Christianity and Abortion, page 14

Pages: << 11 12 13 14 >>
ATS Members have flagged this thread 20 times

reply posted on 13-11-2012 @ 05:50 PM by Quadrivium

Originally posted by PurpleChiten
reply to post by Quadrivium

Is she removing human life or is she preventing human life....there's the rub.

Where is the rub?
Perhaps you would like to go into just a wee bit more detail................
I doubt it though, I have not sen you add much content to your own thread other than trolling.
Prove me wrong by expanding on your above statement.

reply posted on 13-11-2012 @ 05:54 PM by Annee

Originally posted by ElectricUniverse

Originally posted by Annee

Guess what - - neither do you. YOU go by your belief - - a belief man has taught you.

NO... It is what SCIENCE through observation has taught us...

Science? You wouldn't use science in your argument unless you found something you agree with.

Science today is based on - - - well money. Who ever pays for it wants the answer they want.

Science - - - is something that can be repetitive tested on Known Knowledge.

Science is always changing - - with new discoveries.

reply posted on 13-11-2012 @ 05:58 PM by PurpleChiten

Originally posted by Quadrivium

Originally posted by PurpleChiten
reply to post by Quadrivium

Is she removing human life or is she preventing human life....there's the rub.

Where is the rub?
Perhaps you would like to go into just a wee bit more detail................
I doubt it though, I have not sen you add much content to your own thread other than trolling.
Prove me wrong by expanding on your above statement.

It's pretty self explanatory ...
trolling??? That would be you, not me, afterall, I DID start the thread, you have only tried to derail it.

reply posted on 13-11-2012 @ 05:59 PM by gnosticagnostic

reply to post by ElectricUniverse

no, it's because your too self-righteous it doesn't matter what anyone says to you... and that's ok to have your belief.. I choose not to waste time and energy discussing a topic in which one refuses to see both sides of the issue .. it has no point and goes in a circle. I can say that I respect others opinions whether they respect mine or not.

reply posted on 13-11-2012 @ 06:01 PM by Angle

To kill you children is murder.

reply posted on 13-11-2012 @ 06:02 PM by Annee

Originally posted by otherpotato
reply to post by Zinky

If I could give you a gajillion stars I would. Thank you for saying what needed to be said. I got your back over here.

Star for both of you.

And my back too

reply posted on 13-11-2012 @ 06:02 PM by Bone75

Originally posted by PurpleChiten
Apparently, the question they won't tell us about has something to do with whether or not there was a surgery or not (of course they can't just state the question, that would be silly )

IF that is the question, his answer would be no. He didn't have surgery, his mother had surgery when she was pregnant with him. For him to have had surgery, he would have been the patient, he wasn't the patient, his mother was.

Technically, every single person in the world could say they had surgery if we counted things like that since the umbilical cord is cut on birth (making them a self-sustaining person as opposed to being part of their mother).

Until that cord is cut, he didn't have surgery, his mother did.

So his mother had surgery to repair her spina bifida?

reply posted on 13-11-2012 @ 06:06 PM by Annee

Originally posted by PurpleChiten

It's pretty self explanatory ...
trolling??? That would be you, not me, afterall, I DID start the thread, you have only tried to derail it.

Hey - welcome back.

It was getting kind of exhausting with the tag team

reply posted on 13-11-2012 @ 06:10 PM by DontTreadOnMe

Closed.

Bickering is not part of polite debate.

We expect civility and decorum within all topics - Please Review This Link.

edit on Tue Nov 13 2012 by DontTreadOnMe because: speeling