The shooters have all been Democrats!!!

Originally posted by SkepticOverlord

Originally posted by MsAphrodite
Democrats are the ones who want to make gun ownership illegal,

That's a totally incorrect statement. Why is the inflammatory exaggeration?

I think you are trying to impress management at MSNBC...now that anti-everthing American Ed Schulz was fired
Shocking...

if you have no faith, if you believe we are just smart animals, then there is nothing inherently wrong with killing, other than what the state dictates

reply to post by MsAphrodite


John Wilkes Booth was a solid Democrat.

Leon Czolgosz, the assassin of President McKinley, was an avowed liberal socialist.

Don't get me started on Lee Harvey Oswald's political affiliation.

Originally posted by MsAphrodite

It would be nice to see a little more factual evidence/information of this other than a scanned newspaper clipping of a 'Dear Editor' article...yawn.

Basically what you're going on is one citizen's belief that these shooters were Democrats. Where is his evidence?

This thread is insulting to the premiss of this entire site...good one.

reply to post by MsAphrodite


Based on that logic (as I'm sure someone has said), we can make further connections: They all took baths in the local water within a week of going on these killing sprees and they have family members who bathed regularly.

Evidence shows that most of the rampage killers in America are White males under the age of 40 who came from a family that bathes and who take baths regularly. (yes, that's true)

My point is that you can pick ANY data point and find a reason to demonize a group.

I kind of like the idea of their asinine laws only applying to registerd members of their party - thats just-us in my opinion, leave the rest of us alone in our beliefs and our pockets.

Yup, JUST-US is the mantra so should be no problem.

See how many stupid rules, laws and crap they'd pass if it only applied to them instead of trampling all over others to steal them blind.and abridge others rights.

Originally posted by InnerLogic

Originally posted by MsAphrodite

It would be nice to see a little more factual evidence/information of this other than a scanned newspaper clipping of a 'Dear Editor' article...yawn.

Basically what you're going on is one citizen's belief that these shooters were Democrats. Where is his evidence?

This thread is insulting to the premiss of this entire site...good one.

DENIAL AIN'T A RIVER IN EGYPT:

Political affiliation of 20th century assassins

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

It seems that political assassins of the 20th century were either crazy or they were left wing marxists. Leon Cgolgosz opened the bloody 20th century with a bang when he killed President McKinley at point blank range on 8/31/01. He is described as a left wing anarchist. John Schrank shot Teddy Roosevelt on 10/14/12 but Teddy survived. Schrank spent the rest of his life raving in a lunatic asylum. A group of Marxist Puerto Rican liberation fanatics tried to kill Harry Truman on 11/1/50. Traitor turncoat Lee Oswald who had renounced his US citizenship killed President Kennedy November 1963. Palistinian left wing jihadist Sirhan Sirhan killed Bobby Kennedy on 6/5/68. It should be noted that he is still in prison. 5/15/72 left wing activist Arthur Bremer shot and paralized Gov George Wallace a noted segregationist. Bremer had no source of income and yet was traced following Wallace all over the Country. He was released from prison in 2007 after serving 35 of a 58 year sentence. Manson soldier Lynette "Squeeky" Fromme tried to kill President Jerry Ford on 9/5/75. Her political affiliation leans left. A week or so later on 9/22/75 Sara Jane Moore fired a shot at President Ford. When released from prison 32 years later at age 77 in 2007 she said she was blinded by her radical left wing beliefs. John Hinkley's political motivation remains a mystery thanks to the non-interest by the left wing press but he was found not guilty by means of insanity for shooting President Reagan.

The entire premise is moot unless the REASON they shot people was BECAUSE they were Democrats. Otherwise I don't see the point of this at all.

Other than to take a shot at your opposing party of course. The idea that all Democrats should not be allowed to have guns because of a few mentally unstable murderers is insane and ludicrous.

reply to post by Byrd


The pilot who flew his light aircraft into the office building in Texas a few years back was also a registered democrat and I hear he was well bathed also

The demonization going on has been towards lawful legitimate gun owners and their constitutional right to bear arms. The usurpers attempting abridgement of these rights are in the main progressive and reside to the left of center. As long as legitimate firearm owners are painted as they are by these folks then IT IS fair game to point out the utter hypocracy when they attempt to redirect blame onto those who do not in anyway, shape, form or manner deserve such vitriol.

I take the OP as pointing out a need to clean their own house before criticizing others and (the so-called party of individual rights, my arse) attempting to weaken others rights based upon their own fears.

Originally posted by Byrd
reply to post by MsAphrodite

 

Based on that logic (as I'm sure someone has said), we can make further connections: They all took baths in the local water within a week of going on these killing sprees and they have family members who bathed regularly.

Evidence shows that most of the rampage killers in America are White males under the age of 40 who came from a family that bathes and who take baths regularly. (yes, that's true)

My point is that you can pick ANY data point and find a reason to demonize a group.

Well, I don't know about you, but I'd say it's time we look into banning showers and baths.

Originally posted by Byrd
reply to post by MsAphrodite

 

Based on that logic (as I'm sure someone has said), we can make further connections: They all took baths in the local water within a week of going on these killing sprees and they have family members who bathed regularly.

Evidence shows that most of the rampage killers in America are White males under the age of 40 who came from a family that bathes and who take baths regularly. (yes, that's true)

My point is that you can pick ANY data point and find a reason to demonize a group.

The racial angle- get me a list of spree killers and their race- place this in the context of the racial percentage of society at large, and we will see if whites are more likely than anyone else to kill people in shootings

The Romans made a religion out of the baths.

The gladiators bathed like there was no tomorrow.

The bath houses of Chicago were made infamous by the infamous Chicago politician John 'Bath House' Coughlin, puppet to 'Big Jim' Colosimo.

I was watching an 'Idiot Abroad' as they visited the River Ganges. The cremation fires lit the sky. Sometimes the poor people couldn't afford enough lumber to full cremate their deceased loved ones. They would take the charred remains to toss into the River Ganges.

Even the partially cremated have a right to hit the water.

We need more desalinization plants to keep the tradition of bathing and drinking bath house water alive and kicking.

By the way, the Glock will fire underwater.



“The marinized Glock 17 is primarily for use by various Special Warfare units operating in aquatic environments. At least one specialized Scuba diving group regularly uses G17's to dispatch sharks where they dive. The Glock 17 using NATO specification ball ammunition will completely penetrate a minimum of one 1/2" pine board at a distance of ten feet from the muzzle when fired underwater.
Trained personnel who use Glocks underwater know they must obey several rules:
1) use only a Glock Model 17 with amphibious spring cups (reliability issue);
2) use only 9mm FMJ subsonic, sealed primer ammo;
3) completely immerse the pistol and get *all* the air out of the barrel;
4) wear protective ear plugs, gloves, wet suit, face mask, etc.;
5) do not fire near solid objects or in enclosed spaces to prevent return
concussion.”

Originally posted by coltcall
reply to post by MsAphrodite

 

John Wilkes Booth was a solid Democrat.

Leon Czolgosz, the assassin of President McKinley, was an avowed liberal socialist.

Don't get me started on Lee Harvey Oswald's political affiliation.

John Fitzgerald Kennedy was the only true progressive president as far as I can recall. In america there is very little tolerance for liberals, let alone progressivism. The reasons he was killed are numerous but speculated upon are a)wanted to nationalise the FED b)wanted ufo disclosure c)was against secret societies

Some people claim he was a right winger but then he would not be running as a democrat president, which obviously he was. There is nothing wrong with a mixed economy and not all socialists are communists either. Further I know many socialists(centrists) who believe in god but dislike the official church which for the most part amounts only to propaganda. If Jesus was still alive he would be a socialist, not some corrupt capitalist vampire which is what many of today's "christians" fall for.

As for a liberal killing him I would not be suprised one bit. Some liberals are right enough on the political spectrum that they could easily become conservatives.

reply to post by Credenceskynyrd


Outright number of murders, no don't think that'll fly. Spree killing sure.

I do fail to understand how a proclivity of the left to disarm americans based upon actions of folks who lean their way politically devolves into a racial discussion.

While we're there may I point out "jim crow" laws and period after reformation as one which disarmed a certain class of people in order to prevent them from holding certain liberties named by the constitution.

On that premise I can say gun control is definitly racially discriminatory as the past has proven.

Is that to repeat?

reply to post by fleabit

The entire premise is moot unless the REASON they shot people was BECAUSE they were Democrats. Otherwise I don't see the point of this at all.

The point was to illustrate the hypocrisy of the left. Democrats have historically been the party going after guns yet, as the OP pointed out, most killers are registered democrats.

I love how someone had to throw the name Timothy McVeigh in there!

Other than to take a shot at your opposing party of course. The idea that all Democrats should not be allowed to have guns because of a few mentally unstable murderers is insane and ludicrous.

The idea that ANY AMERICAN should not be allowed to own guns because of the actions of a few mentally unstable murderers is insane and ludicrous. Yet that is exactly what the democrats are suggesting today.

Originally posted by Phoenix
reply to post by Byrd

 

The pilot who flew his light aircraft into the office building in Texas a few years back was also a registered democrat and I hear he was well bathed also

The demonization going on has been towards lawful legitimate gun owners and their constitutional right to bear arms. The usurpers attempting abridgement of these rights are in the main progressive and reside to the left of center. As long as legitimate firearm owners are painted as they are by these folks then IT IS fair game to point out the utter hypocracy when they attempt to redirect blame onto those who do not in anyway, shape, form or manner deserve such vitriol.

I take the OP as pointing out a need to clean their own house before criticizing others and (the so-called party of individual rights, my arse) attempting to weaken others rights based upon their own fears.

The republicans pretend to have more tolerance for a literal interpretation of the second amendment than the democrats, but when it comes to everything else they are just as evil and corrupt as the democrats, perhaps more so.

The key word is pretend! Just like democrats pretend to care for the poor.

reply to post by EarthCitizen07


JFK signed his death warrant when he went against the CIA's plan to provide air support for the Bay of Pigs Invasion.

RFK helped kill JFK (and himself) by going after the Mafia (the same Sam Giancana and Jimmy Hoffa who put JFK into office by a mere one hundred thousand Chicago votes).

The Kennedys forgot who they were, where they came from and who put them there. Their egos were substantial and debilitating.

Obama (also known as Obusho) knows where he came from (he could probably draw you a full scale map of Kenya from repressed boyhood memories). Obama won't buck the CIA's war in the Mideast Obama won't try to cordon off the drug flow from across the Mexican border. Obama will retire to his 45 million dollar mansion in Hawaii.

Originally posted by coltcall
reply to post by EarthCitizen07

 

JFK signed his death warrant when he went against the CIA's plan to provide air support for the Bay of Pigs Invasion.

RFK helped kill JFK (and himself) by going after the Mafia (the same Sam Giancana and Jimmy Hoffa who put JFK into office by a mere one hundred thousand Chicago votes).

The Kennedys forgot who they were, where they came from and who put them there. Their egos were substantial and debilitating.

Obama (also known as Obusho) knows where he came from (he could probably draw you a full scale map of Kenya from repressed boyhood memories). Obama won't buck the CIA's war in the Mideast Obama won't try to cordon off the drug flow from across the Mexican border. Obama will retire to his 45 million dollar mansion in Hawaii.

Dick Cheney and Eric Holder should have been prosecuted and behind bars by now. It makes no difference to me if you are D and R when it comes to treason and other high crimes. People should be punished for the crimes they commit just like anyone else.

reply to post by seabag

The point was to illustrate the hypocrisy of the left.

Really, by lying and spreading misinformation about this idea that all those shooters were Democrats? Since the OP posted an article that was false and filled with misinformation, this is irrelevant, because it's suppose to prove the "hypocrisy" of the left? How is this justified again? huh?

Will this go into the hoax bin or disinformation forum? What's the wait for?