It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Bombs in the Building: World Trade Center 'Conspiracy Theory' is a Conspiracy Fact

page: 1
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in


posted on May, 8 2003 @ 01:04 PM
Bombs in the Building: World Trade Center 'Conspiracy Theory' is a Conspiracy Fact

By Randy Lavello

By now the misinformation and ignored findings surrounding the September 11, 2001 attacks have evaporated the official version into the land of fiction. Didn't it seem strange that we learned everything of the government version by the next day? Much has been learned about the attacks, yet the official version has never changed; it seems as though our government thinks the point moot since it used this excuse to pass unconstitutional laws and wage wars resulting in oil profits. The time has come to admit the sorry truth as a nation, so that we can move on - as a nation.

The planes did not bring those towers down; bombs did. So why use planes? It seems they were a diversionary tactic- a grand spectacle. Who would want to divert our attention from the real cause of the collapse of those towers? It must be those who benefited most from these attacks. Let's recount some facts of that dreadful day.

Any time an aircraft deviates from it's course, the air traffic controller requests a military intercept according to military response code 7610-4J. This was the first time interceptors were not sent up in the history of this policy. The intercept pilots are trained to make a visual check of the cockpit. could this be the reason these interceptors were intercepted? Planes were sent to the New York area, after unprecedented delay, from Falmouth, Massachusetts rather than nearby Ft. Dix or Laguardia. Of course, they didn't arrive in time - there was no visual scan of the cockpits.

Captain Kent Hill, retired from the Air Force, explained that the U.S. had flown unmanned aircraft, similar in size to a Boeing 737, on preprogrammed flight paths from Edwards Air Force Base, California to Australia on several occasions. He believes the airliners used in the attacks had their on board computers knocked out and were subsequently choreographed by an Airborne Warning and Control System. Along side Captain Hill, an Air Force officer with more than 100 sorties in Vietnam stated, 'Those birds either had a crack fighter pilot in the left seat, or they were being maneuvered by remote control.' We know that the technology exists to fly hijacked commercial airliners by remote control - it's called 'Globalhawk.' We also know that the military has had an unmanned drone aircraft known as the 'Predator,' since 1994. A saboteur would merely have to reprogram the controls to switch from manual to remote; those airliners practically fly themselves already with the autopilot. This would require electronic security codes. acquisition of electronic codes would also explain the lapse of interceptor response due to sabotage. Furthermore, it's a fact that Air Force One codes were known and punched in by a rogue source on 9/11, proving the presence of an inside, subversive element.

As usual, it's not a good conspiracy, if it doesn't involve a Bush! Introducing Marvin Bush - brother of George Jr. Marvin is a substantial shareholder and was on the Board of Directors until 2000 of a security company aptly named Securacom. This is not an ordinary security force with canvas badges and walkie-talkies; it's an electronic security company, which was 'coincidentally' involved with Dulles Airport until 1998. Handling electronic security at Dulles seems like an excellent way to gain access to Air Traffic Control communication codes with NORAD, which is in charge of intercept missions. According to CEO Barry McDaniel, the company 'handled some of the security at the World Trade Center up to the day the buildings fell down.' How convenient, huh? Bombs were in those towers. Bush's presidency was saved by these attacks - just something to think about.

Five of the twenty 'suicide hijackers' are alive and well according to the BBC and they want their names cleared. So who was flying those planes? We may never know exactly what happened with those jets; what we do know is that the official version crumbles under scrutiny. These planes were merely a diversion, as proven by the presence of bombs. that's right, PROVEN!

Before beginning this article, I met Auxiliary Lieutenant Fireman and former Auxiliary Police Officer, Paul Isaac Jr. at the World Trade Center Memorial. Paul, along with many other firemen, is very upset about the obvious cover-up and he is on a crusade for answers and justice. He was stationed at Engine 10, across the street from the World Trade Center in 1998 and 99; Engine 10 was entirely wiped out in the destruction of the towers. He explained to me that, "many other firemen know there were bombs in the buildings, but they're afraid for their jobs to admit it because the 'higher-ups' forbid discussion of this fact." Paul further elaborated that former CIA director Robert Woolsey, as the Fire Department's Anti-terrorism Consultant, is sending a gag order down the ranks. "There were definitely bombs in those buildings," he told me. He explained to me that, if the building had 'pancaked' as it's been called, the falling floors would have met great resistance from the steel support columns, which would have sent debris flying outward into the surrounding blocks. I asked him about the trusses, and quoted the history channel's 'don't trust a truss' explanation for the collapses. He responded in disbelief, and told me, "You could never build a truss building that high. A slight wind would knock it over! Those buildings were supported by reinforced steel. Building don't just implode like that; this was a demolition."

Just after the disaster, Firefighter Louie Cacchioli said, "We think there were bombs set in the building." Notice he said 'we'. At 9:04, just after flight 175 collided with the South Tower, a huge explosion shot 550 feet into the air from the U.S. Customs House known as WTC 6. A huge crater scars the ground where this building once stood. Something blew up WTC 6 - it wasn't a plane; it must have been a bomb of some sort.

The seismic record from Columbia University's observatory in Palisades, NY (21 miles away) provides indisputable proof that massive explosions brought down those towers. At the precise moment the South Tower began collapsing, a 2.1 earthquake registered on the seismograph. At the precise moment the North Tower began collapsing, a 2.3 earthquake registered; however, as the buildings started to crumble these waves disappeared. The two 'spikes'on the seismograph, which both occurred at the exact instants the collapses began, are twenty times the amplitude, or more than 100 times the force of the other waves. If the buildings had simply collapsed, the largest jolts would have occurred when the massive debris struck the earth, not at the beginnings of the collapses. Seismologist Arthur Lerner-Lam of Columbia University stated, "Only a small fraction of the energy from the collapsing towers was converted into ground motion. The ground shaking that resulted from the collapse of the towers was extremely small." In other words, the collapsing did not cause 2.1 and 2.3 magnitude earthquakes. Furthermore, a 'sharp spike of short duration' is how underground nuclear explosions register on seismographs. Underground explosions, where the steel columns meet Manhattans granite would account for both the demolition-style implosions and these 'spikes' on the seismograph. Another seismologist at the Palisades observatory, Won Young Kim said the 1993 truck bomb did not even register on their seismographs because the explosion was 'not coupled' to the ground. Imagine the magnitude of explosions it would take to register the two earthquakes, when the truck bomb didn't even show up.

The American Free Press reported that in the basements of the collapsed towers, where 47 central support columns (per building) connected with the bedrock, hot spots of 'literally molten steel' were discovered more than a month after the attack. There is only one explanation for this: An explosion of unprecedented magnitude destroyed the bases of the columns, then the massive structures buried the impact points, trapping the intense heat below for all that time.

The tower which was struck second suffered less damage from the plane because it was a less direct hit and most of the jet fuel was seen ignited outside the structure. yet this tower collapsed first. Just before this collapse, the firefighters were up on the burning levels and were heard saying, "Battalion seven. Ladder fifteen, we've got two isolated pockets of fire. We should be able to knock it down with two lines." How could two isolated pockets of fire destroy the bases of the support columns causing the buildings to implode? Paul Isaac told me, "Based on video footage of the collapse of the South Tower, the structural collapse is not consistent with the angle the building was struck."

Why was no investigation permitted of the debris? Dr W. Gene Corley headed the FEMA sponsored engineering assessment of the World Trade Center collapse, which performed no tests on the steel for traces of explosives. When asked about this process known as 'twinning,' he responded, "I am not a metallurgist." Dr. Corley also 'investigated' the debris at Waco and Oklahoma City. and we all know how thoroughly those 'investigations' were performed.

No government agency performed forensic examinations of the rubble; no effort was made to validate their official story. The rubble was quickly =
loaded onto ships and delivered to China for smelting. These are the action=
s of criminals disposing of evidence! By these actions, FEMA proves itself =
to be a subversive element in our government!

Former Deputy Director of the FBI, John P. O'Neil stated, "The main obstacles to investigate Islamic terrorism were U.S. oil corporate interests and the role played by Saudi Arabia in it." Can you think of anyone (Bush) linked to both wealthy Saudi Arabians and U.S. corporate oil? John O'Neil resigned from the FBI after 31 years of service after Barbara Bodine, currently part of the Iraqi transition team, barred him from following up his investigation of the attack on the U.S.S Cole. He took a job heading security at the World Trade Center. his first day of work - September 11, 2001. John O'Neil received the job from Jerome Howard, Former Director of the New York Office of Emergency Management, who happened to have the day off on 9/11. We may only speculate on the case of Mr. O'Neil, but he does seem to be a person which U.S. oil corporate interests would want out of the way. especially during these wars for oil and power in Iraq and Afghanistan.

The top FBI officials in Minneapolis called off investigations of Zacarais Moussaoui, causing bitter resentment among field agents. The man who made the decision not to investigate was promoted! Israeli intelligence agents lived next to the alleged hijackers in Hollywood, Florida. The 'hijackers' were trained at U.S. government flight schools. Insider training on Uni=
ted Airlines leads to the conclusion that there was foreknowledge of these attacks; it also establishes that those with this foreknowledge are, at least, relatively wealthy. Another suspicious finding is that the World Trade Center was sold to Vornado Realty Trust in February, seven months prior to the attacks for 3.25 billion dollars. this doesn't prove anything, it's merely suspicious.

Who gained the most from the attacks of September 11th? Who had the motive? An Israeli expert on terrorism at the Hebrew University in Jerusalem, Ehud Sprinzak said, "From the perspective of Jews, it is the most important public relations act ever committed in our favor." David Stern, an expert on Israeli intelligence operations stated, "This attack required a high l=
evel of military precision and the resources of an advanced intelligence agency. In addition, the attackers would have needed to be extremely familiar with both Air Force One flight operations, civil airline flight paths, and aerial assault tactics on sensitive U.S. cities like Washington." He elaborated that the attacks "serve no Arab group or nation's interest, but their timing came in the midst of international condemnation of Israel." He goes on to claim "A U.S. military intelligence report revealed details of an international intelligence memo linking Mossad to the World Trade Center and Pentagon attacks. The memo was in circulation three weeks before the attacks."

Furthering the suspicion of Mossad involvement, five Israelis were seen atop a van smiling and celebrating, while taking videos of the disaster from across the Hudson River. These five were arrested by the FBI and detained for two months before being deported back to Israel. Two of these men were positively identified as Israeli intelligence agents. Eighty-one nations are represented among the World Trade Center's dead - Israel is not one of these nations even though approximately 1200 of its citizens worked there. As if that wasn't enough, an instant messaging firm in Israel, named Odigo, received warnings about the towers two hours before the attacks. Everyone who points out the wrongdoings of Israel is immediately labeled 'anti-Semitic'. well, the truth knows no race or religion - it's just the truth. These aren't Jews carrying out these plans; it's merely sick animals who hide behind the Jews! = describes David Rockefeller as the 'Visionary behind the World Trade Center.' He pushed the construction of these towers through major opposition with the aid of his brother, then governor, Nelson Rockefeller. David has been quoted as saying, "We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order." Was this the 'right major crisis' to advance the aims of a global government?

There is overwhelming evidence to support the findings that these alleged Arab terrorists were merely scapegoats used to advance the World Government agend. During the attacks, 'President' George Jr. was reading a book with school children about goats! (Scapegoats?) Arab terrorists did not carry out these attacks which were detrimental to the Muslim world.

All evidence points to elements inside, high atop the governments of Israel and the United States. Those wishing to implement their world government through their control over finance, media and militaries are guilty of these most heinous crimes. This atrocity is proving to advance the domestic police state agendas and consolidate the Middle East's oil reserves. The people who most benefited from these attacks are the wealthiest, most privileged and powerful men on earth who feel they will finally be able to hold dominion over the nations of the world through their New World Order. For some of these globalists, these attacks were merely a means to an end - a huge step toward ruling a world socialist system. But for others, likely the planners of such a vile crime, this was a mass sacrifice to themselves. This mass ritual sacrifice of the vulnerable and the heroes who tried to save them was perpetrated by power crazed freaks who are simply - satanic.

The World Trade Center Demolition and the So-Called War on Terrorism

Permission to reprint this article is granted providing the original author is cited and a link to PRISON is included. The views expressed in this article may not necessarily be those of Alex Jones or Paul Joseph Watson.

[Edited on 8-5-2003 by All Seeing Eye]

[Edited on 8-5-2003 by All Seeing Eye]

[Edited on 8-5-2003 by All Seeing Eye]

Mod eidt: to remove code from title and link to site at page bottom.

[edit on 25-9-2004 by UM_Gazz]

posted on May, 8 2003 @ 01:51 PM
Yes, many key words pop up in this little piece: Israel, Mossad, and Zionism. When thinking of September 11, Israel comes forefront to the mind. Enraging america against the entire muslim world has limitless benefits. They now have the most powerful nation in the world drooling and foaming like a rabid dog sicking all ther enemies in the middle east. Iraq was a threat to israel. Syria and iran are both major thorns in israels side. And notice the Israelis goading and pushing us to take them both out........

Yes, many motives for 9/11, not all of them bush related. The semi fascist zionists have much to gain as well.

posted on May, 8 2003 @ 06:58 PM
How can we spread the news so justice happens. I have read many articles on this, but i have not come to a solution to this problem.

Is there any law that demands evidence to be gone over again. There must be something we can do. Please justice needs to be served.

posted on May, 8 2003 @ 07:03 PM
When I saw the towers calapsing, it was too perfect. They fell exactly the way a controlled implosion would have. I can't find the article, but I'm sure someone here has an idea.

Found the article;

[Edited on 9-5-2003 by ADVISOR]

posted on May, 8 2003 @ 07:14 PM
It was like if it was like a demolition or something.

posted on May, 8 2003 @ 07:32 PM

Originally posted by MorbidAngel2010
It was like if it was like a demolition or something.

posted on May, 8 2003 @ 07:44 PM

Originally posted by ilovepizza
How can we spread the news so justice happens. I have read many articles on this, but i have not come to a solution to this problem.

Is there any law that demands evidence to be gone over again. There must be something we can do. Please justice needs to be served.

Well if the evil ones will kill thousands to stop just one man, then what will they do to stop many???? That is what you need to ask yourself. For Mr. O'neil was the REAL target here. He was the one seeking the truth. So what will they do to us???

This is a great article and it is all true. The Israeli spies in Hollywood, Florida lived at 4600 block while the so-called 'terrorists' lived 3600. Some thing like that. It was close but not next door. Other than that everything in that report checks out to me. Anyone else???

posted on May, 8 2003 @ 11:40 PM
I remember reading somewhere that many of the firefighters who were in the buildings heard what they thought were many explosions.

posted on May, 8 2003 @ 11:44 PM
"I remember reading somewhere that many of the firefighters who were in the buildings heard what they thought were many explosions."

I heard the same thing.

posted on May, 8 2003 @ 11:49 PM
I am not scared of them. I would rather have justice, then live a life of fear. I do not want to live in a country where stuff like this happens, and people who know the truth are told to keep hush hush on it. You can not hush me. We need to spread the word, do not be afraid to spread it.

Fear only controls people if they let it. Do not give in to that fear.

posted on May, 9 2003 @ 02:12 AM
I heard same thing as well. The New York Fire Fighter Department is pissed off because the mayor blocked and frustrated to attempts to start an investigation into why the towers collapsed.

I too thought the destruction looked like an implosion, I have seen two controlled demolitions of large buildinsg before, and demolitions of smaller ones. The neatness in which the towers collapsed was very clean.

The truth, as I said, will come out in 50 or 100 years when people no longer care

posted on May, 9 2003 @ 02:28 AM
If a time comes when people no longer care about thousands dieing in a co-ordinated attack against the global populace, even 50-1million yrs we would deserve every bit of it. Everyone knows our government has a part in it, even if that part goes back 20 yrs with our CIA training the Hezbola or how US Army advisors over saw operations traing the columbians. Sad as it is to say, the supposed greatest nation has bloody hands. And the blood is everyones.

posted on May, 9 2003 @ 02:34 AM
There isnt a nation, race, or ethnic group alive today that doesnt have blood on its hands.

I am reminded of Frank herberts Dune novels......victory is often acjieved at a great moral price, it is the victors that breed, thus, all of us alive today are here because our ancestors did some very evil and barbaric things.

Thus, there are no innocents.

posted on May, 9 2003 @ 02:39 AM
to say that it wasnt blown up from inside would be ludecrise (i know i cant spell) if you watch the video footage of it colapsing you can clearly see where the colapse begins, and it isnt where the planes hit, now a plane colliding with a building is gona cause some structual damage but it doesnt cause that much structual damge that far down the building, wathing the footage reminds me of the game 'Jenga' where you remove pieces from the bottom and place them on the top of the structure, and when it collase it tilts then falls down on it self. much like the trade centre building did.

posted on May, 9 2003 @ 03:01 AM
The first thing we can do is to take ilovepizza's advice and not live in fear, that is what they want. When you have a nation wrapped up in fear, hatred, anger (these are things of the dark side, little Star Wars humor for ya there) it merely completes whatever side of the agenda these people in charge want. To divide and conquer. Another thing we need to do is stop fighting with each other and realize that somethin else is going on. To realize and wake up that our freedoms are being taken away for this kinda stuff. Another thing to do is pass this information on, make sure people know about it. Knowledge is power.

a lot of information here first hand account of what happened. I suggest that you find your own resources on this to see if there's more like this one.

Another great link here, with a TON of info!

I'm still looking for a great link I had about the collapse of the two towers. When I find it again I'll definitely post it. But I would highly recommend checking these sites out. The gov holding more 'simulated' terror attacks.

I'm not sure if I buy the entire explosions on the insides of the tower. I'm a bit 50/50 on it. Outside of some either really good speakers, and or actual engineers saying that in a normal controlled demolition buildings dont fall that good like these ones did. With the whole molten steel found several stories underground doesnt add up to me either.

[Edited on 9-5-2003 by Grommer]

posted on May, 9 2003 @ 03:22 AM
Here are a few decent links I found

those are taken from the bottem left of this site

it proves to be a decent resource, wonder if it will vanish or be edited like some pages have.

posted on Sep, 24 2004 @ 11:59 AM
The truth, as I said, will come out in 50 or 100 years when people no longer care

Does everybody care now? I don't think so. Except those who lived through it and those few who really care. Americans care about themselves and their money, after all that is what we are taught from the time we are ale to understand our way of life. All who know me think I am crazy for I believe in the demolition and coverup of the WTC. Oh well!I also believe that if it looks as if GW is going to lose the election there will be a large terror attack allowing the cancelling of the elections under the Patriot Act. Only time will tell.

posted on Sep, 24 2004 @ 12:54 PM
There is so much info about Marvin Bush and his connections to WTC, United Airlines, and Dulles International Airport and no one pays any attention to any of it is beyond me.

New York Firefighters Telling of 911 Controlled Demolition ,

9/11 Security Courtesy of Marvin Bush

Marvin P. Bush, the presidents younger brother, was a principal in a company called Securacom that provided security for the World Trade Center, United Airlines, and Dulles International Airport. The company, Burns noted, was backed by KuwAm, a Kuwaiti-American investment firm on whose board Marvin Bush also served. [Utne]

According to its present CEO, Barry McDaniel, the company had an ongoing contract to handle security at the World Trade Center "up to the day the buildings fell down."

The company lists as government clients "the U.S. Army, U.S. Navy, U.S Air force, and the Department of Justice," in projects that "often require state-of-the-art security solutions for classified or high-risk government sites."
Stratesec (Securacom) differs from other security companies which separate the function of consultant from that of service provider. The company defines itself as a "single-source" provider of "end-to-end" security services, including everything from diagnosis of existing systems to hiring subcontractors to installing video and electronic equipment. It also provides armored vehicles and security guards.

The Dulles Internation contract is another matter. Dulles is regarded as "absolutely a sensitive airport," according to security consultant Wayne Black, head of a Florida-based security firm, due to its location, size, and the number of international carriers it serves.

Black has not heard of Stratesec, but responds that for one company to handle security for both airports and airlines is somewhat unusual. It is also delicate for a security firm serving international facilities to be so interlinked with a foreign-owned company: "Somebody knew somebody," he suggested, or the contract would have been more closely scrutinized.

As Black points out, "when you [a company] have a security contract, you know the inner workings of everything." And if another company is linked with the security company, then "What's on your computer is on their computer." [American Reporter]

Bush-Linked Company Handled Security for the WTC, Dulles and United

Marvin Bush
911dossier notes 25.1.2003:

For those who do not accept the Official Story on the collapse of the Twin Towers, this article is a minor smoking gun. It explains their biggest problem: if the Towers were brought down with explosives how could anyone get them in. Step in Marvin Bush whose company installed the security system...

posted on Sep, 24 2004 @ 08:47 PM

I'll admit that I didn't read the whole thing, but the following statement jumped out at me as odd:

"Eighty-one nations are represented among the World Trade Centers dead - Israel is not one of these nations even though approximately 1200 of its citizens worked there."

hmmm...I found a September 11th Victims site that lists deaths by nationality. Nowhere near 81 nations represented (less than 40) and 2 Israeli citizens WERE included.

If I could find this hole in his article in 5 minutes of web surfing, I'm
skeptical about anything he has to say.

(BTW, I emailed him this finding - I'll let you know if he responds)

[edit on 9/24/2004 by HoonieSkoba]

posted on Sep, 24 2004 @ 08:59 PM
hoonie, nice find. the israeli absence is a myth that has been heard since 9/12. it's b.s., along with alot of the other stuff.

any article that purports to be telling news, especially of the nature and seriousness of 9/11 isn't going to make jokes about bush reading a book about goats (scapegoats) and still expect to be taken seriously.

top topics

<<   2  3  4 >>

log in