It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by thetiler
Too many legit whistleblowers,
Originally posted by PsykoOps
Yes I love lro images. Another nail on the HB coffin. They just dismiss them thought because they can't explain them.
Originally posted by cartesia
only about 4 people even figured out which part of the photograph was being referred to by the information in the OP..
Military officials, however, reportedly abandoned the idea, which would have taken place in 1959, because of fears that it would have an adverse effect on the Earth should the explosion fail.
Originally posted by jimmyx
don't see the dust here (actual nasa photos)
for all of you looking for strange inconsistancies....and even more strange similarities, in the different apollo missions..here is the official nasa apollo photo site
Originally posted by Kang69
reply to post by JohnPhoenix
I would also like note that you can see the rovers tracks in the first image.
How come you can see the Rovers tracks here, but not in the images OP linked? It literally looks like the rover was dropped in place.
Fact: Did you know that so far, 14 astronauts have died in Space Shuttle missions that were 200 miles above the Earth, yet during the Apollo program NASA allegedly sent astronauts 240,000 miles to the moon and back six times, with no loss of life? In other words: 200 miles = 14 casualties, 240,000 miles = 0 casualties. Do you buy that? Can you fathom the enormous difference between 200 and 240,000 and how big of a stretch that is?
If the Apollo missions were authentic, then by now, there should be daily flights to the moon as well as moon bases.
6. Identical backdrops with different foregrounds and vanishing LEM Here are two images with the same identical backdrop with totally different foregrounds, as you can see. In one of them, you can see the LEM, but not in the other, which is an oddity since the LEM never moved after allegedly landing on the moon.
Due to there being no atmosphere on the moon to provide convection for heating and cooling, on the daylight side, which all Apollo missions landed on, temperatures are at 250 Fahrenheit and in the shade drop drastically to 250 below zero. Yet the astronauts had no sufficient cooling system, especially with the batteries they had, which were comparable to that of a car. Since the moon atmosphere is in a vacuum, they could not use air convection to cool off. So they would have needed a lot of power to radiate heat away from them, which would have drained what precious battery power they had.
Since the command module with Michael Collins in it was orbiting the moon at 4000mph, how did the LEM dock with it for the journey home? The odds of that succeeding seem astronomically small. No human pilot could navigate a dock with an object moving at 4000mph. If they had missed, they would have been lost forever. NASA has never explained this.
Furthermore, the excuse given by NASA paid apologists, such as Phil Plait of BadAstronomy.com, about the Hubble Telescope, the world’s most powerful, not being powerful enough to see the Apollo artifacts left on the surface of the moon, simply doesn't hold water, and sounds more like a convenient copout excuse.
Why can you hear the astronauts voices as the lunar lander descended? Its roaring thrusters at high decibels should have made their voices inaudible.
How is it that the LEM was unstable in Earth's atmosphere and kept crashing to the ground during tests, yet worked flawlessly on the moon's surface? You can see video footage of it crashing on Earth just before Neil Armstrong ejects to safety.
Anyone can draw grey lines, even with a pencil. And anyone with the cheapest photo editing program can create dots and pixels on an image. You can even do it in the free Paint program that comes with Microsoft Windows.
Now, some in the UFO research community have argued that mankind did go to the moon, but found alien artifacts there, or something else they could not show the public, and so had to fake the videos and photos. This is often used as a “backup explanation” to explain the Apollo fakeries, yet still maintain the pride of America having made it to the moon.