Originally posted by Evil_Santa
What would have been the outcome for the parents who don't have $75,000 handy to pay legal fees?

Totally disgusting, and those walmart employees should be fired. They've clearly shown they lack the understanding required to distinguish between child porn and family photography.

Originally posted by Char-Lee
Personally I would feel the horror of people thinking I did something like sell pictures of my kids but i would be glad someone gives a darn about the kids too. An employee would not set off an alarm if the pictures were as sweet and as the article shows. imo

Originally posted by wingsfan
Just when you think you finally seen it all in another thread, then you get this. What flipping planet does someone come from that doesn't know about these types of family photos? We can assume the wal-mart worker was of suspect IQ, that goes without saying, but law enforcement actual carrying out medical exams for abuse? And then putting them on the registry?

All involved should be sued to hell in back, then sued again for ruining our country with this endless insanity.

Originally posted by SpaDe_

Originally posted by Char-Lee

You don't assume anything... you protect the kids. Have you seen the evidence.

No, and neither have you. You don't blindly "protect the kids" based on your point of view. What about the point of view of the children? You do realize that these children were ripped from their family correct? How in gods name is traumatizing these children by removing them from their parents home in any way "protecting the kids" when there was nothing wrong done in the first place?

People that immediately assume the worst and defend their position to death make me sick. What happened to properly investigating a situation before acting? I guess many are right that here in Amerika you are now guilty until proven innocent. Hope that the next family is as well off as this one or they might just permanently lose their children because of some schmucks assumptions.

Originally posted by Char-Lee

When did YOU see the photos in question? Now all of you are judging the worker and her bosses and the child protective persons all in the wrong and YOU never saw the photos in question!

Originally posted by AnonyWarp

You don't assume anything... you protect the kids.

In order to protect the kids, lets now ban all devices able to capture / record an image.

Originally posted by Char-Lee

Yes well if you has sick parents maybe you would feel differently.

Who is going to stop them if they are selling pictures of you...do you think that is a parents right?

Child pornography on the Internet is another growing problem.

Originally posted by Char-Lee

What do you think the system is for? Why do you think it even exists? They are the ones who saw the evidence and tried to do their job! I don't need to see it to know that. Every time they ere on the side of not protecting a kid and something goes wrong what happens?

Later the kids are older and come forward and say, where were you when it was reported to you you did nothing!

Originally posted by wingsfan

Originally posted by Char-Lee

When did YOU see the photos in question? Now all of you are judging the worker and her bosses and the child protective persons all in the wrong and YOU never saw the photos in question!

No I didn't, but the judge didn't see the porn connection and since I assume most everyones parents take these types of photos, I would expect innocent till proven guilty to stand, not let's fiddle your kids in the exam room till we know for sure.