posted on Dec, 3 2012 @ 02:24 PM
I've spent a lot of mental time on the the question of 'why' underground bases also.
As a protection from a LOT of possible disaster scenarios, it doesn't work. Flooding, for one. Bad weather, only in the short term, sooner or later
you have to come up to the surface, look around and deal with whatever the conditions are. Any possible radiological protections also seems fruitless
except for buying you a bit of time. DUMBs also offer little if any protection from any kind of biological warfare, if anything the living conditions
would exacerbate an outbreak.
But can someone tell me if electronic gear sufficiently underground would be wholly protected from a CME or EMP, because that's what's looking to me
to be the most likely event, whether man-made or natural. And is the self-protection both personal and COG from an EMP and a CME essentially the same
If I were the PTB and I wanted to enact a controlled population draw-down a la Georgia Guidestones, I'd EMP a given locale and wait for a year while
the population naturally died off by 90%. If I was any country other than the U.S., I'd EMP that continent and get rid of the most dangerous and
brain-addled people on the planet along with close to half a billion resource-gobblers as a matter of global self-preservation. And I'm sure there's
at least half a dozen countries on the globe who have had the same thought.
And yeah, I live in the U.S.; I moved several years ago to a rural area thinking the S was going to HTF anytime, now the thought processes I'm seeing
every day just astonish me. People here are delusional. Clinging to their 'guns and bibles' doesn't begin to describe it, and there's little
effort given to dealing with anything approaching reality here. I'm ready to leave; 'where' is the problem.