It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Why no video or pictures of this "take over"?
Do people in Houston not have cameras?
Originally posted by roadgravel
I find it hard to believe in a 3 hour long line in early voting.
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
To be safe then, I'd suggest 100 feet from the property line itself if anyone wants to film or record a thing.
Missed that part...apologies, still said anecdotal + Bias/Townhall.com doesn't boost credibility.
Well, thank goodness that wasn't the "best" I could come up with. You seem to have discounted fundemental logic? Why would any organization risk significant legal consequences to sway the vote in a state where Romney leads by +20?? Deep breath...no bias...does that make any sense what-so-ever?
The NAACP does participate in "partisan politics"...so does "Truethevote"...taking money from GOP activists, attending GOP events and founded by a Tea Party head. Confused on what the distinction is?
So you concede that this makes no sense from a strategic standpoint? Then what was the motivation? Either local or national. I am uncertain why you think that the local NAACP would think it possible to turn TX blue and reverse a +20 lead for Romney any more than the national NAACP? I still have to return to the most logical explanation...they were handing out water on a warm day where there were long lines?
Originally posted by Taiyed
Why no video or pictures of this "take over"?
Do people in Houston not have cameras?
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
reply to post by Indigo5
Missed that part...apologies, still said anecdotal + Bias/Townhall.com doesn't boost credibility.
Aside from the fact this source site is conservative and by your definition that brings credibility and accuracy into question by default, you have yet to show a thing they have done or reported here or in the past that is not accurate or where they have falsified a thing.
If they have a record or even a single major instance of badly stretching if not misrepresenting the truth, I'll be the first to state I made a mistake in using them.
might as well be Harry Potter’s invisible Knight Bus, because no one can prove it exists.
The bus has been repeatedly cited by True the Vote, a national group focused on voter fraud. Catherine Engelbrecht, the group’s leader, told a gathering in July about buses carrying dozens of voters showing up at polling places during the recent Wisconsin recall election.
“Magically, all of them needed to register and vote at the same time,” Ms. Engelbrecht said. “Do you think maybe they registered falsely under false pretenses? Probably so.”
Weeks later, another True the Vote representative told a meeting of conservative women about a bus seen at a San Diego polling place in 2010 offloading people “who did not appear to be from this country.”
Officials in both San Diego and Wisconsin said they had no evidence that the buses were real. “It’s so stealthy that no one is ever able to get a picture and no one is able to get a license plate,” said Reid Magney, a spokesman for the Wisconsin agency that oversees elections.In some versions the bus is from an Indian reservation; in others it is full of voters from Chicago or Detroit. “Pick your minority group,” he said.
Originally posted by FreebirdGirl
Originally posted by Taiyed
Why no video or pictures of this "take over"?
Do people in Houston not have cameras?
That's what I've been asking this entire thread. The op claims that friends in the area told him that they witnessed this personally. Did they not call the authorities when they saw this happening? So to be fair to the op am I supposed to believe that a bunch of Tea Party members saw the NAACP commit a crime and chose to blog about it instead of informing the police, sherriff or whoever?
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
reply to post by Taiyed
I guess you missed the part in the op where the NAACP people were *INSIDE THE BUILDING* and handing out water to people in line while helping others to find the front of it. Front....that would be AT the tables of the polling place.
If you're here to pick fights...your welcome to move on...anytime now. It's not even creative anymore.
edit on 5-11-2012 by Wrabbit2000 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Wrabbit2000
reply to post by FreebirdGirl
The OP has answered that...Numerous times....
......and it's your burden to read the thread you're coming back to complain on. If you haven't yet seen the answer for why nothing was or can ever be recorded? You need to re-read replies before adding to the list of questions already answered.....many times now. If I'm not mistaken, it was first answered on page 1 or 2...and a few times since.
Sec. 61.014. USE OF CERTAIN DEVICES.
(a) A person may not use a wireless communication device within 100 feet of a voting
(b) A person may not use any mechanical or electronic means of
recording images or sound within 100 feet of a voting station.
(c) The presiding judge may require a person who violates this
section to turn off the device or to leave the polling place.
(d) This section does not apply to:
(1) an election officer in conducting the officer's official
duties;
(2) the use of election equipment necessary for the conduct of
the election; or
(3) a person who is employed at the location in which a polling
place is located while the person is acting in the course of the
person's employment. station.
Originally posted by Indigo5
Originally posted by bigfatfurrytexan
If the reports of cutting people in line are true, that just makes their intent that much worse. But that seems to be so stupid as to be wholly unbelievable on the surface.
Ironic...that bit might be the answer to the mystery.
The poll lines stretched to a minimum of a 3 hour wait, polls closed at 7pm, those in line are still allowed to vote and were waiting at a minimum until 10pm.
Apparently there are reports that the NAACP was trying to help disabled voters move to the front of the line.
Assistant County Attorney Doug Ray was present and says that the NAACP was straightened out, disabled or not, you can't mess with the line. He also said that their was absolutely NO ELECTIONEERING going on, no talk of Obama etc.
www.chron.com...
Truththevote also claimed in WI that a mystery bus was going to polling booth to polling booth filled with foriegners that were illegally registering and voting, though no one was able to identify or see the mystery bus.
Just not buying it.
I thinik the NAACP had good intentions, but made a mistake in trying to help disabled voters who were waiting 3+ hours in line late at night. The rest is spin and BS IMHO.
Originally posted by Taiyed
Why no video or pictures of this "take over"?
Do people in Houston not have cameras?
Originally posted by roadgravel
I find it hard to believe in a 3 hour long line in early voting.
Sec. 61.003. ELECTIONEERING AND LOITERING NEAR POLLING PLACE PROHIBITED. (a) A person commits an offense if, during the voting period and within 100 feet of an outside door through which a voter may enter the building in which a polling place is located, the person:
(1) loiters; or
(2) electioneers for or against any candidate, measure, or political party.
(b) In this section, "voting period" means the period beginning when the polls open for voting and ending when the polls close or the last voter has voted, whichever is later.
(c) An offense under this section is a Class C misdemeanor.
Sec. 61.006. UNLAWFULLY DIVULGING VOTE. (a) A person commits an offense if the person was in a polling place for any purpose other than voting and knowingly communicates to another person information that the person obtained at the polling place about how a voter has voted.
(b) An offense under this section is a felony of the third degree.
(c) This section does not apply to information presented in an official investigation or other official proceeding in which the information is relevant.
Sec. 61.008. UNLAWFULLY INFLUENCING VOTER. (a) A person commits an offense if the person indicates to a voter in a polling place by word, sign, or gesture how the person desires the voter to vote or not vote.
(b) An offense under this section is a Class B misdemeanor.
Acts 1985, 69th Leg., ch. 211, Sec. 1, eff. Jan. 1, 1986.
Source - Texas State Election Code
Sec. 61.014. USE OF CERTAIN DEVICES. (a) A person may not use a wireless communication device within 100 feet of a voting station.
(b) A person may not use any mechanical or electronic means of recording images or sound within 100 feet of a voting station.
(c) The presiding judge may require a person who violates this section to turn off the device or to leave the polling place.
(d) This section does not apply to:
(1) an election officer in conducting the officer's official duties;
(2) the use of election equipment necessary for the conduct of the election; or
(3) a person who is employed at the location in which a polling place is located while the person is acting in the course of the person's employment.