Moon dust confirmed to be Fly ash waste product from coal power stations (Earth bound!)

Fly ash is the unexplained light moon dust.. We use it for adding to concrete to fill old mine shafts, it is not commonly known to the public. It would have been entirely unknown during the moon hoax period.



The lunar rover shots were filmed in this vacuum chamber,



[img][/img]


One of the reasons we never see an astronauts face is because vacuum chambers are dangerous and the suits could decompress, so only dispensable staff were used to film vacuum chamber shots.






Case closed, when will we go to the moon for real?

Yeah,
That top secret powder that they truck out of coal plants in the wee hours of the morning so nobody sees it.
It all goes to a giant vacuum chamber where actors drive around in moon buggies?
O.K. Case closed.
Good job.

reply to post by rolfharriss



You already brought this up in another thread:


www.abovetopsecret.com...

And it was debunked: you never did give a good answer to the gravity question.

I'm kinda curious where all the enormous Saturn V rockets were flying off to, if not the Moon? There was that part about the return capsules and that's a whole Aircraft carrier full of normal sailors to keep a secret as well if they weren't really recovering those in the ocean?

I probably don't want to ask your theory about the men who died on the pad in an Oxygen fire in the Apollo 1 set up.

It's gone, loads of the lunar rover double speed videos have vanished.

Basically it is just slowed down and filmed in the vacuum chamber.

Fly ash is not secret, but not really familiar to the public in general.

All we need is a vacuum chamber a remote control moon buggy, some fly ash and we have a test!

reply to post by Wrabbit2000


They were killed because they refused to go along with the hoax and this acted as a warning to the other astronauts.

reply to post by rolfharriss

Indeed.... I hate being right sometimes. Shouldn't have asked.

Originally posted by eriktheawful
reply to post by rolfharriss

 

You already brought this up in another thread:


www.abovetopsecret.com...

And it was debunked: you never did give a good answer to the gravity question.

There is no evidence of 1/6th gravity.. Strange the many X2 speed lunar rover youtube vids have vanished! This is part of the consolidation and end of internet freedom coming this December.

reply to post by rolfharriss


not sure if you are serious - but here goes :

1 - during the apollo era - coal fired power stations were more prevelant - so the topic of fly ash would be better known to the public than today - also domestic solid fuel heating was more common than today - so the duty of disposing of the ash would be daily chore for many more people than it is today

2 - the vaccum chamber that you alledge the apollo footage was shot in is the space power facility @ the glenn research centre - it is 30m in diameter - a " working footpring that would be drasticaly reduced by the props / backdrop that your fantasy would require - there is simply not enough room in there to fake even the ` on foot ` EVA missions - never mind the rover ones

case dismissed

Originally posted by rolfharriss
It's gone, loads of the lunar rover double speed videos have vanished.

Basically it is just slowed down and filmed in the vacuum chamber.

Fly ash is not secret, but not really familiar to the public in general.

All we need is a vacuum chamber a remote control moon buggy, some fly ash and we have a test!

First, you would need a very, very large vacuum chamber. The buggies drove around quite a bit.

Next, you need to recreate 1/6 gravity, and "slowing down the video" will not work for that, for many reasons. One being the ballistic trajectory the dust and particles take would not be the same. Two, the movement of the astronauts would not look correct.

Just love how people that don't know physics think that by slowing down a video you can recreate the moon's gravity.......

Do we need to bring the SEQ Bay Pendulum video out again? The one that no Moon Hoaxer has ever been able to debunk?

reply to post by rolfharriss


Didn't see any scientific backing to this.
Any chemical analysis to back this up?

Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
reply to post by rolfharriss

 

Indeed.... I hate being right sometimes. Shouldn't have asked.

Gus Grissom's own son believes his father was murdered, I suspect he has done more research than yourself. He is a commercial aircraft pilot and no conspiracy nut. I am sure he shares his father's bravery and integrity of character so it is worth listening to someone closer to the event who is free to speak out.

Apollo Astronaut Was Murdered, Son Charges
Christopher Ruddy
February 11, 1999

Virgil I. "Gus” Grissom, the astronaut slated to be the first man to walk on the moon, was murdered, his son has charged in the Feb. 16 edition of Star magazine.
In another stunning development, a lead NASA investigator has charged that the agency engaged in a cover-up of the true cause of the catastrophe that killed Grissom and two other astronauts.

archive.newsmax.com

I'm curious, how did you come to these conclusions?

Your argument holds no water at all as you present it.

I could just as easily post some pictures of a manikin with a smashed head and say "this is what they used to fake the JFK assassination"

Originally posted by eriktheawful

Originally posted by rolfharriss
It's gone, loads of the lunar rover double speed videos have vanished.

Basically it is just slowed down and filmed in the vacuum chamber.

Fly ash is not secret, but not really familiar to the public in general.

All we need is a vacuum chamber a remote control moon buggy, some fly ash and we have a test!

First, you would need a very, very large vacuum chamber. The buggies drove around quite a bit.

Next, you need to recreate 1/6 gravity, and "slowing down the video" will not work for that, for many reasons. One being the ballistic trajectory the dust and particles take would not be the same. Two, the movement of the astronauts would not look correct.

Just love how people that don't know physics think that by slowing down a video you can recreate the moon's gravity.......

Do we need to bring the SEQ Bay Pendulum video out again? The one that no Moon Hoaxer has ever been able to debunk?

Is this chamber big enough for you ?

The truth about the moon landings is that they actually did land on the moon but the known astronauts didnt. Watch any apollo mission and if you pay attention you will here and see that the audio from the moon is over dubbed and possibly prerecorded.

I wonder who really was the first man to step on the moon?

reply to post by rolfharriss


No, that chamber is no where near big enough to be driving the lunar buggy around in.

Sorry.

Originally posted by eriktheawful

Originally posted by rolfharriss
It's gone, loads of the lunar rover double speed videos have vanished.

Basically it is just slowed down and filmed in the vacuum chamber.

Fly ash is not secret, but not really familiar to the public in general.

All we need is a vacuum chamber a remote control moon buggy, some fly ash and we have a test!

First, you would need a very, very large vacuum chamber. The buggies drove around quite a bit.

Next, you need to recreate 1/6 gravity, and "slowing down the video" will not work for that, for many reasons. One being the ballistic trajectory the dust and particles take would not be the same. Two, the movement of the astronauts would not look correct.

Just love how people that don't know physics think that by slowing down a video you can recreate the moon's gravity.......

Do we need to bring the SEQ Bay Pendulum video out again? The one that no Moon Hoaxer has ever been able to debunk?

No slowing down the video creates the 'moon' footage it does not accurately display what 1/6th gravity on the moon would actually look like. We have no real footage to compare it to.


Youtube has had a clear out of all that X2 astronaut footage that was so damning

reply to post by rolfharriss


Many have posited the argument that Grissom was murdered, and maybe what happened was tantamount to murder through gross negligence, but there is no evidence that he and the other two unfortunate astronauts were deliberately killed, none other than speculation and suspicion. Just because his son says so doesn't mean it's true.

Originally posted by rolfharriss

Originally posted by eriktheawful

Originally posted by rolfharriss
It's gone, loads of the lunar rover double speed videos have vanished.

Basically it is just slowed down and filmed in the vacuum chamber.

Fly ash is not secret, but not really familiar to the public in general.

All we need is a vacuum chamber a remote control moon buggy, some fly ash and we have a test!

First, you would need a very, very large vacuum chamber. The buggies drove around quite a bit.

Next, you need to recreate 1/6 gravity, and "slowing down the video" will not work for that, for many reasons. One being the ballistic trajectory the dust and particles take would not be the same. Two, the movement of the astronauts would not look correct.

Just love how people that don't know physics think that by slowing down a video you can recreate the moon's gravity.......

Do we need to bring the SEQ Bay Pendulum video out again? The one that no Moon Hoaxer has ever been able to debunk?

No slowing down the video creates the 'moon' footage it does not accurately display what 1/6th gravity on the moon would actually look like. We have no real footage to compare it to.


Youtube has had a clear out of all that X2 astronaut footage that was so damning

edit on 3-11-2012 by rolfharriss because: extra info

We sure do. Even have a video showing someone attempting to replicate 1/6 moon gravity, and it fails, even when speeding up the video.

Watch and learn:

Originally posted by eriktheawful
reply to post by rolfharriss

 

No, that chamber is no where near big enough to be driving the lunar buggy around in.

Sorry.

edit on 3-11-2012 by eriktheawful because: (no reason given)

Yes it is, the buggy never drives far in one shot, it breaks and continues in another shot..