Quake Watch 2013

page: 51
114
<< 48  49  50    52  53  54 >>

log in

join

posted on Mar, 3 2013 @ 12:48 AM
link   
Nikko Nat Park Honshu still going off after that 6.2 on 25/02/2013, mostly micros or very minor size now




posted on Mar, 3 2013 @ 08:04 AM
link   
Geophysical report of this last week now done except volcanoes - run out of time and have to go out.

New section this week onwards tracking Solar Flux Units and the AP Index, nTeslas and other stuff - some still to be added.

ETA: Looks like I forgot to change my signature to reflect the report for the week ending 22 Feb so apologies for that and here is a link to it

edit on 3/3/2013 by PuterMan because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 3 2013 @ 05:32 PM
link   
earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/eqarchives/fm/neic_c000fff5_fmt.php

USGS Body-Wave Moment Tensor Solution
YUNNAN, CHINA

13/03/03 05:41:20.10

Epicenter: 25.968 99.815
MW 5.2

USGS MOMENT TENSOR SOLUTION
Depth 8 No. of sta: 19


geofon.gfz-potsdam.de/data/alerts/2013/gfz2013ehwy/mt.txt

GFZ Event gfz2013ehwy
13/03/03 05:41:19.33
Yunnan, China
Epicenter: 25.94 99.67
MW 5.4

GFZ MOMENT TENSOR SOLUTION
Depth 15 No. of sta: 54


30 injured in southwest China quake
English.news.cn 2013-03-04 00:18:00

news.xinhuanet.com/english/china/2013-03/04/c_132205114.htm



KUNMING, March 3 (Xinhua) -- Thirty people have been confirmed injured, including three seriously, after a 5.5-magnitude earthquake hit southwest China's Yunnan Province on Sunday afternoon.

Some 12,000 people have also been evacuated, said the provincial Civil Affairs Department.

The quake hit Eryuan County, Dali Bai Autonomous Prefecture at 1:41 p.m.. The epicenter was in Xishan Township with a depth of 9 km.

Latest statistics showed 92,000 residents were affected by the quake, while 83,434 houses were damaged and 1,781 others collapsed. Infrastructure including schools, transportation and communications systems, water and power lines was damaged to various degrees.

The Yunnan provincial government initiated a grade-III emergency response earlier and later upgraded it to grade-II.

The Civil Affairs Department said 3,000 tents, 7,000 cotton quilts and 7,000 coats were being sent to the quake-hit area.

A quake relief team consisting of more than 400 policemen, fire fighters and soldiers has been dispatched.

Some 34 aftershocks have been recorded after the quake.

In history, 19 earthquakes of magnitude 5 or above occurred within a 50-km radius of the epicenter.
Editor: yan



posted on Mar, 4 2013 @ 11:41 AM
link   
The newest Oklahoma earthquake is a frackquake.
It is in a new area to the south, much removed from the other "swarm zone" near Oklahoma City.
The area to the south of the epicenter is littered with frack pads and it looks like there's a refinery/natural gas storage facility in the neighbourhood as well.

I wonder if they are storing the Liquid Natural Gas LNG underground in some sort of salt dome like they had in Lousiana which produced that monster sinkhole. If so, they are doing so by a resovoir and lake. Brilliant. maybe

frack 'em




Why can't I learn not to take a second look. There's a nice wild refuge near those gas fields. I'm sure the water is fine and there's no need to worry about them polluting the water. In Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, there's a habour where there's a dead zone. As well, there's one in the Gulf of Mexico. And so on...


















edit on 4-3-2013 by ericblair4891 because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 4 2013 @ 01:12 PM
link   
I think we will see some new M5.0+ ones withing 24 hours...



posted on Mar, 4 2013 @ 03:32 PM
link   


whatever it is, (it's siesmic on one sort or another because it shows on multiple stations- my guess hydrothermal since it appears to be under the lake) it seems to be continuing as i watch gee
i had been watching due to tiny quakes near Madison Plateau
edit on 4-3-2013 by ericblair4891 because: (no reason given)
edit on 4-3-2013 by ericblair4891 because: (no reason given)


seems to have quieted now.
edit on 4-3-2013 by ericblair4891 because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 5 2013 @ 05:34 AM
link   
reply to post by ericblair4891
 


Those are 3 quakes West-North/West from Lake Yellow Stone.

earthquake.usgs.gov...

earthquake.usgs.gov...

earthquake.usgs.gov...



posted on Mar, 5 2013 @ 12:15 PM
link   

Originally posted by wujotvowujotvowujotvo
news.xinhuanet.com/english/china/2013-03/04/c_132205114.htm
KUNMING, March 3 (Xinhua) -- Thirty people have been confirmed injured, including three seriously
83,434 houses were damaged and 1,781 others collapsed.

In history, 19 earthquakes of magnitude 5 or above occurred within a 50-km radius of the epicenter.
Editor: yan


8-15km, shallow, quite a strong quake given the damage.
We do tend to get too casual about those mid to high 5's when so many of them are offshore and don't cause any damage.
also details from CENC
1970-2012 mag5+ map


Some 34 aftershocks have been recorded after the quake.

I hate it when the MSM say that, but don't link to the source, so where is the data?
It takes a bit of finding (actually bothering to look for it)
China Earthquake Networks earthquake catalog (1 week) (translated to English) [color=lime]* muzzy's find of the week
They do get quite a few quakes, 774 (mostly micro [less than mag2] or very-minor [mag2-3]on this interactive map I created from that data (centered on Eryuan County, Dali Bai Autonomous Prefecture, Yunnan, the epicenter in question) (zoom out for the whole country)
goo.gl...
edit on 5-3-2013 by muzzy because: I feel a new page on Earthquake Archives coming on
edit on 5-3-2013 by muzzy because: changed the GMaps link, had UTC when it was local time, and had a bracket wrong in the html so the time didn't show on the popup tag text anyway


found the search page (one of them) here
starts on 2009-01-02 @ 10:43:33.4, mag 0.1+

there are a couple of other catalog's linked on that page, one has mag 3+ data from January 1, 1970 to 2012, a total of 147,633 events
edit on 5-3-2013 by muzzy because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 5 2013 @ 03:02 PM
link   
www.okgeosurvey1.gov...

This the site for Oklahoma. All the recent activity has broke there network. Or, are they hiding something. I've tried to get good graphs and find good stations, but even Puterman gave up. So, just assume the activity is constant. Never ending. Soon to growing again as they reconfigure the sub-surface which took eons to form. I'm sure their tinkering with it will come to much good for all. mutter mutter rabble rabble


Well, I might not be able to look at Oklahoma, but I can look at Yellowstone.

0.9 2013/03/05 00:15:02 44.091N 110.449W 4.3 58 km (36 mi) NE of Alta, WY
2.2 2013/03/04 14:01:24 44.477N 110.570W 2.9 47 km (29 mi) ESE of West Yellowstone, MT
2.6 2013/03/04 13:57:42 44.472N 110.564W 3.8 48 km (30 mi) ESE of West Yellowstone, MT
1.4 2013/03/04 13:57:37 44.472N 110.562W 4.8 48 km (30 mi) ESE of West Yellowstone, MT
1.5 2013/03/04 13:57:14 44.469N 110.572W 5.1 47 km (29 mi) ESE of West Yellowstone, MT
0.2 2013/03/04 13:56:49 44.477N 110.571W 6.9 47 km (29 mi) ESE of West Yellowstone, MT
1.8 2013/03/04 13:49:18 44.426N 110.444W 2.8 59 km (36 mi) ESE of West Yellowstone, MT
1.4 2013/03/04 13:49:10 44.479N 110.576W 2.4 47 km (29 mi) ESE of West Yellowstone, MT
0.7 2013/03/04 12:44:51 44.286N 110.463W 9.9 66 km (41 mi) SE of West Yellowstone, MT
0.3 2013/03/04 12:02:37 44.727N 111.022W 1.3 10 km ( 6 mi) NE of West Yellowstone, MT
1.0 2013/03/04 10:01:47 44.719N 111.035W 7.2 8 km ( 5 mi) NE of West Yellowstone, MT
0.8 2013/03/04 08:58:46 44.719N 111.024W 7.3 9 km ( 6 mi) NE of West Yellowstone, MT
0.9 2013/03/04 08:27:46 44.714N 111.024W 7.3 9 km ( 5 mi) NE of West Yellowstone, MT
0.6 2013/03/03 19:23:18 44.707N 111.032W 7.0 8 km ( 5 mi) NE of West Yellowstone, MT
0.8 2013/03/03 01:35:07 44.678N 110.454W 3.2 45 km (28 mi) SSE of Gardiner, MT
1.3 2013/03/02 05:35:35 44.448N 110.614W 5.2 46 km (28 mi) ESE of West Yellowstone, MT
1.1 2013/03/02 03:31:58 44.519N 110.914W 5.9 22 km (14 mi) SE of West Yellowstone, MT
0.9 2013/03/01 23:51:59 44.522N 110.918W 3.0 22 km (13 mi) SE of West Yellowstone, MT
1.1 2013/03/01 23:50:56 44.521N 110.917W 5.6 22 km (13 mi) SE of West Yellowstone, MT
0.6 2013/03/01 11:49:21 44.771N 110.962W 7.3 17 km (10 mi) NE of West Yellowstone, MT
0.7 2013/03/01 06:16:47 44.236N 110.847W 3.7 40 km (25 mi) ENE of Warm River, ID
1.4 2013/03/01 00:15:51 44.243N 110.788W 4.8 45 km (28 mi) ENE of Warm River, ID
1.5 2013/03/01 00:15:50 44.228N 110.770W 3.8 45 km (28 mi) ENE of Warm River, ID
1.2 2013/02/27 09:50:18 44.724N 111.160W 12.3 8 km ( 5 mi) NNW of West Yellowstone, MT
0.9 2013/02/26 21:24:44 44.612N 111.141W 8.4 6 km ( 4 mi) SSW of West Yellowstone, MT


my guess is still hydro-thermal
edit on 5-3-2013 by ericblair4891 because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 6 2013 @ 04:47 AM
link   
Hmm what about this M5.0+ ones near Papua New Guinea? How do you guys think it will develop? Somehow similar to Santa Cruz or not? I mean before the big one

edit on 6-3-2013 by aLLeKs because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 6 2013 @ 06:13 AM
link   
It won't be long before another big quake hits. Who knows where this time. Their growing in frequency and in strength. I know where I live they're not real common, but there has been an increase in recent weeks.



posted on Mar, 6 2013 @ 06:53 AM
link   
Quake victims slam "harlem" shake.



Bad taste?



posted on Mar, 6 2013 @ 07:30 AM
link   
So.... Prince Edward Islands seems to be doing a little swarm dance.


MAP 4.3 2013/03/06 07:30:48 -43.309 40.072 10.0 PRINCE EDWARD ISLANDS REGION
MAP 5.0 2013/03/06 12:28:15 -43.381 39.690 10.0 PRINCE EDWARD ISLANDS REGION
MAP 4.9 2013/03/06 12:24:33 -43.387 39.564 10.0 PRINCE EDWARD ISLANDS REGION
MAP 5.2 2013/03/06 10:30:54 -43.483 39.961 9.4 PRINCE EDWARD ISLANDS REGION
MAP 4.6 2013/03/06 08:57:44 -43.361 40.187 10.0 PRINCE EDWARD ISLANDS REGION
MAP 4.5 2013/03/06 08:19:19 -43.407 39.979 14.8 PRINCE EDWARD ISLANDS REGION


earthquake.usgs.gov...



posted on Mar, 6 2013 @ 10:37 AM
link   
like I posted before, we will start seeing a bit more activity arround the world



posted on Mar, 6 2013 @ 12:44 PM
link   
NZ Update, 3 hot spots ( data from last 7 days )
a band across Central North Island
East to West;
North Madden Bank, South of Cape Kidnappers/ Ocean Beach
Elsthorpe/Waipukurau
South Taranaki Bight SW of Wanganui
interactive map
nothing major, bit of subduction going on.



posted on Mar, 6 2013 @ 12:47 PM
link   
reply to post by MamaJ
 


LDEO has more;

2013 3 6 12 28 16.0 -43.25 39.75 33.0 5.2 PRINCE EDWARD ISLANDS REGION
2013 3 6 12 24 24.0 -43.25 39.75 33.0 5.1 PRINCE EDWARD ISLANDS REGION
2013 3 6 10 30 48.0 -43.25 40.25 33.0 5.6 PRINCE EDWARD ISLANDS REGION
2013 3 6 8 57 44.0 -43.25 40.25 33.0 5.3 PRINCE EDWARD ISLANDS REGION
2013 3 6 8 47 4.0 -43.25 40.25 33.0 5.3 PRINCE EDWARD ISLANDS REGION
2013 3 6 8 19 12.0 -43.25 40.25 33.0 [color=9E7BFF]4.9 PRINCE EDWARD ISLANDS REGION
2013 3 6 7 56 32.0 -43.25 40.25 33.0 5.1 PRINCE EDWARD ISLANDS REGION
2013 3 6 7 30 40.0 -43.25 40.25 33.0 5.0 PRINCE EDWARD ISLANDS REGION
2013 3 6 4 47 44.0 -43.25 40.25 33.0 5.2 PRINCE EDWARD ISLANDS REGION

www.ldeo.columbia.edu...
edit on 6-3-2013 by muzzy because: add some colour, Note* these mags are Ms



posted on Mar, 6 2013 @ 12:58 PM
link   
reply to post by sc1981
 

Are you sure about that?
If you take away aftershocks (particularily Santa Cruz) I'd say activity is down for 2013 so far, or "normal"



posted on Mar, 6 2013 @ 01:51 PM
link   
reply to post by aLLeKs
 


I must have missed your post before. Why do you suppose more activity will come into play across the world???



posted on Mar, 6 2013 @ 02:31 PM
link   
I'm always paranoid. In the words of the Great Johnny Fever, "When everybody is out to get you, paranoia is just good thinking."

Could some one check the Okie site to see if it works. Or, is it just me?

www.okgeosurvey1.gov...

There's been another sizeable one I believe. Although, it's not listed yet. I'll say 3m. Why not.

It's hard to catch all them though. The smaller ones aren't always picked up by public stations.



Hehehehehe. They just listed it when I checked back.
earthquake.usgs.gov...

Frackquake. Google earth shows the gasboys figerprints all over the epicenter.
Natural!?
My frackin ass.

There seems to be another smaller on following along.
May not get listed due to it's size. It's so damned hard to tell.

edit on 6-3-2013 by ericblair4891 because: (no reason given)
edit on 6-3-2013 by ericblair4891 because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 6 2013 @ 04:30 PM
link   

Originally posted by MamaJ
reply to post by aLLeKs
 


I must have missed your post before. Why do you suppose more activity will come into play across the world???

no it was just pretty quiet for 1 or 2 days, so I was not suprised to see so many (or normal activity level now) of M5.0+ quakes. I just said we will start seeing a bit more.

It will slow down again, it is just a regular up and down somehow.





new topics
top topics
 
114
<< 48  49  50    52  53  54 >>

log in

join