It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Itisnowagain
reply to post by D1ss1dent
If the nothingness is found life becomes lighter. Everyone longs for the nothingness. It is what the seeker seeks. It wants to rest in peace. Being longs to be.
Originally posted by 1nf1del
Originally posted by Itisnowagain
reply to post by D1ss1dent
If the nothingness is found life becomes lighter. Everyone longs for the nothingness. It is what the seeker seeks. It wants to rest in peace. Being longs to be.
There is no :"nothingness", EVERYTHING is made of the same energy, if energy takes up every little gap where do you expect to find "nothingness"?
Originally posted by Itisnowagain
Originally posted by 1nf1del
Originally posted by Itisnowagain
reply to post by D1ss1dent
If the nothingness is found life becomes lighter. Everyone longs for the nothingness. It is what the seeker seeks. It wants to rest in peace. Being longs to be.
There is no :"nothingness", EVERYTHING is made of the same energy, if energy takes up every little gap where do you expect to find "nothingness"?
But that energy is not a thing. It is formless until it is formed. Realizing the unformed energy (prior to all things) is what is important. Return to the source.edit on 22-12-2012 by Itisnowagain because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by D1ss1dent
Conclusively, what could be said is that:
1) Fundamentally, reality has two inseparable aspects: one static and the other, dynamic (purusha & prakriti).
2) The dynamic aspect is a reflection of the static one.
3) Everyone is the zero-point.
4) The zero-point is infinite and has the ability to create an infinite amount of infinities.
5) The static spect of reality is not nothing (a self-evidence, if you look around yourself).
7) "That" can be named and "That" can also not be named.
6) "The zero-point can be known" and "the zero point cannot be known" are two valid statements.
8) There's only two things that exist: knowledge and ignorance.
Originally posted by AthlonSavage
reply to post by Itisnowagain
S1; AB - 2
S2: ABA - 3
S3: ABAAB - 5
S4: ABAABABA - 8
S5: ABAABABAABAAB -13
S6: ABAABABAABAABABAABABA - 21
S7: ABAABABAABAABABAABABAABAABABAABAAB - 34
S8: ABAABABAABAABABAABABAABAABABAABAABABAABABAABAABABAABABA - 55
S9: ABAABABAABAABABAABABAABAABABAABAABABAABABAABAABABAABABAABA
ABABAABAABABAABABAABAABABAABAAB -89
Sx: ABAABABAABAABABAABABAABAABABAABAABABAABABAABAABABAABABAABAABA
BAABAABABAABABAABAABABAABAABABAABABAABAABABAABABAABAABABAABAABABA
ABABAABAABABAABABA
... 144
Sx11:
ABAABABAABAABABAABABAABAABABAABAABABAABABAABAABABAABABAABAABA
BAABAABABAABABAABAABABAABAABABAABABAABAABABAABABAABAABABAABAABABA
ABABAABAABABAABABA
ABAABABAABAABABAABABAABAABABAABAABABAABABAABAABABAABABAABA
ABABAABAABABAABABAABAABABAABAAB - 233
Originally posted by AthlonSavage
reply to post by 1nf1del
The key is this simple. Lets look at first three sequences
S1; AB - 2
S2: ABA - 3
S3: ABAAB - 5
The number at the end of each sequence is there to tell how many letters in sequence,
e.g. S1 AB has 2 letters.
How do we generate sequencce S3 from only knowing S1 and S2?
S1; AB - 2
S2: ABA - 3
Quite easy actually
The sum of 2 + 3 = 5. Therefore we know know S3 will be a sequence made of 5 letters.
S3 will have 5 letters
and what are the letters the S3 sequence is built from. Its built from previous TWO sequences.
Its a descending order summation of previous two sequnces therefore S3 = S2 + S1. (not S1 + S2) but
S2 + S1 = ABA + AB and Therefore S3 = ABAAB
The S4 = S3 + S2 etc
edit on 25-12-2012 by AthlonSavage because: (no reason given)
Finding the zero point and living life from there is what everyone is looking for.
Originally posted by D1ss1dent
reply to post by Itisnowagain
Finding the zero point and living life from there is what everyone is looking for.
Personally, I know many people who fear silence . They think that they'll cease to exist when, in fact, it's the Exact opposite...
edit on 25-12-2012 by D1ss1dent because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Itisnowagain
There is form but no thing 's'.
The form is formed from formlessness.
When the formlessness (nothing) is found, it is obvious that there is only the one form. The one form is formed out of nothing.
Originally posted by jiggerj
Originally posted by Itisnowagain
There is form but no thing 's'.
The form is formed from formlessness.
When the formlessness (nothing) is found, it is obvious that there is only the one form. The one form is formed out of nothing.
If something is formed from the nothingness, then it can be returned to the nothingness.
Originally posted by jiggerj
Originally posted by Itisnowagain
There is form but no thing 's'.
The form is formed from formlessness.
When the formlessness (nothing) is found, it is obvious that there is only the one form. The one form is formed out of nothing.
If something is formed from the nothingness, then it can be returned to the nothingness.