It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
To sew dissent within any group. one need only plant the suggestion that members of the group may be interlopers or agents-provocateur.
Originally posted by XaphanThey will always be a very new member to ATS and have no avatar, very few posts, very few stars. Their mini profile beside their posts looks very incomplete. When you check their post history you can see that they joined very recently and have only been posting in threads that are specific to one topic only,
Nine times out of Ten, anyone getting labeled as a "plant", shill, dis-info agent, and any other variation of, is only labeled that way for disagreeing with another poster.
Originally posted by Anusuia
reply to post by MagicWand67
Thats a bit taxing to do . it was a real effort just to get some colour up and now i went and clicked on background profile pix
So have we worked together as an example of thread derailing trolls ?
So have we worked together as an example of thread derailing trolls ?
Originally posted by beezzer
Does it matter?
Does it matter if a poster is just a pro-NWO type sitting at home vs a paid disinfo specialist sitting in a government office?
Either way, their debate tactics will run similar to each other and any anti-NWO types will have to argue the same points.
Just keepin' it real, folks.
Originally posted by guanyu
It's not about being noticed, it's about derailing conversation about the OP.
Originally posted by Evil_Santa[/i
I ask this because i'm often called a shill, disinfo agent, mindless drone, etc - on here and by others who are heavy into conspiracy theories. The irony is that with my past (mental illness) there is no chance of me getting a in the government with any form of secrecy, so to think that I am hired for the purpose of being a secret agent to push a government agenda is pretty absurd.
What I have noticed from a hard-line conspiracy theory group, is that ANYONE who hold different views from that group is automatically called any of the above names. It's sad to see happen, because that group is trying to define their own reality, claiming some kind of moral - and intellectual - superiority, where they demand recognition for their views. And the entire time they're doing that, they are dismissing anyone who has opposing view's experiences, opinions and thoughts on life.
If you've ever looked closely at JFK assassination research, you can see how certain areas seem to be no-go areas and anything that's revealed in those areas is quickly plagued with disinformation and sidetracking. The technology is different these days, but the end goal remains the same. Look at how McAdams and Bugliosi go after JFK conspiracy theorists. McAdams uses a website and shows up in discussions on other websites. Bugliosi used a book. The information they presented was just as easy to debunk as that of the 'conspiracy theorists'. It makes me wonder if they are paid to distract, distort, and keep any investigation from touching some sensitive areas where the CIA doesn't want them to go.