Originally posted by GoodOlDave
Originally posted by Pilot
reply to post by AfterInfinity
what a strange little man the guy in the wife-beater is...
He didn't create the video to show off his fashion sense. He created the video to make a point, and he definitely made it.
and what "point" is that??? to cause more confusion for the truth?
he did NOT alter the 2.3 second interval of collapse in which the rate of fall was "Indistinguishable from FREE-FALL". If you don't know the
significance of FREE-FALL, I shall enlighten you, it means that NONE of the gravitational potential energy was available to destroy the supporting
structures, since it was ALL converted to MOTION!.
he didn't alter the FACT we see NO fire to do ALL the work..
SO, using BASIC FACTS, common knowledge, and 'good-old' Shyam Sunders quote from the WTC7 Technical Briefing, "free fall acceleration can ONLY
occur when there is NO STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS BELOW IT"
where did ALL the vertical support go within 1.75 SECONDS for the global unified descent that occurs starting when the kink forms, to 4.0 seconds of
the collapse, EQUAL to G?
some quotes from the OFFICIAL INVESTIGATION to help ya...
NCSTAR1-3 7.7.2 "because no steel was recovered from WTC7,it is not possable to make any statements about it's quality"
[NCSTAR1A-3.2]"It is likely that much of the burning took place beyond the views of the windows"
"The fires were fed by ordinary office combustibles"
-[NCSTAR 1A 3.6] "This free fall drop continues for approximately 8 stories, the distance traveled between t=1.75s and t=4.0s...constant, downward
acceleration during this time interval. This acceleration was 9.8m/s^2, equivalent to the acceleration of gravity."
[NICSTAR 1A 4.3.4] Global Collapse..."The entire building above the buckled column region moved downward in a single unit, as observed, completeing
the global collapse"
"Other than initiating the fires in WTC 7, the damage from the debris from WTC 1 had little effect on initiating the collapse of WTC 7."
so Dave, it seems we have a 47 story global collapse, with NO EVIDENCE the fires present did anything.
oh yes, didn't someone officially claim NO explosives or accelerants were used to assist, years after a SCIENTIFIC investigation that did not
"NIST did not test for the residue from explosives or accelerants" wtc. nist. gov/pubs/factsheets/faqs_8_2006. htm
so how does one SCIENTIFICALLY support their claim?
they don't.....do they
[NCSTAR1A 4.3.4] Basing the decision of "No explosives or accelerants were used" on videos that were recorded at the time of collapse.
less than 30 seconds of collapse, scientifically proves NONE were used the entire day....and that is all they have....
no wonder all you ....'people', [I was told I have to be nice to you], focus on 'DISTRACTIONS', case you have NO support for the fantasy claims
you push as truth.
NO one has to prove CD, YOU MUST prove FIRE Alone!
and since there already is an IN-PLACE official claim stemming from a scientific investigation that "NO explosives or accelerants were used to
assist", that means YOU supply the EVIDENCE that NONE were there.....not anyone else to prove different.