posted on Dec, 4 2012 @ 08:32 AM
Originally posted by MortPenguin
I have to accept your point of view do I?
If you have been proven wrong this badly then it's only good manners to concede. Have you ever taken part in a formal debate?
Every single part of your argument was defeated, I showed that there was indeed terrain, that slight variations do change shadows more than enough to
match the images and that the shadows themselves don't converge on a non flat plane.
Your entire response has been to repeat the same mantra, that you are right because the shadows 'tell you' that something is wrong. Despite this I
thought I'd give it one last go and asked you to draw the shadow lines as accurately as you could per rock, which I would then automatically extend to
show you how you were wrong there too.
So yes, when your point has been so utterly rejected and all your evidence shown to be misleading or inaccurate, you're obliged to concede the
So it is ok for you guys to insult whoever you please but if I get frustrated by this I get reprimanded. I see this site clearly holds biases.
What a joke.
I can say you're being arrogant because that is a description of your behaviour, you're convinced you are right despite all the evidence pointing
against you. That's arrogance.
On the other hand you used a stream of invectives to describe me, not commenting on my behaviour or attitude, just flat out insulting. That's the
edit on 4/12/12 by exponent because: (no reason given)