well thanks for the responses.
For everyone asking for sources, I DID provide a study done on all of the great apes and by and far the ones with larger brains were found to be more
intelligent correlating the larger brain size to body size belief.
It is really all up in the air, BUT if the organizational properties of the brain was the only determining factor, then as I said before, A GOLD FISH
would be smarter than a dolphin....
Size has everything to do with it. I do think there is a relation. I even mentioned Einstein´s brain which was studied. The parts of his brain that
handle mathematical skills, and spacial cognition and spatial perception /motion were much larger than normal. His brain had many anomalies.
please look to my response here on the first and second page
reply to post by zedVSzardoz
reply to post by zedVSzardoz
as far as the rest. PROOF? are you kidding me? From the comfort of my PC I am going to dig up evidence of this theory and then PROVE it?
sorry, you are just asking WAY too much. What i can do is continue to argue my THEORY and mitigate any questions we may have as best as I can.
Some one asked why there is no technological evidence? Have you seen that discover show called something like 100 years without humans?
Basically in a couple hundred years you would be hard pressed to find anything bigger than a soccer ball. Give more time and you would only find
things like statues and other artificial structures we made out of natural materials or REALLY pure metal.
so, you take into account and endless progression of humans living and dying along side the ruins of what ever civilization was left. they would need
building materials and nick-knacks themselves and so eventually only the largest unmovable structures would remain.
Some one mentioned Zechariah Stichin and another said he has been "disproved"
Well, not exactly. I did VERY quickly summarize the lost book of Enki according to Stichin. Whether you believe his version of the translations or
not, HE DID make some astounding and CORRECT translations that show a direct link of the Sumerian /Babylonian origin stories and those of the bible.
HE also was the first to even touch the Sumerian tablets. NO ONE translated them for the general public. Scholars did, but more so out of
Stichin may have said "rocket ship" where you or I would see "chariot" but like I said in my summary, sometimes you just need to take SOME creative
license to tell a story that transcends TOO MANY ages and cultures for us to wrap our head around it and even follow it chronologically.
It is basically what the ancient Sumerians believed and there is a clear link from those stories to the akkadian and the bible. Moses was a citizen of
the Babylonian city of UR. He took his nomadic people who lived VERY DIFFERENTLY than him and taught them everything he learned while living in the
then known civilized world, which included THESE origin stories.
Maybe they didn't say "rocket ship" but they most certainly meant SKY or SPACE:...and they knew of PLANETS....ect.
Their gods were incarnate...and intermingled with them. They also MADE THEM from a primitive beast of the field that kind of looked like them by
infusing it with their essence. "made in Gods image", "made in the image of elohim", (elohim *maybe being plural referring to GODS or a God people,
and not just God as a single God which was a term developed MUCH later among the Semitic people."made with the essence of the gods"
Anyways, I knew it that close minded people would shoot this down, and more so when I try to explain our mythology which speaks to this DIRECTLY in
almost all cultures across the globe. YOU would have to be blind as a bat NOT to see a connection. Even by your own standards of an isolated world
which JUST got its act together and had us idiots climb down from trees a few thousand years ago.....
There is just SOO much supporting evidence to an alternate and much older version of events for human history, that you just can not deny it any
I dont blame academia for not being all knowing and just "knowing" this. BUT I do blame the perpetuation of ignorance out of laziness or spite.....
There MAY be more than what we know to the worlds history. We COULD be missing HUGE parts of the story. We only just started looking really in the
last couple hundred years, and only in the last DECADES have had tools worthy of such a task.
Sooooo.....?, keep an open mind huh? Most of what we know now came form people in Whigs who thought you soul was trying to leave your nose when you
sneezed and would bless you so it would get tucked back in you....or other such nonsense and superstition.....they did good,, but were VERY
limited...lets just see OK?
edit on 22-1-2013 by zedVSzardoz because: (no reason given)