It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Creep Thumper
People shouldn't be taking naked photos of their kids. It's weird.
What is the purpose? A picture with their clothes on isn't good enough?
A Maricopa County Superior Court judge ruled that the photographs were not, in fact, pornographic, and a medical exam revealed no signs of sexual abuse. The girls were returned to their parents.
Originally posted by Char-Lee
The sad thing to me, is a caring person and their boss who gained nothing but tried to protect kids will never try again.
What would have been the outcome for the parents who don't have $75,000 handy to pay legal fees? Totally disgusting, and those walmart employees should be fired. They've clearly shown they lack the understanding required to distinguish between child porn and family photography.
Are bathtime photos child pornography? 7:00 am September 21, 2009, by Theresa Walsh Giarrusso A couple in Arizona had their three children taken away from them for taking partially nude bathtime photos of their kids. The couple was never charged with any crime and did get their children back. They are now suing the state and the Walmart that turned their photos over to the police.
“Neither parent was charged with sexual abuse and they regained custody of their children, but the Demarees say the incident inflicted lasting harm.”
Originally posted by AnonyWarp
A Maricopa County Superior Court judge ruled that the photographs were not, in fact, pornographic, and a medical exam revealed no signs of sexual abuse. The girls were returned to their parents.
what do you want ?
you want the parents jailed, thats it ?
i dont understand you point of view, honestly.
Originally posted by SpaDe_
Originally posted by Char-Lee
Personally I would feel the horror of people thinking I did something like sell pictures of my kids but i would be glad someone gives a darn about the kids too. An employee would not set off an alarm if the pictures were as sweet and as the article shows. imo
Really? You do realize this world is full of functional retards right? Just look at the daily headlines for christ sake! Do you not recall a recent headline when a school went on lockdown because of the fresh prince of bel air's theme song? Yeah keep up the faith in people like that!
Have you ever even been in a Wal-mart? I don't trust half the employees there to know how to properly stock a shelf let alone make a judgement call such as this!
Originally posted by Char-Lee
The sad thing to me, is a caring person and their boss who gained nothing but tried to protect kids will never try again.
Originally posted by Char-Lee
Originally posted by AnonyWarp
A Maricopa County Superior Court judge ruled that the photographs were not, in fact, pornographic, and a medical exam revealed no signs of sexual abuse. The girls were returned to their parents.
what do you want ?
you want the parents jailed, thats it ?
i dont understand you point of view, honestly.
They went through the proper process, the children were protected, the parents were found not to be abusing...that should be what everyone wants.
They went through the proper process, the children were protected
Originally posted by Char-Lee
This story is from 2009
Can't see why you bring it up even...clearly the tiny bit of "trauma' involved was more then paid for by the poor workers store.
Originally posted by Creep Thumper
Don't take naked pictures of your kids and you won't have a problem.
Don't take naked pictures of your kids and you won't have a problem.
Originally posted by ollncasino
Originally posted by Char-Lee
The sad thing to me, is a caring person and their boss who gained nothing but tried to protect kids will never try again.
Is much of the problem not that nowadays a climate of fear and distrust has been promoted by child protection agencies, feminists and the media to look upon any man as a likely pedophile?
About one in 10 kids!
Myth: Child sexual abuse is a rare experience. Fact: Child sexual abuse is not rare. Retrospective research indicates that as many as 1 out of 4 girls and 1 out of 6 boys will experience some form of sexual abuse before the age of 18. 1 However, because child sexual abuse is by its very nature secretive, many of these cases are never reported. Myth: A child is most likely to be sexually abused by a stranger. Fact: Children are most often sexually abused by someone they know and trust. Approximately three quarters of reported cases of child sexual abuse are committed by family members or other individuals who are considered part of the victim’s “circle of trust.”2
Non-touching behaviors can include voyeurism (trying to look at a child’s naked body), exhibitionism, or exposing the child to pornography. A
www.nctsn.org...