reply to post by Mamatus
What do the Koch brothers have to do with Planetary cycles?? They may be rich..but hey, so is George Soros. Money doesn't make a God and that's what
they'd have to be. This whole thing is absurd.
If climate change by computer model is so accurate and "settled science" please, link just *ONE* ....just a SINGLE example of a computer generated
climate prediction with real dates back to when it was made for doom and gloom or even noticeable climate impact ...which turned out to actually
happen? Really, I'm dead serious. ONE will do.
Google has the date selection tool that will force limit this back as many years as you'd care to go, so finding predictions made in the 90's for what
bad things we'd see by 2010 and now isn't hard to find. It's an ACCURATE
one I'd love to see in negative, measurable
changes outside pure statistical variation
I was doing work for my geography course last night when I stumbled across maps compiled by explorers using the Imperial Library at Constantinople
that showed the Antarctic coastline ,,in detail. Now that alone is remarkable for a map written hundreds of years ago, going by source material dating
back before that. You know what stopped my breath and just about made me fall out of my chair? It was showing the LAND COASTLINE
. Not the
Explain that one....as I still can't and may do a thread on all this next week after talking to my Department head at the college about this. It's one
of those brain freeze moments, to say the very least. By what we know of dates, climate and age of observable data? That map shouldn't exist. It
shouldn't be possible for that time period...Ice OR Land in accurate detail.
We don't know squat about the VERY complex environment around us and to even play like we do and start initiating policy of changes to "counter" what
isn't even proven to exist yet could have TERMINAL effects down the road after being proven wrong. I'd just like to KNOW we're right before making
irrevocable and possible catastrophic moves to the generations that come after us.
edit on 26-1-2013 by Wrabbit2000 because: (no reason