posted on Oct, 6 2012 @ 07:21 PM
reply to post by SerenityAva
Originally posted by SerenityAva
Eh. I'm done. You and whoever else have every right to believe what you wish. In this case to believe that because the child was not in the video, she
was not being made fun of. Only the father and son had something going on with themselves. Who knows? Right?
You have still missed my point. I
have not said that they were not teasing her. I have not said that your conclusions are wrong. I am simply saying that those conclusions are
To be clear about it, I am not singling you out.
This is directed at +/- 95% of the replies within this thread.
[color=FFDFC7]There are many replies within this thread that contain various types of threats towards the accused, and which are based
upon hearsay that is supported only by an extremely minimal amount of details, all of which are inconclusive.
[color=898989](Albeit baseless threats from Mighty Armchair Warriors, but threats nonetheless.)
Are you familiar with the phrase 'Beyond a Reasonable Doubt'?
There is plenty of doubt that still remains after watching this one video, that so many people are overlooking. Most of the people who have replied
within this thread, reached their conclusion and with no doubts whatsoever, after these 3 small details:
Little girl crying.
Daddy saying "This is what happened......"
A separate video clip that may, or may not, have portrayed what Daddy told you.
Just try to find a couple irrefutable facts, before calling up the boys and goin' out for a good ol' fashioned hangin' party.
There are many replies within this thread that are nothing more than a slightly modernized version of this↓
[color=FF7340]HeeeHaw boys! Lil girl was cryin'. That's all I be needin. It mus be troo. Everbudy bring ur bestest ropes, and sum caroseen.
edit on 10/6/12 by BrokenCircles because: (no reason given)