It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Wide-Eyes
reply to post by psikeyhackr
I think most 'truthers' have pretty much got bored with even debating 911 now. It will never lead anywhere so what's the point. I just accept that it was a sham and nothing can be done to prove it.
Originally posted by Wide-Eyes
reply to post by psikeyhackr
Good point, the problem has always been that people add their own twist on what they think happened. If all truthers had just said 'that defies physics, wtf?', then we would probably have a better argument over the years.
Unfortunately, too many talked of holograms, fake planes and high intensity energy weapons from space. Thus tainting the whole movement.
Originally posted by Wide-Eyes
reply to post by psikeyhackr
I think most 'truthers' have pretty much got bored with even debating 911 now. It will never lead anywhere so what's the point. I just accept that it was a sham and nothing can be done to prove it.
Originally posted by bacci0909
reply to post by psikeyhackr
Meanwhile I'm sitting here with my father-in-law watching videos of JFKs assassination, pondering the truth. Can't help but think this will be me with my son-in-law in 40 years.. what a shame
Originally posted by psikeyhackr
Originally posted by Wide-Eyes
reply to post by psikeyhackr
I think most 'truthers' have pretty much got bored with even debating 911 now. It will never lead anywhere so what's the point. I just accept that it was a sham and nothing can be done to prove it.
Too many so called "Truthers" talk about conspiracies and the government instead of physics.
From that standpoint it is almost funny. But from that standpoint it is even more ridiculous and culturally significant. From now on academics need to keep people ignorant of physics while at the same time talking about STEM education. ROFL
Originally posted by Wide-Eyes
reply to post by truthermantwo
You're being sarcastic? Or serious? You got a link?
Originally posted by R0CR13
When I first heard of Judy Woods theory I LOL ..
I'm not laughing anymore .
Originally posted by Wide-Eyes
reply to post by psikeyhackr
As for 9/11 truth being dangerous. It's dangerous to the JREF forum because if all the truthers give up, the JREFers will have nothing to talk about but bigfoot and the forum will fail.
Originally posted by Wide-Eyes
JREF = 9/11 debunkers and bigfoot. That's pretty much it...
Hope I get a 'stundie' for this! That would be funny.
I never thought this day would come, Psikey, but I agree with you! There was one firefighter's association (forgot which one) who was upset over this very issue. They wanted the steel to be tested because if fires had the ability to bring down buildings in the way it did we sure as shootin' need to know more about it. For one thing, all the formulas and calculations on how much fireproofing structural steel will require to protect it might be totally wrong, and if that's the case, it means other buildings might be waiting to have this happen to them, too
And sorry but your post just isn't stupid enough to rate a stundie. It's just run-of-the-mill, plain vanilla
Originally posted by thedman
reply to post by GoodOlDave
I never thought this day would come, Psikey, but I agree with you! There was one firefighter's association (forgot which one) who was upset over this very issue. They wanted the steel to be tested because if fires had the ability to bring down buildings in the way it did we sure as shootin' need to know more about it. For one thing, all the formulas and calculations on how much fireproofing structural steel will require to protect it might be totally wrong, and if that's the case, it means other buildings might be waiting to have this happen to them, too
It was Bill Manning at FIRE ENGINEERING magazine who was upset that the FEMA report failed to go into
what he (and some others) felt was the substandard nature of the fireproofing applied to the beams in WTC
Felt this was a critical element in why and how the WTC folded on Sept 11
Truthers like to refer to this - doubt any of them actually read it and understood what it meant.....