Cameron says people could start a witch hunt for homosexuals.

page: 1
24
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
+1 more 
posted on Nov, 8 2012 @ 11:07 AM
link   
www.telegraph.co.uk...

So Cameron thinks a witch hunt could start over the paedos scandal. Really David? Homosexuals are not paedophiles . Its nothing to do with gays unless they are raping children. Hes trying to muddy the waters in my opinion. Protecting his friends in govt who are involved in this scandal. Full marks for Mr Schofield for giving him the list on morning TV.



+3 more 
posted on Nov, 8 2012 @ 11:16 AM
link   
Perhaps more appropriate is a witch hunt against POLITICIANS.
If the paedo scandal fuels the hunt, so be it.

ganjoa



posted on Nov, 8 2012 @ 11:37 AM
link   
It sounds like he's trying to deflect, and play on the mindset of those who equate gays with child molestors.

How does this...

The Prime Minister sounded a warning as he was handed a list of suspected paedophiles on ITV's This Morning programme.


Equate to this...

He said he is "worried" that it could turn into a witch hunt against famous people who happen to be homosexual.



"It is very, very important that we do everything possible to get to the truth about these matters," he told ITV News. "It's really of huge importance, that’s why I ordered an inquiry back in 1996 and I strongly support what the Home Secretary has announced this week.


Yeah, about like we're going to get to the truth of this...

Federal investigators have identified several dozen Pentagon officials and contractors with high-level security clearances who allegedly purchased and downloaded child pornography, including an undisclosed number who used their government computers to obtain the illegal material, according to investigative reports.

Source



posted on Nov, 8 2012 @ 11:40 AM
link   
Is he really trying to get people to calm down and stop doing whatever they can to get to the bottom of an elite pedobear ring??

Why??



posted on Nov, 8 2012 @ 11:41 AM
link   
what an utter moron cameron is, and so ignorant. i despair for the uk almost as much as i do for the rest of the world.



posted on Nov, 8 2012 @ 11:52 AM
link   
reply to post by kryton
 

It sounds to me like there are more than are being released and he knows it. Perhaps this reaches as high into the Government and officialdom as it first appeared. I'd doubted it at first word, as over-reaction and overstatement seems to be the order of the day all around for media anymore. This however? Hey, the smoke isn't getting thinner...I'd say the smoke indicating a fire somewhere is getting thicker and heat can be felt. There is certainly a fire in there somewhere to be dug out and put out. A whole bunch with powerful names....to listen to it.

Maybe... Oh could it be true? MAYBE....they found one of the threads to unravel the near kiddy porn EMPIRE that seems to exist just beyond the visible internet most folks never move beyond. It's out there though and it's staggering in scope and scale. Hopefully...just maybe...this can be the beginning of the end of that?



posted on Nov, 8 2012 @ 11:54 AM
link   
This is the segment from This Morning.



It's always the quiet ones: didn't really think Schofield had it in him.

Kind of reminds me of Matt Baker on the One Show asking how Cameron sleeps at night.




The homosexuality line on This Morning is pretty baffling. Either Cameron really is some kind of bigot that thinks being gay either equates with paedophilia, possibly a gateway to paedophilia, or it's some bizarre deflection technique.

That said, to b e charitable to Cameron, mob justice is a peculiar thing, compare this to the female paediatrician whose house was attacked during a paedophile scare encouraged by the Sun and the News of the World.



posted on Nov, 8 2012 @ 11:54 AM
link   
reply to post by illuminnaughty
 


Got to say I agree with you 100%.

My immediate reaction when reading about this was that now people will associate peadophilia with homosexuality in general and thus deflecting from the real culprits.

www.bbc.co.uk...

But to add a bit of balance it's got to be said that things do seem to have got a bit out of hand and it seems as if it's open season to accuse anyone of being a serial sex pest or peadophile without having any real evidence at all - and mud sticks - imagine having the stigma of peadophile attached to you whilst being innocent.
edit on 8/11/12 by Freeborn because: Spelling, grammar, clarity etc



posted on Nov, 8 2012 @ 11:59 AM
link   
really? they can?



no but really, I don't think so. Not in the UK, I think they are very much aware of the backwardness of treating a homosexual differently because of his sexual orientation. Not to say discrimination doesn't happen in the UK, but I doubt it is that bad. They don't come off as the "get em" type.



posted on Nov, 8 2012 @ 12:12 PM
link   
reply to post by manykapao
 


This peadophile scandal reaches right inside the corridors of power in the UK.

It has long been suspected that peadophilia was a common practice within certain elements of the Old School Boy Network which includes senior politicians / judiciary / civil servants / police etc.

These are the people who pull Cameron's strings - he will do anything to deflect attention from them onto other's.

To gain some idea of the extent those in power will go to cover up these nefarious goings-on perhaps you should research the Holly Greig case and consider the 100 year closure order on matters relating to the Dunblane shooting or Blair's D-Notice as a result of findings from Operation Ore that suggested links between senior UK politicians and a peaodophile ring and child prostitution and trafficking links.



posted on Nov, 8 2012 @ 12:23 PM
link   
Cameron said that if anyone has any information, that they should tell the police. The children in Wales, who told the police were ignored. The police covered it all up. The main guy who is making these claims. Mr Messham, was raped by police officers and politicians as well as local buisness traders.
Of course Mr Messham says that it was covered up by the masons. Who is the head honcho in the masons? Royal family? Good friends of jimmy so vile. He was Charles mentor and close family friend. Didnt Cameron hold a fete/party for the masons recently? Is he a mason?
Yes Freeborn that case concerning Hollie, really needs investigating. Tony bliar slapped a 100 years veto on it.
edit on 8-11-2012 by illuminnaughty because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 8 2012 @ 12:24 PM
link   
reply to post by Freeborn
 
A slightly different angle that is backed up by stories from other countries.

Homosexuality has been ,was used against people to pressure and blackmail them into doing things they would not normally do. Spying, cover-ups etc.

How much more effective a lever can you have than paedophilia and if it is effective you can bet it was and is used by every government on the planet.

So if cameron wants to stop the wagging tongues lets do something different. Have an open investigation fully in the public eye.

The very thing that did not happen in Wales and allowed these filth to go unpunished and remain active and untouchable.

edit on 8-11-2012 by colin42 because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 8 2012 @ 02:13 PM
link   
Is there no one on this site that can reveal the names on that list from the vidio? I am not able to do it other wise I would.
The way I see it is that he was more worried about the paedrophiles in govt, rather than the abused children. I just dont know how they can cover up for the dirty f*cking paedos in the govt. Max clifford said on vidio, that he covered up for Allan clark in regards to having sex with 2 14yr old girls. Max should be arrested and charged with perverting the course of justice. While they are talking to him about that, lets see what other evidence he has regarding this sick gang of nonces that are in our govt.
edit on 8-11-2012 by illuminnaughty because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 8 2012 @ 02:28 PM
link   
I saw this and thought exactly the same thing. No one that I am aware of has even suggested an association of this nature. There are plenty of female staff of the implicated children's homes involved in this scandal.

I find it pretty scary that HE has chosen to make this association, live on TV, when no one has made that association anywhere else. What is he defending against to justify making this kind of statement?

Having seen him appearing to be incredibly uncomfortable before when talking about gay equality, I am highly suspicious of his motivations here.
edit on 8-11-2012 by detachedindividual because: (no reason given)



posted on Nov, 8 2012 @ 02:51 PM
link   
reply to post by illuminnaughty
 


I know what they might be. They have been discussed on the very long and involved Jimmy Saville thread over at the David Icke forum. (which by the way seems to be going offline rather a lot today!)

Personally I think one of the things that made me and others believe the Savile rumours for years was the sheer number of people from his local area and the hospitals etc. who had tales to tell. Also I think there is at least one gay politician on that list that has not been discussed for years and is just rumoured recently to be involved....that is were I think people should be careful.

As these names have been named by many before (including media and fellow politicians, David Icke etc. ) I can't see how it makes any difference to name them;

Lord Alaister MacAlpine ( involved in Welsh care home scandal)
Sir Peter Morrison (Ex Thatcher aide- again named by a fellow MP as being involved in the Welsh care homes abuse)
Ted Heath (deceased Ex PM of Britain)



posted on Nov, 8 2012 @ 02:58 PM
link   
reply to post by DrHammondStoat
 


Yes I am wiped out by that thread which you are on about. I dont seem to be able to get there now. Every time I go there its off line ect. No doubt being hacked by those paedos in govt. I think this lap top has also been targeted.
That thread is a mind blowing thread 680 odd pages long and full of info. I will try and see if the names are there. If I can get back on.
Thanks anyway m8



posted on Nov, 8 2012 @ 03:04 PM
link   
reply to post by illuminnaughty
 


I know, there are apparently huge numbers of people who normally wouldn't, are logging on to the D. Icke forum which is giving them problems. Could also be a different kind of problem considering you can go there and freely see the names that. May have been on the paper.

i think there is now a shorter 16 page thread on there that names the names if you don't feel like reading through 650 replies


People on the Icke forum have done some very good digging on this whole subject!
edit on 8-11-2012 by DrHammondStoat because: (no reason given)
edit on 8-11-2012 by DrHammondStoat because: Typing on phone!



posted on Nov, 8 2012 @ 03:13 PM
link   
reply to post by illuminnaughty
 




Is there no one on this site that can reveal the names on that list from the vidio?


I have a link to an article that names a good dozen plus politicians / judiciary as paedophiles.

The thing is it contains nothing but rumour and unsubstantiated accusations and personally I'm loathe to accuse anyone directly of paedophilia without having any sort of evidence.

I have no doubt that some politicians / judiciary / civil servants etc are involved in these practices and that there is a cover-up of some sort going on.

Evidence does suggest that Saville was somehow linked, and possibly a few other 'celebrities', and there seems to be an ever increasing amount of evidence to suggest that certain politicians etc were also involved.
And therein lies the predicament - how do we find out the identity of those guilty of these crimes, as we undoubtedly have the right to do so, whilst protecting the innocent from false allegations?



posted on Nov, 8 2012 @ 03:17 PM
link   

Originally posted by detachedindividual
I saw this and thought exactly the same thing. No one that I am aware of has even suggested an association of this nature. There are plenty of female staff of the implicated children's homes involved in this scandal.

I find it pretty scary that HE has chosen to make this association, live on TV, when no one has made that association anywhere else. What is he defending against to justify making this kind of statement?

Having seen him appearing to be incredibly uncomfortable before when talking about gay equality, I am highly suspicious of his motivations here.
edit on 8-11-2012 by detachedindividual because: (no reason given)


Maybe because 2 of the people on the list may be friends/ colleagues of Camerons that also happen to be gay?
Apparently there was a publication called 'scallywag' that named certain politicians in the 1990's.



posted on Nov, 8 2012 @ 03:30 PM
link   
reply to post by Freeborn
 


Surely the police should re - look at those named in connection to the Welsh and Irish (Kincora) Boys homes abuse instead of silencing the victims as they did before.

If brave MP's such as Tom Watson and 'nutjobs' such as David Icke have already named those names after speaking to witnesses, why shouldn' t we discuss them? Afterall, they are not new accusations.

Obviously we shouldn't be pointing the finger at people just based on personal opinion.





top topics
 
24
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join