Originally posted by Char-Lee
Originally posted by redhorse
Originally posted by Char-Lee
Originally posted by ollncasino
Originally posted by Char-Lee
You don't assume anything... you protect the kids. Have you seen the evidence.
They didn't protect the kids. They traumatized the kids and subjected them to a genital examination.
The kids didn't need protecting from the parents - they needed protected from the Child Protection agency.
Yes well if you has sick parents maybe you would feel differently. Who is going to stop them if they are selling pictures of you...do you think that is a parents right? The persons who saw the photos clearly found them extreme. YOU did not see them!
And neither did YOU.
And yet... In spite of what a judge ruled, you will assume the worst based on...? A Wal-Mart (see something say something mentality) employees over-reaction. Okaaaayyy....
I'll go with the judge. But hey... We all have our baggage I guess. Besides it's more fun to jump up and down all indignant than actually think something through.
I only pray the judge did the right thing and the girls are ok for real.
Most Mothers don't even know when the father is abusing the children, may be innocent to her and not to him. I would not take that chance with my daughters.
Suggesting that mothers do not sexually abuse their own or others children.
You make so much noise here going against the judge who deemed the pictures being of innocent nature shouting that these pictures were not of innocent nature, pictures that were made with the mother present which according to you are to explicit to post anywhere and brought to walmart for development by the mother. But yet you only point to the father , THE MAN as your potential pedo.
Lets asume that you are correct about the pictures for a minute. Reading your responses and who you point to (the father) then if it were up to you those children would still be in the hands of the mother who , reading the case, still has as much potential as the father. If you are right then in all likelyhood they were both into it.
But hey lets lock up the man and pretend the mom is ok just because she is a woman. Nevermind the actual risk that those kids are still in the hands of a pedo (the woman). Hell she might even find another man to "share" her kids with and continue to satisfy her kink or fetish or w/e you want to call it.
www.trutv.com...
she taught Sunday school classes, Huckaby was a trusted member of the community. She would look after other kids for parents
The police questioned her father, Daniel Cantu, who had not seen the little girl for nearly a year. Two men were described as "persons of interest," their vehicles towed and searched, ultimately turning up nothing.
Did a Sunday school teacher with no history of violence, who was a mother herself, really rape and kill this little girl in the church and pack her in a rolling suitcase before driving in her own car, a purple KIA, to dump the body in that pond?
Yep she did
Huckaby was indicted on five counts on August 17 including: kidnapping, murder, lewd or lascivious acts with a child, and rape with a foreign object. The latter two charges qualify as "special circumstances" in the state of California. If convicted, she could face the death penalty.
A mother of a 4 year old girl who was a teacher killed and raped a 8 year old girl with a freakin rolling pin no less.
Most Mothers don't even know when the father is abusing the children, may be innocent to her and not to him. I would not take that chance with my daughters.
Go ahead , dismiss females and take your chances with some woman with a good rep.
