It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Bedlam
reply to post by hawkiye
This is the logical fallacy known as the non-sequitur.
That the Army sprayed serratia around doesn't somehow validate 'chemtrails'.
Originally posted by fiftyfifty
reply to post by hawkiye
Are you for real?! This proves absolutely nothing about chemtrails. All this proves is that the US army intentionally droppped chemicals on a couple of US cities to measure their effects during the Cold War. I'm sure that not many will be surprised by this. A conspiracy? Yes of course, proof of chemtrails? Fail!
It also doesn't prove that it has been happening SINCE the 50's, it proves that it happened IN the 50's.
If you can specifically link this to today's commercial airliners all over the world then my eyes are wide open to your reply.
In 1962, Silent Spring by American biologist Rachel Carson was published. The book catalogued the environmental impacts of the indiscriminate spraying of DDT in the US and questioned the logic of releasing large amounts of chemicals into the environment without fully understanding their effects on ecology or human health. The book suggested that DDT and other pesticides may cause cancer and that their agricultural use was a threat to wildlife, particularly birds. Its publication was one of the signature events in the birth of the environmental movement, and resulted in a large public outcry that eventually led to DDT being banned in the US in 1972.
Originally posted by fiftyfifty
reply to post by hawkiye
Are you for real?! This proves absolutely nothing about chemtrails. All this proves is that the US army intentionally droppped chemicals on a couple of US cities to measure their effects during the Cold War. I'm sure that not many will be surprised by this. A conspiracy? Yes of course, proof of chemtrails? Fail!
It also doesn't prove that it has been happening SINCE the 50's, it proves that it happened IN the 50's.
If you can specifically link this to today's commercial airliners all over the world then my eyes are wide open to your reply.
Originally posted by hawkiye
Wow its up to 3 now claiming the spraying of chemicals on people from the sky are not chemtrails... Yeah ok and and someone peeing on your back is really it's just raining out... This confirms a bridge must have collapsed somewhere...
As for the genocide thing I just copied the title of the video so sue me, but hey is there an official number somewhere of what constitutes genocide?
Originally posted by ManFromEurope
Originally posted by hawkiye
Wow its up to 3 now claiming the spraying of chemicals on people from the sky are not chemtrails... Yeah ok and and someone peeing on your back is really it's just raining out... This confirms a bridge must have collapsed somewhere...
As for the genocide thing I just copied the title of the video so sue me, but hey is there an official number somewhere of what constitutes genocide?
Yes, a genocide is defined. I will not quote wikipedia, you may look it up for yourself if you want to.
Anyway, without having seen the video (what is it always with "LOOK! PROOF! VIDEO!" - what about naming the author, giving an abstract and such things without pressing me to see some youtube-thingie?), there were tests with cities. Even with chemicals today considered as extremely dangerous.
Where is the connection to the *-trails you see today in the sky?
"They" denotated a lot of nuclear bombs in those years, too. Is that happening today, too?
Because, following your logic, what they did then would be nothing compared to the things they would do today, right?
Originally posted by Nostalgic
But what I'm not understanding is how you can so blatantly disregard the fact that the military was poisoning it's own people, without consent, and you'd rather argue about semantics. How is it possibly "okay" that our own military is willing to experiment on it's own unwilling participants? War time or not? I believe that was the point the OP was trying to make.
Declassified Docs Reveal Genocide Caused By Chemtrail Testing
I find the fact that our military used a populated city as guinea pigs, without telling them, far more offensive than the OP's misuse of terminology.
Originally posted by hawkiye
Originally posted by Bedlam
reply to post by hawkiye
Except, of course, it wasn't "chemtrails",it was low level spraying, done in some cases from roof tops.
But "chemtrails" sounds so much creepier. Oh, by the way, 'genocide' doesn't seem to cover the truth either, so it's sort of a double misnomer - no genocide, and no 'chemtrail testing'.
Wow guess you missed the part about them using jets.... Isn't their a bridge missing you somewhere? ... Sigh!