It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Are YOU claiming the US governement adds 120B a month to the deficit?
Originally posted by Mike.Ockizard
reply to post by xuenchen
read through this thread and can say that the OP has lost the argument. Funny, he seems to always lose the argument! Sounding more and more like a GOP plant trying to spread dis-info. Better check in with your sponsors OP, the GOP is shifting its position on this issue and they are moving away from you.
Eliminating Bush Tax Cuts Would Barely Cover October Deficit,
Originally posted by borracho
Ok, say i am running a business that turns millions in profit and I usually draw most of that as my income. Once the tax cuts expire that income would be taxed at a higher rate after say $2 milion a year. In that case it would make more sense as a business man to not pull those funds as personal income but reinvest it back into my company in order to avoid the additional taxes. That would have the effect of growing my business through research and development, or increased advertising, or maybe I could exploit tax incentives for employee benefits to avoid those taxes. That last one could be better healthcare, or higher wages, you name it. That would in turn put more expendable income in the hands of people who are most likely to spend it. Our economy needs that in order to grow. The ultra rich do not spen any of the money they save on tax cuts, they just move it to oversees bank accounts. That money is removed from our economy and rarely makes it back. Let the rich pay the tax, they use most of the resources. They use our police departments to protect their businesses, our courts to enforce contracts, our military to protect their shipping lanes and international investments. In return for all that and more, they hide their money, avoid taxes, and tell us that it is our fault and it is our patriotic duty to pay our taxes, and die in their wars. .
Originally posted by spinalremain
Who expects to pay the deficit with expiring the Bush cuts for the wealthy?
Your entire thread is based on a premise that doesn't exist.
Did Obama say that this will erase the deficit and I missed it? Did Harry Reid say it and I missed it?
Perhaps the president would like the cuts to expire for the wealthy so that more of the burden would be taken off the largest consuming group in the country? The group that our economy revolves around. The middle class.
You know, the one's beneathe you because they fly coach. The ones who swing hammers for a living or fix your roof.
Originally posted by neo96
reply to post by xuenchen
Eliminating Bush Tax Cuts Would Barely Cover October Deficit,
The current administration knoiws this but doesn't care, and those who support it doesn't care the only thing they care about is making those evil rich pay.
Originally posted by spinalremain
reply to post by camaro68ss
The wealthy pay 30%
Now I do not have to pay 35%
Now I can afford to better educate my son and buy more groceries.
The wealthy entitlements have not created jobs. It's been proven non effective. No more debate is even necessary.
The wealthy entitlements have not created jobs. It's been proven non effective. No more debate is even necessary.
Originally posted by camaro68ss
Originally posted by spinalremain
reply to post by camaro68ss
The wealthy pay 30%
Now I do not have to pay 35%
Now I can afford to better educate my son and buy more groceries.
The wealthy entitlements have not created jobs. It's been proven non effective. No more debate is even necessary.
um.... top tax braket right now is 35%
if your middle class your tax braket is at 25% or 28% depending on your income. they already pay more then you.
Using your logic, lower the riches tax braket and they too can now buy more groceries and goods..or are they too rich and it doesnt work that way?
edit on 15-11-2012 by camaro68ss because: (no reason given)