It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
Originally posted by buster2010
What can be more immoral than forcing your religious delusions on your employees.
The answer to that is easy. Forcing your idea of non-religion upon others who were minding their own business and generating no complaints or serious problems prior to that effort.
And now his employee's can sue Domino's for access to contraception.
And let me make another point. Oral contraceptives are not just for birth control. Many women who suffer from ovarian cysts need that medication to control the condition.
The cysts can be very painful.
Domino's founder needs to rethink his narrow minded position.
His pocket book might suffer for it.
Originally posted by Helious
Originally posted by buster2010
Originally posted by jibeho
One small victory at a time.... Next come the attack dogs to have this judge's decision over turned.....
Short lived..
As it should be over turned. The judge chose to follow religion instead of the law.
But..... But...... Freedom of Religion is a right in America granted by the supreme law, The Constitution and therefor must be considered when applying laws that violate religious beliefs.
Exactly. The supreme law of the land is called the Constitution. Try reading it sometime.
Originally posted by buster2010
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
Originally posted by buster2010
What can be more immoral than forcing your religious delusions on your employees.
The answer to that is easy. Forcing your idea of non-religion upon others who were minding their own business and generating no complaints or serious problems prior to that effort.
America is supposed to be ruled by law not religion.
Don't be obtuse. This case is about the government forcing the owner of a business, and citizens in general, to violate their religious beliefs. That is UnConstitutional.
Originally posted by buster2010
[
And they do have a right to freedom of religion. This case has nothing to do with that this case is forcing other people to follow the owners religion and that is wrong.
Originally posted by jibeho
Originally posted by buster2010
What can be more immoral than forcing your religious delusions on your employees.
You are free to Quit Domino's at any time and work for Papa John's etc etc etc. Pretty Simple.
Delusions? I don't think anyone is being forced into the cult of Domino's
Nothing wrong with a little moral rectitude in our society. We've become a society that seems devoid of it lately...
Praise God!! I'll even say a prayer for your soul tonight when I go to bed.
Nope. Nobody is forcing any beliefs on employees. They can always quit and get another job somewhere else.
Originally posted by buster2010
Nice to see how you think it's ok for religion to be forced on people. The world needs less religion it has done far more damage than good to mankind.
The Domino's founder is quite frankly infringing up on the rights of others.
Why can't people get that through their heads?
Just because your Religion doesn't allow you to do something. Doesn't give you the right to ram your brand of crazy down someone else's throat.
And now his employee's can sue Domino's for access to contraception.
And let me make another point. Oral contraceptives are not just for birth control. Many women who suffer from ovarian cysts need that medication to control the condition.
Domino's founder needs to rethink his narrow minded position.
Originally posted by DarthMuerte
Don't be obtuse. This case is about the government forcing the owner of a business, and citizens in general, to violate their religious beliefs. That is UnConstitutional.
Originally posted by buster2010
[
And they do have a right to freedom of religion. This case has nothing to do with that this case is forcing other people to follow the owners religion and that is wrong.
Originally posted by buster2010
Originally posted by jibeho
One small victory at a time.... Next come the attack dogs to have this judge's decision over turned.....
Short lived..
As it should be over turned. The judge chose to follow religion instead of the law.
Quite frankly, no he is not. Please explain how he is violating anyone's civil rights by not paying for birth control. I'll be interested to hear that.
Originally posted by kozmo
Originally posted by buster2010
Originally posted by jibeho
One small victory at a time.... Next come the attack dogs to have this judge's decision over turned.....
Short lived..
As it should be over turned. The judge chose to follow religion instead of the law.
What part of "Freedom OF Religion" confuses you??? Please read the Constitution and do so VERY carefully... it is Freedom OF Religion, NOT Freedom FROM Religion. Does that register with you?
No one is forcing anyone to take a job at Domino's. If one is dissatisfied with either the wages or benefits, they are free to leave and seek employment elsewhere. The federal government does NOT possess the right to force anyone to engage in any practice that violates their Freedom OF Religion - Capiche!?!?
If you disagree, please cite for me EXACTLY where in the Constitution I have it wrong.
Originally posted by buster2010
Originally posted by kozmo
Originally posted by buster2010
Originally posted by jibeho
One small victory at a time.... Next come the attack dogs to have this judge's decision over turned.....
Short lived..
As it should be over turned. The judge chose to follow religion instead of the law.
What part of "Freedom OF Religion" confuses you??? Please read the Constitution and do so VERY carefully... it is Freedom OF Religion, NOT Freedom FROM Religion. Does that register with you?
No one is forcing anyone to take a job at Domino's. If one is dissatisfied with either the wages or benefits, they are free to leave and seek employment elsewhere. The federal government does NOT possess the right to force anyone to engage in any practice that violates their Freedom OF Religion - Capiche!?!?
If you disagree, please cite for me EXACTLY where in the Constitution I have it wrong.
Show me in the constitution where is says a company is a person? Companies do not have the right to freedom of religion.