ 01:30 AM
link   
WTF is that.
Crowd is leaving now.

Obviously they don't seem willing to except the results of some of the Batleground states. We WILL see another legal challenge to this election.

I don't know what kind of legs it will have with Bush leading the EC and popular vote at this point.



posted on Nov, 3 2004 @ 01:30 AM
link   
According to the US Census web site:

Voting-Age Population in 2004

217.8 million

www.census.gov...

[edit on 3-11-2004 by Muaddib]



posted on Nov, 3 2004 @ 01:30 AM
link   
called by MSNBC; hawaii goes to Kerry (every bit counts)



posted on Nov, 3 2004 @ 01:30 AM
link   
See you in the supreme court biatches.



posted on Nov, 3 2004 @ 01:32 AM
link   

Originally posted by Muaddib
According to US Census web site:

Voting-Age Population in 2004

217.8 million

www.census.gov...


Thanks, Muaddib!!

much appreciated!

Isn't that number of voter turnout even more alarming knowing that figure though? That's a lot of freakin' people! Maybe more than 50% of that 100,000,000 difference DID vote and... *poof* gone. didn't count. just speculation.



posted on Nov, 3 2004 @ 01:32 AM
link   
Bush widens lead in Nevada

George W. Bush (REP)* 319,704 50%
John F. Kerry (DEM) 303,312 48%
Ralph Nader (IND) 3,568 1%
67% of precincts reporting

From MSNBC.com



posted on Nov, 3 2004 @ 01:33 AM
link   
MSNBC reporting Ohio now at

George W. Bush (REP)* 2,706,778 51%

John F. Kerry (DEM) 2,581,451 49%

97% of precincts reporting



posted on Nov, 3 2004 @ 01:35 AM
link   

Originally posted by Muaddib
The voting population is less than 280 million.


It's a good 1/3 less than 280 million, I believe. You must meet the following criteria to be an elegible voter:

-a U.S. citizen
-a citizen of the State you're voting in (or a citizen of D.C.)
-over the age of 18
-not a convicted felon currently serving time in prison or on parole (once you've served your time, you can vote again)
-not in a mental institution

So, no foreigners, children, criminals or insane can vote. Also, a person's vote can only count once, in one State. No bribing votes is allowed either.



posted on Nov, 3 2004 @ 01:35 AM
link   
Naa, there are a lot of people who still don't vote, and the election is still going.

The elections in years past have been more or less the same, going back to Kennedy at least. Let me get the article again.



posted on Nov, 3 2004 @ 01:35 AM
link   
FNC talking about a lower voter turnout in NM this year. What they are missing is one nasty snow storm that keep people from the poles. Many roads closed here today, and snow throughout the morning. 4 years ago we had the same thing. Except then it went to Gore by 366.



posted on Nov, 3 2004 @ 01:37 AM
link   

Originally posted by Nerdling
See you in the supreme court biatches.

DO YOU EVEN LIVE IN THIS COUNTRY?????????



posted on Nov, 3 2004 @ 01:39 AM
link   
Past 2:30 here in MTL I'm about done.

Good job everybody.

PS: I started a Diebold thread ...heh..heh..



posted on Nov, 3 2004 @ 01:40 AM
link   

Originally posted by Phoenix

Originally posted by Nerdling
See you in the supreme court biatches.

DO YOU EVEN LIVE IN THIS COUNTRY?????????


No but he is reporting objectively. Sure he was on Team Dem. for the Campaign 2004, but it's over now, and the results are the resulats, and the statement made by Edwards did lead one to conclude that the Kerry Camp is going to fight the results. I would have to concure with him on this asssumption.

Oh yeah, I was team Centerist, and don't have a dog in this fight.



posted on Nov, 3 2004 @ 01:40 AM
link   

Originally posted by Phoenix

Originally posted by Nerdling
See you in the supreme court biatches.

DO YOU EVEN LIVE IN THIS COUNTRY?????????


Nope, Nerdling is one of many foreigners on ATS; he lives in Scotland, U.K.



new topics

top topics



 
0
<< 27  28  29    31  32  33 >>

log in

join