It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by fettman89
Nothing can truly be for certain in this day and age, it seems like there a quiet storm brewing ready to cut loose, but who knows what this may in its self bring, new liberation, the chance to place blame on those who deserve it, even if the worst happens and the one world government starts inching into play, the free people of the world will be more spiritually and emotionally collective to rise against the threat, spiritual conciousness on a global scale, could you believe it? The free people fighting for what they know is right.
Originally posted by NoJoker13
reply to post by DarknStormy
An although I agree much of the government agenda is about making money. Global Warming is in fact real, regardless of whether or not our government is trying to profit off of it. They try to profit off of everything, don't they? Does it mean it's false? No it means their greedy, I could name about 300 fictional taxes if you'd like me to but I'll just name one 'income' tax. Read my above post there is more then enough information to prove that this is the highest warming cycle in this short of time in the past 650,000 years, in reference and if that other guy is 'correct' it should have been in the last 110,000 since that's when the last ice age started.
Originally posted by TRUELIES11
I will not read or write on this thread again.
edit on 1-12-2012 by TRUELIES11 because: (no reason given)
I don't doubt the warming since 1979, at all...I do doubt pre-1979 data, though... I just prefer to use the most accurate data, and most legitimate physical analysis.
You mention "research"...what you say about "research" is not accurate...I was one of the scientists you cite, actually doing such "research"..I was a reviewer of the AR4 IPCC report..I've attended hundreds of conferences, and reviewed dozens of papers..even from the scientists you've cited here. But you're still making claims about me, and the science, that are not true.
Abrupt climate change occurs when the system is forced to cross an "unfamiliar" threshold, one that does not allow the same atmospheric circulation regime to sustain in ability...which means that, if the Solar Cycles do shut down after this cycle, the Earth could either come close to, or surpass the perturbation threshold that has held us in the Holocene interglacial.
So, I predict that, depending on what this upcoming minimum turns out to be, will determine whether or not we're going into a simple cool period as seen in the 1970's/1900's, or whether it will be a steady, significant cooling, followed by a plunge into conditions that the system will not recover from, hence the end of the Holocene.