reply to post by JewAgainstZionism
JewAgainstZionism, it is a DELIGHT to read your posts and answers, friend.
But of course, again attacks over attacks, for telling the truth. It’s the old rule of thumb: The deeper the truth, the fiercer the personal
===> There is no need to always present evidence on discussion boards. It is a viable variant to “only” present new information, opinions, trains
of thought and then just leave it to the readers to verify/check what’s presented, or leave it open for future research (as direct proof may often
not be available, see below). That is how the opening post was obviously meant. So no reason to get upset or personally attack the original poster.
(Except of course for those with a cover up agenda, greetings to the zillions of secret society fellows on the web).
Accordingly I feel no urge to criticise “mere” information. If I don’t like it, I leave the thread, probably with a short remark, no problem. If
it sounds interesting, I possibly gained a rewarding starting point for further personal research.
===> Secondly, presenting information AND thorough evidence may take much, much longer. So for original posters with only scarce time there must be an
option to quickly present some core information also without evidence. Otherwise many pieces of great information could not be presented at all.
===> Thirdly it is to be considered that most evidence regarding issues like the OP’s gets hidden, destroyed, removed, locked away by powerful
Governments. So it may not even be theoretically possible to provide hard evidence for certain issues. Now does that mean we may not discuss them.
===> The same goes for issues that cannot YET be scientifically explained or proved. For instance, how the heck are we supposed to provide evidence
for astral level occurrences? Anybody a 4D camera? Or an ouja surf board to take shots from in the astral plane …?
Now for all these reasons the posting of “mere” information is NOTHING to complain about per se. It is one reasonable thread opening variant.
Again, how can someone seriously claim that only Information “with” evidence may be discussed.
2. About content. Sometimes “no evidence” threads may be annoying if presented information was just made up. But that is certainly not the case
with JewAgainstZionism’s threads. I have for years been researching issues he addresses, and must state: As far as I found conclusions for myself,
they EXACTLY add up to JewAgainstZionism’s views.
edit on 23-1-2013 by giugliot because: spelling