It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by NorEaster
Originally posted by JimTSpock
reply to post by NorEaster
OK now that one really explains a lot. I suspected as much. So when is this great revelation happening again?
That's cool bro radical and I'm all for it.edit on 19-12-2012 by JimTSpock because: add
It's happening right now. Right here. Like I said, this is a wake-up call. This will take years, but it's already begun.
sarcasm
sar·casm [sahr-kaz-uh m]
noun
1. harsh or bitter derision or irony.
2. a sharply ironical taunt; sneering or cutting remark: a review full of sarcasms.
this is a discussion about what's real and physically tangible.
but in the 2nd part of this video I really think that I soundly debunk the concept of Infinity - and thereby (throiugh direct logical inference) debunk all infinite stuff like the always existent God, the Universal Consciousness, infinite amounts of energy that cannot be created nor destroyed, omnipotence, omniscience, omnipresence, infinite space/time/multi-universes, and whatever else is described as being infinite in nature.
Originally posted by Chamberf=6
i]reply to post by NorEaster
this is a discussion about what's real and physically tangible.
As your only focusing your concept of infinity on physical matter/reality...
We all know that everything dies mountains rise or fall, etc.
So is your real point "everything dies in one way or another"?
Who doesn't know that?
The thing is, in your OP you didn't focus on just the physical.
you said:
but in the 2nd part of this video I really think that I soundly debunk the concept of Infinity - and thereby (throiugh direct logical inference) debunk all infinite stuff like the always existent God, the Universal Consciousness, infinite amounts of energy that cannot be created nor destroyed, omnipotence, omniscience, omnipresence, infinite space/time/multi-universes, and whatever else is described as being infinite in nature.
Why the difference as the thread went on?edit on 12/19/2012 by Chamberf=6 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by adjensen
Originally posted by NorEaster
Originally posted by JimTSpock
reply to post by NorEaster
OK now that one really explains a lot. I suspected as much. So when is this great revelation happening again?
That's cool bro radical and I'm all for it.edit on 19-12-2012 by JimTSpock because: add
It's happening right now. Right here. Like I said, this is a wake-up call. This will take years, but it's already begun.
Methinks you're in need of another definition:
sarcasm
sar·casm [sahr-kaz-uh m]
noun
1. harsh or bitter derision or irony.
2. a sharply ironical taunt; sneering or cutting remark: a review full of sarcasms.
Originally posted by Kashai
An interesting issue in respect to the paranormal is that scientist have never really invested time in investigating the source of information related to paranormal experiences.
I mean honestly if one wants to claim something is not real why not investigate its origins???
Originally posted by Kashai
reply to post by adjensen
Actually I testified with respect to a certain matter, the effect was a court record that documented events in the future, as a result of my testimony. This is one of the reasons why I do not take the standard model seriously.
I get involved in things that are complicated...
I was raised to understand indigenous ways.
Any thoughts?
Originally posted by Kashai
Having been raised in part by indigenous people I can tell you that in fact you are wrong and based upon personal experience there is every reason to conclude that infinity can be personally experienced. While you are of course entitled to your opinion all things considered I am of the opinion that you really have no idea as to what you are talking about.
Originally posted by spy66
reply to post by NorEaster
I know what your getting at. I know that on a zoomed in scale reality looks totally different.
And there is no doubt that it will change.
But we humans need the a specific environment to survive in. We need the physical environment to be at a specific frequency to be able to receive the reality surrounding us. We are formed to register reality at a specific specter. And we are formed to be able to live in a specific environment.
A day will come when the environment surroundings us will change in such a state that we have no purpose in it.
edit on 27.06.08 by spy66 because: (no reason given)edit on 27.06.08 by spy66 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by BlueMule
I think your 8 minutes is up...
Anything can be personally experienced. Experiencing something is not the same as actually encountering something. Besides, how can anyone who is finite - which is what we each are - experience infinity? You may be working with a much different definition of the word than I am. I certainly am not referring to anything that someone can experience. Just like you can't experience size. Not the comparative quality that is size. We're definitely not referring to the same thing.
Many view the NDE as the precursor to an afterlife experience, claiming that the NDE cannot be adequately explained by physiological or psychological causes, and that the phenomenon demonstrates that human consciousness can function independently of brain activity.[81] Many NDE-accounts seem to include elements which, according to several theorists, can only be explained by an out-of-body consciousness. Michael Sabom reports a woman who underwent surgery for an aneurysm, and who reported an out-of-body experience that she claimed continued through a brief period of the absence of any EEG activity. [82][82] In another account, from a prospective Dutch NDE study,[17] a nurse removed the dentures of an unconscious heart attack victim, and was identified by him as the one who removed them, although patient was in a coma and undergoing cardio-pulmonary resuscitation at the time.