I Killed Bigfoot -- A Conversation with Justin Smeja (video & audio)

reply to post by six67seven


Nonsense? Your OP was very descriptive. I thought you did an excellent job explaining what is contained in the interview. I have my point of view on someone even attempting to kill this Being, and I think it's very important to leave these Beings alone, if they exist.

reply to post by six67seven


I already knew that he gathered apparent evidence after returning to the scene from what I read in your opening post.

Why are you getting so defensive?

All I asked is why he didnt take evidence originally, makes no sense.

Cheers

Originally posted by redbarron626
I completely disagree with this guy but a star for you for actually taking the time to make a Good Thread with descriptions, opinions and vids! It seems like very few members here understand what a good thread is supposed to look like.

NEW USERS,

THIS is how a thread should be done!

OP, I want to believe!

Edit: I flagged this for future use!

edit on 4-1-2013 by redbarron626 because: to wave a banner

you are my new hero, and you get a star for reminding the masses what this forum is for, kudos

OP you also get kudos for laying out a well presented thread, others are just haters, we'll ignore them for now

Originally posted by FoxMulder91
reply to post by six67seven

 

I already knew that he gathered apparent evidence after returning to the scene from what I read in your opening post.

Why are you getting so defensive?

All I asked is why he didnt take evidence originally, makes no sense.

Cheers

Seems as though I should be less descriptive in my OP
well, I still have time to edit

reply to post by six67seven


haha, I really liked your OP, its provided lots of information, so thank you for that.

At the moment im just to sidetracked to watch a long video/interview.

Cheers

Originally posted by six67seven

Originally posted by FoxMulder91
reply to post by six67seven

 

I already knew that he gathered apparent evidence after returning to the scene from what I read in your opening post.
Why are you getting so defensive?
All I asked is why he didnt take evidence originally, makes no sense.
Cheers

Seems as though I should be less descriptive in my OP

well, I still have time to edit

So, let me get this straight.....because someone has pointed out an obvious flaw to your story....you are going to change it for your own credibility.

Capital L for you.

Originally posted by rickymouse
Maybe he did take both bigfoots. Just think how much they could be sold for to a rich collector of animals. I would be interested to see the polygraph test of him denying he took them. Wouldn't you take them and sell them for a huge fortune?

That's not entirely unbelievable, really. I'd ask the same question, even go as far as ask him his motivation for shooting it/them.

Originally posted by FoxMulder91
reply to post by six67seven

 

haha, I really liked your OP, its provided lots of information, so thank you for that.

At the moment im just to sidetracked to watch a long video/interview.

Cheers

edit on 4-1-2013 by FoxMulder91 because: (no reason given)

I knew the haters would arrive and thought I should be objective in describing Justin's story. Now I know better... just post the video with a one-liner.

I hope you get to come back to listen to at least the first video.

reply to post by six67seven


someone boasting about murdering a sentient creature is not acceptable. Be it his imagination or not. That Justing is an evil man at worst a sociopath at best,

Originally posted by OccamAssassin

Originally posted by six67seven

Originally posted by FoxMulder91
reply to post by six67seven

 

I already knew that he gathered apparent evidence after returning to the scene from what I read in your opening post.
Why are you getting so defensive?
All I asked is why he didnt take evidence originally, makes no sense.
Cheers

Seems as though I should be less descriptive in my OP

well, I still have time to edit

So, let me get this straight.....because someone has pointed out an obvious flaw to your story....you are going to change it for your own credibility.

Capital L for you.

It's not my story pal.

and the flaw is an ingorant and WRONG assumption by the poster.

reply to post by six67seven


I promise to watch it if you answer my question for me.


Why didnt he take the body/evidence originally?

Cheers

Originally posted by HelenConway
reply to post by six67seven

 

someone boasting about murdering a sentient creature is not acceptable. Be it his imagination or not. That Justing is an evil man at worst a sociopath at best,

He's not boasting... it occurred on October 8, 2010... if he was boasting why wait almost 2 years (his first interview was July 2012 as far as I know)

And he shows remorse in the first video. But ignorance is the theme tonight, so stick around you fit right in

reply to post by six67seven


How is the flaw ignorant and wrong?

Did he take any evidence originally?

No.

Cheers

Originally posted by FoxMulder91
reply to post by six67seven

 

I promise to watch it if you answer my question for me.


Why didnt he take the body/evidence originally?

Cheers

Well I cant say for certain for obvious reasons but he stated that it was like he was "in a nightmare" during the whole ordeal. And his buddy told him over and over not to shoot. He said his frame of mind was that it was unnatural and it was "a monster"

The same thing happens at crime scenes, people panic... and whos not to say it wasn't a crime scene. Crazy stuff

Interesting pissing match going on here. The bottom line is this: Any idiot can claim to have killed a bigfoot. I claimed it on page one. Why would you do as much when you have no proof? Why?

Shoot, I killed three aliens last week but they got away.

Hey guys, I totally shot a bigfoot, two actually; two of the most elusive and widely discussed crypto in existence and then I packed up and went home without anything to verify my story.


I also have a bridge in New York I'd like to sell you and a rich Nigerian Prince who wants to cut a deal with you.

Originally posted by FoxMulder91
reply to post by six67seven

 

How is the flaw ignorant and wrong?

Did he take any evidence originally?

No.

Cheers

he apparently had blood on his boots from the juvenile... does that count?

Thanks, OP, for these links. I've followed this story quite a bit over on Bigfoot Evidence, but I'd not heard this interview yet. I'll listen tonight when my 5 year old finally sleeps.

I want to say I had the EXACT same question...how the hell does he NOT know anything about Bigfoot being an outdoorsman in California??

Thanks!

The samples have been sent to the lab(s) but results take time. Like I said, the story has just begun.
I'd like to hear from his friend that was with him.

This man is full of it!

Why?

He says that if someone did find the body, as rumor had suggested, his first concern was "a financial cut".

That killed his credibility for me and he admitted his motive.

Just my opinion.

ETA: He is working with Bigfoot video producers......just another hit against him.