It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Onewhoknowsjesus
[snip]
Originally posted by colin42
The names at this point do not matter. These groups and the networks are what we need to expose.
Like the cells in the French Resistance movement you did not break the underground movement by killing the radio operator. You followed the lines to unearth the network.
savill was known to be a paedo at least by the mid to late 90's. Why was he not pursued then, why wait to act on complaints and accusations until now, well after his death? Oh yeah he can’t talk now can he.
His family took down the headstone almost as the news broke. If my family member was meant to be an angel and after his death I would need to be positive about the truth and their actions indicate this was not news to them
Like a drug pusher on the street corner savill was just the front man and in the end small beer. We need to find who he was supplying and how deep the rabbit hole goes.
You want to see an end to this filth then we need to unearth the web then you will find the spider.
I want to know why
1. The media took so long to take an interest and it still appears they dont want to go past celebs
2. The continued reluctance of the plice to pursue any complaints of this nature
3. Why politicians who were happy to slam the BBC seem reluctant to treat acusations of their group with the same venom
4. Why the emails of all the MP's who passed a bill allowing unfettered access to our emails without permission do not seem to be included.
5. Why do they tell us we must always take seriously what children tell us but they never do.
Originally posted by illuminnaughty
www.telegraph.co.uk...
So Cameron thinks a witch hunt could start over the paedos scandal. Really David? Homosexuals are not paedophiles . Its nothing to do with gays unless they are raping children. Hes trying to muddy the waters in my opinion. Protecting his friends in govt who are involved in this scandal. Full marks for Mr Schofield for giving him the list on morning TV.
Originally posted by lonewolf19792000
Homosexuals are not pedos?
Originally posted by Ferryman
I think David CaMORON is bricking it, and you could tell that by the look on his face during the interview, he went a whiter shade of pale.
This isn’t conspiracy theory, it’s cultural fact. We are playing for big stakes here, and the Establishment knows it. A great many senior public figures could find their career histories dramatically changed….along with their daily place of residence.
Originally posted by VoidHawk
Originally posted by Ferryman
I think David CaMORON is bricking it, and you could tell that by the look on his face during the interview, he went a whiter shade of pale.
I agree, i've watched it closely several times, he was worried, how close to HIM does this get?
By the way, I've often been tempted to spell his name like you have "caMORON" but to be honest, I feel its an insult to the morons.
Originally posted by blupblup
Interesting blog article
This isn’t conspiracy theory, it’s cultural fact. We are playing for big stakes here, and the Establishment knows it. A great many senior public figures could find their career histories dramatically changed….along with their daily place of residence.
hat4uk.wordpress.com...edit on 9/11/12 by blupblup because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by colin42
reply to post by woodwardjnr
I find it very hard to believe that a person raped 20 years ago would not have seen at least one photo of his attacker and now changes his mind when he finally gets the public’s attention. Yep I find it very hard to believe.
I don’t find it hard to believe the government wants to gag the BBC and scare off the others. The name was never mentioned. It was all over the internet and so the action against news night looks excessive
The clamour for names will likely let this mob of the hook. The whitewash is going on in very thick layers.
"After seeing a picture in the past hour of the individual concerned, this [is] not the person I identified by photograph presented to me by the police in the early 1990s, who told me the man in the photograph was Lord McAlpine," he said.
Photographs of men abusing boys in the North Wales paedophile scandal were deliberately destroyed by the authorities, it was revealed today. Sian Griffiths worked for Clwyd Council in the inquiry office on the 1994 Jillings and six years later on the Waterhouse inquiry which looked into the systematic abuse at the children’s homes. She told ITV News that victim Steve Messham’s photos of alleged abuse were ordered to be destroyed.
Steven first publicly named his attacker 15 years ago at the 1997 judicial inquiry into the care scandal, but the Press was barred from reporting his shocking allegation. A second witness is also understood to have named the grandee, but has since disappeared. The third confirmed witness has died. But campaigners say more victims are expected to come forward.