posted on Mar, 24 2013 @ 12:57 PM
Originally posted by DenyObfuscation
reply to post by seamus
OK smart guy, it's about position. Explain the conjunction of Jupiter within the parameters of your model.
Jupiter was lagging behind the sun
by a few million miles on one side of the sun, and we were lagging behind the sun a few million miles on the other side of the sun. I thought that
would be obvious. Even to a non-astronomer like me. Remember, "If you can't explain it to a six-year-old child, you don't really understand it
yourself." - my favorite quote from Einstein
The cone is millions of miles deep, but compared to the billions of miles encompassed by our solar system, it would look visually 'flat' if presented
Then what exactly is the point of this conical system?
It's not flat as it is and has been portrayed since I don't know when. Probably since
No one I know of actually thinks the solar system is "flat". The other planets have orbits inclined to ours.
edit on 23-3-2013 by
DenyObfuscation because: (no reason given)
The importance of the difference is the way planets are dragged behind the sun, like a
comet's debris tail, rather than coasting through a perfect vacuum.
edit on 24-3-2013 by seamus because: fix quotes