Dark web warning

page: 11
43
<< 8  9  10    12  13 >>

log in

join

posted on Jan, 20 2013 @ 10:54 PM
link   
reply to post by TKDRL
 


I mean remote access the nodes.

IDK about that last part. My thoughts on this will not be shared on ATS because it is a public forum. I will put it like this...there are few times I would be convinced to act against my faith...


Allowing them to continue fuels child porn - which causes the exact opposite of the intended effect of having less children abused.

There is a solution to this, but we seem to prefer to legalize killing babies than those who would rape them (yes I brought abortion into this, it fits).




posted on Jan, 20 2013 @ 10:57 PM
link   
reply to post by NarrowGate
 


I guess it might be possible. The nodes are PC's, people volunteer their own PC's to be a node, I used to run an exit node back when I had kickass internet in NY. Until I find unlimited net up here it is impossible to do. To run a node, all you have to do is enable the option, and keep the program running, and connected to the net. The most risky and hard to find is exit nodes, as that is the IP that the websites sees as user IP. To be an exit node, you have to enable that specifically too, most people choose to be a node in the middle.
edit on Sun, 20 Jan 2013 23:00:15 -0600 by TKDRL because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 20 2013 @ 11:04 PM
link   
reply to post by TKDRL
 


But wait...wasn't it funded by the US Navy? What evidence do we have that many of the nodes are NOT run by US govt computers?

Also, is it possible that once into the system of nodes they could..well you get the point?



posted on Jan, 20 2013 @ 11:11 PM
link   
reply to post by NarrowGate
 


Oh, I am certain there are gov run nodes, and not just US nodes either. In order to know what is being sent, you need to be an exit node. But then, you don't know where it came from. Data is encrypted by TOR before you send it, then the middle nodes just send it along, the exit note decrypts and sends to the destination. It then gets a response, encrypts it, and sends it back through the chain to the user.

I am no expert by any stretch though, I know enough to use it in advanced ways. I am not sure how you are able to make "new circuts" in the middle of sending or receiving data, and not interrupt it for example, I just know you can.



posted on Jan, 21 2013 @ 02:48 AM
link   
reply to post by ArMaP
 


you just proved the point,

" TRY IT"


you have to go looking for it. ^^



posted on Jan, 21 2013 @ 03:05 AM
link   
reply to post by votan
 


I understand exactly what you are saying, I was just saying I never thought about it that way personally. Sounds like we are interested in the same subjects, mainly NLP and other covert influence


I would assume the first people that coined the term darknet, were either consciously, or subconsciously trying to repel people from it



posted on Jan, 21 2013 @ 03:07 AM
link   
reply to post by Blueboyinheaven
 


Referring to government agencies as good causes me great concern



posted on Jan, 21 2013 @ 03:17 AM
link   
Would have been way more interesting if it was like marianas web he accessed
lol cus deep web is very easy to connect to . Some onion sites even are accessible through basic surface web browsers like chrome or firefox.
edit on 21-1-2013 by talesone because: wrong reply



posted on Jan, 21 2013 @ 10:27 AM
link   
reply to post by TKDRL
 

What is NLP and other covert influence? Dangit.... I think I might be officially a conspiracy theorist soon. Im going to write a book one day!



posted on Jan, 21 2013 @ 11:35 AM
link   

Originally posted by NarrowGate
reply to post by TKDRL
 


The alphabet boys could not remote-access this? I could see why it might not hold up in court - but surely they can get the evidence needed to know what is going on. From there, all they have to do is wait it out and find an excuse.

I am not saying they should use tactics like this on every little illegal transaction, for this would be of no benefit to the tax payers - but child porn? Catch them by any means necessary.
edit on 20-1-2013 by NarrowGate because: (no reason given)

They aren't worried about the people who view it. They are after the people who are producing and/or distributing it on a mass scale. Do you know how long it would take to arrest every single person who views/downloads child porn? It isn't worth their time or money. They would rather rip the tree out by the root instead of trimming the branches.
edit on 21-1-2013 by Xaphan because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 21 2013 @ 11:37 AM
link   
reply to post by TKDRL
 


Governmental agencies are THEORETICALLY good. They are OSTENSIBLY designed to help the citizens ruled by that government. And I, personally, still do believe that most people in the government BELIEVE that they are working in the citizens' best interests.

It just happens to be that most of them are probably wrong



posted on Jan, 21 2013 @ 12:29 PM
link   

Originally posted by Xaphan

Originally posted by NarrowGate
reply to post by TKDRL
 


The alphabet boys could not remote-access this? I could see why it might not hold up in court - but surely they can get the evidence needed to know what is going on. From there, all they have to do is wait it out and find an excuse.

I am not saying they should use tactics like this on every little illegal transaction, for this would be of no benefit to the tax payers - but child porn? Catch them by any means necessary.
edit on 20-1-2013 by NarrowGate because: (no reason given)

They aren't worried about the people who view it. They are after the people who are producing and/or distributing it on a mass scale. Do you know how long it would take to arrest every single person who views/downloads child porn? It isn't worth their time or money. They would rather rip the tree out by the root instead of trimming the branches.
edit on 21-1-2013 by Xaphan because: (no reason given)


The ones viewing will be the new F* N* producing this S*. And no I have absolutely no idea how long it would take, I just assumed there are not that many doing that stuff. If there are a lot, they need to start paying people to handle it. I know, no profits and all that
demonic influence on society maybe?

edit: It is more profitable to go after dope boys than child rapists - they give them longer sentences in prison for some f*d up reason and they have to pay to "rehabilitate" the child predators unlike the man trying to help his family in a bad situation.

Maybe that has something to do with it? DEA? How about CREA? Child Rape Enforcement Agency. Why do we not have one? I will give you 1 guess as to why. Here is a hint : $
edit on 21-1-2013 by NarrowGate because: (no reason given)



posted on Jan, 21 2013 @ 12:31 PM
link   

Originally posted by Solasis
reply to post by TKDRL
 


Governmental agencies are THEORETICALLY good. They are OSTENSIBLY designed to help the citizens ruled by that government. And I, personally, still do believe that most people in the government BELIEVE that they are working in the citizens' best interests.

It just happens to be that most of them are probably wrong


Corporate influence. They work for them, the 1% and up, not us - the 99%. They are probably not happy about this, much like us.



posted on Jan, 21 2013 @ 03:21 PM
link   

Originally posted by ~widowmaker~
you have to go looking for it. ^^

Yes, but T, O and R are used for other things, that's what I was trying to say.

For example, if you are looking for Thor and write Tor, what do you find?

It does appear on a Google search.



posted on Jan, 21 2013 @ 05:52 PM
link   
interesting



posted on Jan, 21 2013 @ 05:58 PM
link   
"And here's the kicker", Morgan said. "They totally wouldn't take my Dad's credit card, so I busted them, lolz".
I have long understood that the Internet is just a network for sharing data and communicating, and that there are probably "shells" or layers I'm not even aware of, so this does not surprise me.



posted on Jan, 21 2013 @ 06:04 PM
link   
reply to post by TKDRL
 


I ran a TOR relay for a few years until technical issues forced me to disable it. I have long suspected people use these for really awful things like kiddie porn. I would like to run it again as a public service, but I can't do it in good conscience of I know these things are flowing (encrypted) on my system. Of course if you run a TOR relay it's not up to you to judge what's in the data stream, so I'll have to leave it off.



posted on Jan, 21 2013 @ 06:18 PM
link   
reply to post by WhamBamTYM
 


That's what also keeps me from doing it, if I have to part of a bad thing to bad part of a good thing then I guess it's better to leave things as they are.



posted on Jan, 21 2013 @ 06:47 PM
link   
reply to post by ArMaP
 


I agree. Unless you are using it to bypass tyrants, I don't see any use.



posted on Jan, 21 2013 @ 07:47 PM
link   
tor is not secure anyway,

the end nodes can monitor traffic, wouldn't be surprised if some of the exit nodes are run by three letter agencies.

It's also dirt slow.

As for 'dark web', i say welcome to planet earth. Children are exploited in many ways, not just online.





new topics
 
43
<< 8  9  10    12  13 >>

log in

join