It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Questions and answers on third presidential debate between Barack Obama and Mitt Romney
WASHINGTON (AP) — Libya. Israel. The Palestinians. Iran. Afghanistan. Pakistan. China. Terrorism.
Think world hotspots. Think hot rhetoric. Watch the third presidential debate Monday night.
The final debate of the 2012 campaign will be about foreign policy, although there's certainly a strong connection between China and the U.S. economy.
Read more: india.nydailynews.com...
Here are questions and answers about the final debate, beginning 9 p.m. EDT and lasting until about 10:30 p.m.
Q. Who gets the first and last word?
A. Romney gets the first response to the opening question and the last closing statement.
Q. Wait a minute. Isn't that unfair?
A. No. The order was decided by separate coin tosses.
Q. Foreign policy can be complicated. Will there be enough time to dig deep into the issues?
A. Yes. The moderator has planned for six 15-minute segments. Each segment begins with a question, followed by two-minute responses for each candidate and discussion facilitated by the moderator.
Q. Who chooses the questions and the topics?
A. The moderator, Bob Schieffer of CBS News.
Q. What are the topics for the six segments?
Con't at link....
Read more: india.nydailynews.com...
Q. Where will the debate be held?
A. In Florida, one of the key battleground states, at Lynn University's theater in Boca Raton.
Q. Obama and Romney did a lot of walking around in the last debate, even circling each other. Will we see that again?
A. No. That was for the town-hall format. The candidates will be seated at the now-familiar, half-moon table owned by the Commission on Presidential Debates.
Q. How many people are watching the debates on television?
A. An estimated 65.6 million viewers watched the second presidential debate on Oct. 16, according to the Nielsen Co. Some 67 million people watched the first debate on Oct. 3.
Q. Is that the total number of debate viewers?
A. No. It doesn't count people watching on the Internet.
Read more: india.nydailynews.com...
Originally posted by KeliOnyx
reply to post by xuenchen
Yeah because he has reasons to really be afraid, Al Quaeda constantly looking for new management. Released CIA reports proving he was telling us what they were telling him about Benghazi. Iran ready to come to the table and talk. War in Iraq over. War in Afghanistan winding down. Has filed more complaints in the WTO over China and it's trade practices than either Clinton or Bush. Vastly improved American image across the world.
So what exactly is it that Mitt could be doing better?
the 3rd debate will be won by both, in the eyes of their faithful followers/supporters their candidate will have the better ideas
unfortunately, both candidates are not the 'lesser of two evils'...both are the decimation of America, a road to austerity, war mongering and the destruction of the value of the Dollar
see:
www.activistpost.com...
snip:
On October 1, 2012, Presidential hopeful Mitt Romney outlined his own version of imperialist American foreign policy before the Virginia Military Institute. What Romney described was, in its goals, no different than that of any other President since JFK.
As was made clear in his speech, the presentation of the mutated Manifest Destiny to be ushered in by Romney would be significantly more open than the “leading from behind” destabilization and coalition-based Obama treachery, as the candidate has clearly stated this on more than one occasion.
Essentially, while Obama has continued and accelerated every disastrous policy of the Bush Administration, Romney has openly announced his intention to do the same. The only difference is that the Romney doctrine will supplant the deceitful, secretive, and treacherous nature of Obama’s foreign policy for a more ham-fisted and brazenly aggressive position.
...
2012 indeed
Originally posted by KeliOnyx
reply to post by xuenchen
The only problem with this is Mitt hasn't actually said what he would do different. Well other than labeling China a currency manipulator, which is the equivalent of a fourth grader telling another fourth grader they have cooties. Everything else he just says "Well I would do the same thing but only better." So it only leaves one to speculate on what a Romney foreign policy would look like. The biggest indicator of that is, look who is advising him on foreign policy. And he has Bush's foreign policy guys advising him. So now the question is do you want a Bush 2.0 foreign policy, or the policy we have now which has restored much of our lost standing with the rest of the world?
Originally posted by KeliOnyx
reply to post by xuenchen
The only problem with this is Mitt hasn't actually said what he would do different. Well other than labeling China a currency manipulator, which is the equivalent of a fourth grader telling another fourth grader they have cooties. Everything else he just says "Well I would do the same thing but only better." So it only leaves one to speculate on what a Romney foreign policy would look like. The biggest indicator of that is, look who is advising him on foreign policy. And he has Bush's foreign policy guys advising him. So now the question is do you want a Bush 2.0 foreign policy, or the policy we have now which has restored much of our lost standing with the rest of the world?