Bombs in the Building: World Trade Center 'Conspiracy Theory' is a Conspiracy Fact

reply to post by XxaudioholicxX

---

After all the data and facts available, its amazing these morons can still be in such incredible denial and state of ignorance... either that or they're apart of the equally disturbing cancer of disinformation agents who will in the future be hunted down along with the rest of the "ma bus" (see nostradamian terminology for definition) administration conspirators when the the truth finally makes it to the mainstream... and it will. Unfortunately though, there's too much stupidity in control at the moment and its far too late to stop the course this country is on. We past the point of no return the day this country invaded Iraq.

Someone should move the hands of the doomsday clock another minute... ooops,,, that would put it at 12midnight.

oh dear...

The conspiracy theory is just not plausible.

Suppose I were planning to blow up the towers with bombs. This is how I would do it: 1 - plant the bombs; 2 - blow them up; 3 - blame terrorists. Why in hell would you make it a million times more complicated than it needed to be when it makes it far more likely that you would be found out?

reply to post by Anonymous ATS

---

Reporting events before they actually happen isn't very plausible either, yet it happened...


The building the BBC reported as collapsed still stands behind the reporter. Interestingly, the BBC, usually well known for their meticulous record keeping, has since 'lost' the time coded originals for this broadcast. Scripted events or amazing ability to predict the collapse of the assumably structurally sound WTC 7? This is just one example of a myriad of cooincidences and anamolies we're expected to swallow in order for the official story to work.
Plausibility works both ways...

reply to post by Anonymous ATS

---

I would weigh your opinions more heavily if you would come out of the shadows of anonimity.

How is a CT not plausible?
The OS is a conspiracy theory.

Is it really that far-fetched to think that they were using recorded/looped video in the background?

Did you notice that it says live on the BBC screen 26 minutes early before demolition charges actually brought WTC 7 down? Maybe they set them off for Jane Standley; but there was an unaccounted for 26 minute delay? Did you know that CNN live also reported WTC 7 destroyed an hour early? What is so far-fetched about the 9-11 planners keeping their Mainstream News Media partners advised of the status of their operation. Wouldn't you like a heads-up once in a while from your mission members? Is it really that far-fetched that the BBC normally the finest record keepers, somehow managed to lose that damning piece of live video?

WTC 7 actually fell at 5:20 pm (22:20 GMT) The BBC reported it fallen at 21:54 GMT.

YouTube Link

YouTube Link

Not to mention the advanced warning received by Goulianni to get out of the building because it was going collapse. Plenty of videos circulating of Piloce Officers telling people to clear the area as well for the same reason... Going to Collapse.... How could they possibly know that?

If all that doesn't convince you, just look at WTC going down and ask yourself if it 'looks' like a fire related collapse, or a very carefully planned demolition...



Controlled Demolitions Inc. was contracted to clean up the site, FEMA was in NY sept. 10, some guy went around destorying the airline pilots tapes and depositing them into seperate trash cans despite direct orders to retain the material, Dancing and Vanishing Mossad Agents, Willie Brown being told by Condiliar Rice not to fly that day, the cooincidences go on and on and on...

www.abovetopsecret.com...
logic If ... Then...
If freefall in WTC7 then freefall in WTC1&2

Le

911 Thermite

Editor's Note

Below is the Abstract, Introduction and Conclusuions of this important article. The complete article can be downloaded (pdf)


Active Thermitic Material Discovered in Dust from the 9/11 World Trade Center Catastrophe
pp.7-31 (25) Authors: Niels H. Harrit, Jeffrey Farrer, Steven E. Jones, Kevin R. Ryan, Frank M. Legge, Daniel Farnsworth, Gregg Roberts, James R. Gourley, Bradley R. Larsen
doi: 10.2174/1874412500902010007


Complete Article

Abstract:
We have discovered distinctive red/gray chips in all the samples we have studied of the dust produced by the destruction of the World Trade Center. Examination of four of these samples, collected from separate sites, is reported in this paper. These red/gray chips show marked similarities in all four samples. One sample was collected by a Manhattan resident about ten minutes after the collapse of the second WTC Tower, two the next day, and a fourth about a week later. The properties of these chips were analyzed using optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray energy dispersive spectroscopy (XEDS), and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The red material contains grains approximately 100 nm across which are largely iron oxide, while aluminum is contained in tiny plate-like structures. Separation of components using methyl ethyl ketone demonstrated that elemental aluminum is present. The iron oxide and aluminum are intimately mixed in the red material. When ignited in a DSC device the chips exhibit large but narrow exotherms occurring at approximately 430 °C, far below the normal ignition temperature for conventional thermite. Numerous iron-rich spheres are clearly observed in the residue following the ignition of these peculiar red/gray chips. The red portion of these chips is found to be an unreacted thermitic material and highly energetic.




Excerpts
Complete Article


INTRODUCTION
The destruction of three skyscrapers (WTC 1, 2 and 7) on September 11, 2001 was an immensely tragic catastrophe that not only impacted thousands of people and families directly, due to injury and loss of life, but also provided the motivation for numerous expensive and radical changes in domestic and foreign policy. For these and other reasons, knowing what really happened that fateful day is of grave importance.
A great deal of effort has been put forth by various government-sponsored and -funded investigations, which led, in large part, to the reports released by FEMA [1] and NIST [2]. Other studies of the destruction have been less well publicized but are no less important to the outstanding obligation that remains to the victims of that tragedy, to determine the whole truth of the events of that day [3-10]. A number of these studies have appropriately focused attention on the remaining physical material, and on available photographs and video footage, as sources of evidence still in public hands, relating to the method of destruction of the three skyscrapers.
CONCLUSIONS
We have discovered distinctive red/gray chips in significant numbers in dust associated with the World Trade Center destruction. We have applied SEM/XEDS and other methods to characterize the small-scale structure and chemical signature of these chips, especially of their red component. The red material is most interesting and has the following characteristics:
1. It is composed of aluminum, iron, oxygen, silicon and carbon. Lesser amounts of other potentially reactive elements are sometimes present, such as potassium, sulfur, lead, barium and copper.
2. The primary elements (Al, Fe, O, Si, C) are typically all present in particles at the scale of tens to hundreds of nanometers, and detailed XEDS mapping shows intimate mixing.
3. On treatment with methyl ethyl ketone solvent, some segregation of components occurred. Elemental aluminum became sufficiently concentrated to be clearly identified in the pre-ignition material.
4. Iron oxide appears in faceted

It's amazing reading the first page of this thread. How far we have come.

Well... on the subject of bombs in the building(s), this thread references Core of Corruption, an excellent new video that deals with many of the issues raised in this thread.

I've never seen such a comprehensive collection of media clips proving conclusively that there were indeed bombs in the building.

Further, the evidence denoting Israeli/Mossad involvement gets a good airing.

And there's even a clip (not from the BBC!) in which the newscaster reports that WTC7 has collapsed and you can see it fall in the background just as she says it! They even remark on this!

Well worth a look.

Wrong. The 47 core columns were welded together end to end; some mechanism caused the welds to fail and shearing at the weld points. Perhaps some form of Tesla vibration wavelength. The 30 foot multi-ton columns were perfect lengths to quickly load on trucks and quickly remove from the public eye.

NIST Core Column Data

In this NIST taped meeting, NIST engineer John Gross denied there was WTC molten steel. Multiple eyewitnesses to the molten iron and this horseshoe bent core column proved the Lie.

NIST Engineer John Gross refused to give the individual his email so the NASA AVIIRIS hot spot images could be e-mailed to him, even though Gross asked him to during the meeting. NIST frauds and liars with an attitude of wilful ignorance.

YouTube Link

This 8-ton structural steel column (called I beam by narrator) was once straight, but is now curved into a horseshoe shape without stress cracks or buckling or tearing, by the intensive heat which formed the molten metal under the WTC.

Google Video Link

Google Video Link

Images of the World Trade Center Site Show Thermal Hot Spots on September 16 and 23, 2001

There's been alot of fresh bickering in the 9-11 forum... I thought that, for the benefit of a few in particular, this would be a worthy thread to bring back up. We've been at this for years, so when I see new members faceitously asking how long we've been 'twofers' and what kind of research we've put into all of this, well use your search function guys. We're not all noobs here, and some of us have put more reasearch than we care to recall into it.

reply to post by twitchy

---

I was going to use this for another thread but here we go;

From the archives at the top of the forum:

NBC 9-11-01
Eliot walker producer for "Today" show reports a secondary explosion.

George Shay (commuter) reports "I heard 2 explosions however. There was a first explosion that was louder then a second explosion"

Look at the big picture, evidence suggests something bad is OTW it's predicted, on going, on schedule, and 100% planned.

There is some objective evidence of Mossad / CIA involvement in this incident which indicates (not prove) Jack Bernsteins 1985 predictions (below) accurate. He was murdered. Link

Israel could trigger a large scale Mideast war, a large war which Israel could not win alone. Then the New York leg of the New York/Moscow/Tel Aviv Triangle would use its influence on the U.S. Government to send U.S. military forces to aid Israel.

Bernsteins added what would happen "next":

when the U.S. military is deeply involved and the U.S. citizens demoralized... International Bankers will make their move... and likely will, trigger an economic collapse in America — like they did in 1929

Then..

Since the money system currently used in the U.S. is not backed by gold, silver or anything of value, the paper dollars and tin coins now in use will be worthless. # In the resulting state of confusion and in an effort to obtain food and other necessities, the American people will accept the ‘New States Constitution’ which has already been written.

..and

"...International Bankers will likely create an economic collapse and throw the U.S. into a state of chaos."

Not bad for 1995, that sh#t is happening.

Constitution for the New states of America is real, and includes:

Article 1-A Sec.1 - "Freedom of expression shall not be abridged except in declared emergency."

Article 1A Sec.8 - "The practice of religion shall be privileged."

Article 1B Sec. 8 - "Bearing of arms shall be confined to the police, members of the armed forces, and those licensed under law."

Recall the Russian dude who recently predicted the US would break up into 10 states?

www.newswithviews.com...

Did you know?:

March 27, 1969, President Richard Nixon divided the country into 10 regions via the Government Reorganization Act. Then with Nixon’s Executive Order 11647, the nation was divided up into 10 administrative regions on February 14, 1972 (Federal Register February 12, 1972, Vol. 37, No. 30), which also established the Federal Regional Council for the newly designed 10 regions. Now, why did former President Richard Nixon redefine the United States? He did so because the United Nations passed a resolution that the United States must reorganize into 10 regions.

what if I told you that a new constitution was written at the same time the country was divided into 10 regions? Ever heard of the Proposed Constitution for the New states of America? In 1964, the Ford Foundation funded an outfit called the Center for the Study of Democratic Institutions to write a new constitution for our nation. After 40 drafts, a staff of 100+ people, and at a cost of 2.5 million dollars a year, a decade later (1974) the Proposed Constitution for the Newstates of America was finished.

Lets see it then.