posted on Mar, 26 2013 @ 02:35 PM
Originally posted by anonymous1legion
Firstly If "they" were spaying CHEMICALS from aircraft (man made flying machines) then YES IT IS A CHEM-TRAIL... (CHEMICAL-TRAIL) whether it
dissipates, hangs or whatever its still a chemtrail
FALSE. If there is no trail, there van be no chemtrail, the word trail is pretty vital.
We all KNOW that chemicals and other compounds can be and have been released from aircraft. Cloud seeding, firefighting, Cold war experimentation,
crop dusting. These are all real and proveable. Maybe you actually need to learn what a chemtrail is supposed to be before spouting off in
secondly its publicly known that "they" have been spraying and testing since at least ww2
so dunno whether people are so silly as to think the government/military wouldnt do such a thing
Yes, but proof of one thing is not proof of something else, is it. And (ANY believer) please do highlight ONE post where a sceptic has said any
government wouldn't do such a thing or are to be trusted? I am sick of seeing this false argument of "Oh, you don't believe in chemtrails so you
trust the government" as a substitute for real information and debate.
but cmon if you guys can believe the government would do that then why not this??? maybe what the op has come across is the predecessor the the
chemtrails we all know and love today,
i mean the vietnam war is now a proven lie but no the government wouldn't lie about spraying us
This is where you, and so many others, are going wrong.
Of course any government or organisation that felt it could benefit and/or get away with chemtrailing would do it. Of course the Politicians lie to
us, they do it everyday.
But what does that tell you about the reality of chemtrails? NOTHING. To accept something is real, there must be evidence that it exists, not merely
that it could exist.
Please give me one solid reason WHY you think chemtrails are really being sprayed all over on a daily basis, rather than could be, which we all
edit on 26-3-2013 by waynos because: (no reason given)