Where did all the jobs go?, page 1


Pages: <<  1    2  >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 4 times
Topic started on 25-11-2012 @ 01:29 AM by alumnathe
This is something I show in my sociology class when the issue of employment trends comes up. Notice how you are learning this (with a click), and compare to how you would have learned it 40 years ago, if at all:

1971


2009

edit on Sun Nov 25 2012 by DontTreadOnMe because: Starting a New Thread?...Look Here FirstAboveTopSecret.com takes pride in making every post count. Please do not create minimal posts to start your new thread.If you feel inclined to make the board aware of news, current events, or important information from other sitesplease post one or two paragraphs, a link to the entire story, AND your opinion, twist or take on the news item, as a means to inspire discussion or collaborative research on your subject.
edit on Sun Nov 25 2012 by DontTreadOnMe because: ALL CAPS in title



reply posted on 25-11-2012 @ 01:50 AM by randomtangentsrme
reply to post by alumnathe



Exactly right. Automation and computers have contributed far more than most want to talk about to the loss of jobs.
The only solution I see is to lower the hours in a full time work week.


reply posted on 25-11-2012 @ 02:10 AM by alumnathe
reply to post by randomtangentsrme



That's a band-aid. It's going to take a change of perspective on what "convenience" means. Is it "convenient" to be able to pay Walmart prices if the trade-off is lack of American jobs? What happens to "quality" in the current arrangement? If you really fear socialism, then stop supporting those who hire to diminish quality in favor of quantity. If you are buying for quantity instead of quality, then you are perpetuating socialism. It's that simple.


reply posted on 25-11-2012 @ 02:25 AM by randomtangentsrme
Originally posted by alumnathe
reply to
post by randomtangentsrme



That's a band-aid. It's going to take a change of perspective on what "convenience" means. Is it "convenient" to be able to pay Walmart prices if the trade-off is lack of American jobs? What happens to "quality" in the current arrangement? If you really fear socialism, then stop supporting those who hire to diminish quality in favor of quantity. If you are buying for quantity instead of quality, then you are perpetuating socialism. It's that simple.


You have wrongly extrapolated quite a bit from my simple post.
I don't shop at wal-mart
What I do not or cannot build myself, I buy for quality.
I do not fear socialism. Why fear an idea and failed experiments of said idea?
Nowhere in my post do I bring up convenience.

How is lowering the full time work week a band-aid?
Right now we have corporations giving salaried employes 60 hour work weeks, because they can. We have corporations only hiring part time employees to avoid paying benefits.
If you have the answers, I'm all ears.


reply posted on 25-11-2012 @ 03:12 AM by alumnathe
reply to post by hawkiye



You sound reasonable about this and so I encourage you to go find the stats on how automation rates compare to number of jobs that have (not) been created to maintain the automation. The glorious scary thing about getting machines to do the work is that they don't need health insurance, family days off, or competitive wages. Eventually it becomes clear that teaching the machines to maintain other machines is a lot more "cost effective" than hiring and maintaining human labor. This is not something that happened during one or two presidencies. It has been evolving for a century.


reply posted on 25-11-2012 @ 03:47 AM by Honor93
reply to post by alumnathe


hey, thanks for the reminder ... i saw 1971 and thought about this building's completion, the boom the steel biz was and how quickly it dissolved and went overseas ... heck, a majority of ATS posters weren't even born yet

it really doesn't surprise me that they do not understand as they should.
they cannot understand that which they do not know. (and aren't taught)


reply posted on 25-11-2012 @ 04:11 AM by hawkiye
reply to post by alumnathe



I have no doubt automation is a factor but we don't manufacture much here anymore and I am sure what is manufactured is more automated then in the 70s. But the fact remains most manufacturing has gone over seas and we even complain about workers over there getting slave wages. And most of those jobs are manual so how would it be if we brought them all back home? I don't think that is taken into account and it's hard to make a comparison now days with the manufacturing base gone from the US. To say production is better today then in the 70's with less workers is apples and oranges since the manufacturing base is gone unlike in the 70s when it was at its peak. That just does not tell the whole story when you look at it logically.

I did a little research and can find articles pro and con but neither take into consideration these differences. if you can find something that does I am always open.



edit on 25-11-2012 by hawkiye because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 25-11-2012 @ 04:12 AM by Perhaps
reply to post by alumnathe



China, and other low-cost labor nations... sure, automation has played a role, yet outsourcing abroad would be a larger contributor.



reply posted on 25-11-2012 @ 09:42 AM by JohnnyCanuck
Originally posted by Perhaps
reply to
post by alumnathe

China, and other low-cost labor nations... sure, automation has played a role, yet outsourcing abroad would be a larger contributor.
Bingo! Years ago, I noted that you could land a pair of Nikes in Vancouver for $9...and they'd retail for over a hundred. Don't know what the current figures are but the argument remains the same...where does the difference go? Why, Bay Street/Wall Street - you get the picture. How about real taxation on the movement of money?


reply posted on 25-11-2012 @ 10:59 AM by JohnPhoenix
Wow I call BS on this thread.

All the jobs have not gone. Especially not to automation. The Ops pictures above are Silly. They show a handful of auto workers on the factory floor then show robots doing those jobs claiming that robots stole the jobs. Silly people. It took many more people to make those robots - thus many more jobs. Hardware, software, technicians/troubleshooters etc.

The false perception is that jobs are scarce due to the amount of people applying for unemployment. This is not true indicator of how many jobs are out there. There are TONS of Jobs in America !!!!

Most of those saps on unemployment can go out Today and get a job. ( and today is Sunday) The problem is no one wants to WORK. They all want specialist jobs they had been trained for but those jobs change with the technological climate and are never guaranteed to be there forever. People should know this when getting into certain fields.

I know construction, plumbing, air conditioning, heating - and heck lawn cutting, landscaping, digging ditches and a ton more skills (many of which are easily learned for little money ) and I can fall back on them anytime of year to make ends meet. Anyone else can too. here's a Tip. Home Depo teaches you skills for FREE.

Hey America, Get off your fat lazy butts and go out and get to work!

Who do I blame the high rate of unemployment on? I blame the stupid people who are using up the resources in the system by applying for unemployment. Silly people. the People, not the Jobs are the problem.

Unemployment is only supposed to be used by those with extreme circumstances where they cannot possible get work at all. This would be a very small percent of people on unemployment now. If everyone would stop using up the government resources and get off their butts and work our economy would be way better off, but no.. people don't want to learn multiple skills or do any real work for a living. People want to be college trained flunkies who stick with a certain job the rest of their life with promises of 401 K's and a fat retirement plan. If they cant get that or get fired from that they cry to the government and say, You have to help us because we cant work in our chosen job anymore. Boo hoo cry me a river. No wonder the economy is in the trash, the American people don't want to work.

I haven't worked for anyone in over ten years and yet I still go out and work to pay my bills. Would I collect unemployment? ( I could be approved) Nope, no sponging off the government for me when I an able bodied and can do for myself.

You give me ANY able bodied person and I can get them work and a skill ASAP. Any takers?
edit on 25-11-2012 by JohnPhoenix because: sp



reply posted on 25-11-2012 @ 11:22 AM by Quauhtli
reply to post by JohnPhoenix



Your jump at the chance to call people on unemployment saps discredits everything that you say. Try adding something with substance next time if you are going to participate.

It is lucky for you that you have gained all of these skills. There is something to be said for those who take the time to learn how to work in multiple fields instead of specializing, especially in these times. There is still something more to be said for those who learn to be self sufficient. But your lack of empathy for those who have not had the luxury of having been raised by these standards shows your lack of skill in yet other equally important aspects of life and community. You may yet have to depend on these folks one day to survive and blasting them down now does nothing to further your own further success.


reply posted on 25-11-2012 @ 11:24 AM by Jerk_Idiot
reply to post by randomtangentsrme


I believe Obama has, from a 40hr wk to a 30hr wk being considered full time. What is needed is for the pay to reflect a 40hr wk when you are working 30. Or you can have my job and work almost continually. They have few people capable of the job and most that can handle it burn out from the OT like me. They will not LET you work a 40hr wk. anymore.


reply posted on 25-11-2012 @ 11:28 AM by Jerk_Idiot
reply to post by alumnathe


Actually these days they do not really "repair" so much as replace. Black box operation. No need for knowledge so why pay for it?
Pages: <<  1    2  >>    ^^TOP^^



A Really Sad Picture That I Saw Today, Left Me Speechless
  Posted 12 days ago with 148 member flags
Fact Check: First Lady\'s False Fairy Tale of Struggle
  Posted 6 days ago with 81 member flags
Coal miners say they were forced to attend Romney event and donate
  Posted 14 days ago with 71 member flags
Stephen King\'s Message
  Posted 10 days ago with 71 member flags
Paul Ryan Exposes Elite Agenda, "Shut Up" Says Banker
  Posted 10 days ago with 40 member flags