It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by neo96
So does raising taxes on the rich pay down the debt?
Nope all it does it prop up already bad spending habits which is the first part of the BS second part of that BS is your cutting spending there is no need to raise taxes.
But hey why let common sense enter in to the coversation GO ON TAKE EVERY CENT OF THOSE EVIL RICH!!!
GO ON!
As if it is going to fix anything but keep an already bloated government more "fat" as in those DC fat cats. I an honestly sick to death the tax stupidity, and it is stupidity.
Abolish the freaking income tax and never let it be heard from agian that way it can not be used as a wedge issue to "win elections".
Taxing the rich is far from a solution for our debt. But it does help..
Originally posted by Swills
reply to post by Aloysius the Gaul
Cut the debt by how many trillion? I'd love to see the actual plan for that.
But whether such a plan exists and is actually feasible doesn't matter because they clearly are not following that plan.
So with that, no matter what plan you've read that may work probably won't because 1) they won't implement it because 2) they constantly spend spend print borrow spend.
Washington DC is incapable of solving this debt problem. Washington DC is the reason we have this debt problem.
Originally posted by neo96
reply to post by mr10k
Taxing the rich is far from a solution for our debt. But it does help..
No it doesn't the simple fact a minority is paying for that majority who is going around saying tax the rich just not me:
Those people who are taking more out of that system than paying in to that which is why they are going around saying tax someone the rich just not them.
If those programs were solvent in the first place of which they are no where near even close to being there is absolutely no reason to tax that minority one cent.
Originally posted by sheepslayer247
This is very concerning to me. I have been hearing a lot of people on the Right begin to change their tune, as I'm sure many of you have heard as well, but the tax issue was one that I never thought I would see them bend on.
Why would they even begin to "compromise" on the tax issue if trickle-down economics was such a great economic driver?
Either they are not as fervent in their beliefs as we thought, or even they know trickle-down is the biggest lie ever perpetuated on the American people and are beginning to switch the party rhetoric for political purposes.edit on 11-11-2012 by sheepslayer247 because: (no reason given)
The PEOPLE know that the Conservatives and republicans are FULL OF BALONEY, and NOW the conservative and republicans KNOW that they must CHANGE THEIR TUNE FAST or risk fading out completely
Originally posted by badgerprints
They don't want a tax hike because Obama won't tell them where it's going.
No budget for three years.
I wouldn't want a tax hike either.
How about we start at the beginning.
A budget.
Originally posted by neo96
reply to post by oper8zhin
The PEOPLE know that the Conservatives and republicans are FULL OF BALONEY, and NOW the conservative and republicans KNOW that they must CHANGE THEIR TUNE FAST or risk fading out completely
If that were true the House would have changed control but it didn't then there is the fact the current potus lost 8+ million votes in the last election.edit on 11-11-2012 by neo96 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by neo96
reply to post by oper8zhin
The PEOPLE know that the Conservatives and republicans are FULL OF BALONEY, and NOW the conservative and republicans KNOW that they must CHANGE THEIR TUNE FAST or risk fading out completely
If that were true the House would have changed control but it didn't then there is the fact the current potus lost 8+ million votes in the last election.edit on 11-11-2012 by neo96 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by neo96
reply to post by sheepslayer247
Makes perfect sense to those of us who are in the corn belt nothing but a bunch of RINOS pandering to try to "save face".
Same problem they had in 2008 same problem they had this year trying to be something they are not what Bill Crystal and all the other pundits should do is just go join the democratic party.
Republican In Name Only is a pejorative term that refers to a member of the Republican Party of the United States whose political views or actions are considered insufficiently conservative or otherwise conforming to liberal positions. The acronym RINO, emerging in the 1990s, is a charge used in campaigns by Republican conservatives against party moderates and liberals.