Originally posted by nicepants
Where is the physical evidence of explosives? Where are the people who saw explosive devices? Where are the whistleblowers who refused to be a part
of the plot?
It has been proved over and over that it's impossible for office fires to globally collapse the towers. There is no need for the detailed proof you
require. Use a little common sense and logic, if it was impossible for office fires to cause global collapse (a fact) then what do you suggest
did?
De-bunkers dance around the facts and want to argue irrelevant points that make no real difference to the fact that fire alone could
not have
caused the global collapse we see.
So if it wasn't the fire, and it wasn't damage from the plane impacts (even NIST agree with this) then what do
you suggest it was? Allah?
Do you really think the official story is true just because you think there have been no whistle-blowers? Well there have been whistle-blowers, you
just haven't looked hard enough...
www.homelandstupidity.us...
But even so that's a lame excuse to ignore the obvious. Forget whistle-blowers just look at the physics.
