posted on Feb, 19 2013 @ 04:52 AM
Another very relevant thing to consider. To sew dissent within any group. one need only plant the suggestion that members of the group may be
interlopers or agents-provocateur. Once that seed is firmly implanted within the group, as a whole, a cascade effect then occurs where dissenting
opinions are no longer truly looked at upon their own merits, instead they are dismissed offhandedly with the thought "Yup, that there is one of them
This also plays into each individuals natural ego, which predisposes all of us to believe that what we think, or perceive, has to be correct ( even
when it is not ). Therefore anyone who does not share our perspective is either insane or driven by agenda. Throw the disinfo label into the mix and
that is all we require to lock ourselves into our own beliefs - all with a seemingly very valid reason for being obtuse and stubborn. After all -
it's no longer a matter of who is accurate vs inaccurate. Now it's the truth fighting against vicious and evil lies.
What I am personally sure of. That we are watched. Not just ATS. Not just conspiracy sites or alternative news boards. All digital communications are.
This much, I believe, is supported by some pretty heavy evidence. I am also personally pretty positive that there are agent provocateurs online. Just
a cursory look at the election threads, from a few months back, can pretty much serve to show that there were people who signed up, pursued an agenda
( paid to, ordered to, or not ) and then vanished with the sunset on election night.
What I am never sure of is the intent these posters might have.
I'll use one hot button issue to illustrate. Sandy Hook. There is a lot of supposition, it seems, that anyone who thinks Sandy Hook is not a false
flag - must be a disinformation agent. If I had a dollar for every post I have seen to that effect? Well it'd be enough to buy that high end gaming
system I drool while dreaming of. But what if the agenda driven, paid or ordered posters are not here to cover up a false flag event... what if they
are here to procreate a lie? To stir the pot of dissent? To anger the masses into reacting in a hyperbolic and irrational manner? All as a means to
justify some draconian law that is already drafted and waiting for an excuse to be introduced?
We know the the Feds who infiltrated Occupy did not show up trying to convince the Occupy members that they were wrong or overreacting. They
infiltrated and then tried to spur the mob into behaving in an illegal and dangerous manner so that the Government would have cause to stop the
With espionage it's never black and white. One always has to explore all potentials.