Two things. That's all. Just two things. Call me lazy, I am not sourcing this. There are plenty of sources for what I propose right here in ATS
threads, as well as on many other links. Yes, perhaps I am lazy. Don't want to lost my train of thought--and that right there, train, and the
industrialization implications that go with it. Sorry, burning brain syndrome, in which you have a thought, it fires along synapses, and there is
such a burst of agreement and synchronicity that all supporting evidence affirms while leaving you at the exact same time? Anyone else ever
Having said that, in replying to the post, lots of people post ideas fueling threads without links, etc., and get intelligible responses,
so don't reply with "put down the crack pipe," or "you're tripping, dude," etc... I am not a dude, not smoking crack and not tripping
Now that we have that out of the way, there are two things I would like to discuss, prevalent ideas on this discussion board, need not
look for or use search to find the evidence of all of our meanderings regarding them, with plenty of personal (anecdotal) experience, and research
links, hard and soft science, to back this up, two things that outstrip, trump, and game change (insert your favorite term for what I mean here) every
other thread on conspiracy that exists here.
First: Time. Whether it exists or does not, whatever it is or that you consider that it is (notice that I nod to PERCEPTION here, as it
is penultimate, yet not omniprescent in what I mean). The guts of time, or what we consider it to be, the radioactive decay of particle
matter.....for that is, time-wise what the brightest brains among us have used to judge the passage of events and ordering of them, etc.
And yet, having said that, we can all agree that this is simply still a matter of perception. For if you control:
EMPIRICAL evidence--what is perceived that it is what is SEEN: informs you as to what is "real" and what is "imaginary."
It is really just that simple, isn't it? If I can make you see or not see something, then I can control what you consider to be "true," can I
not? And then If I can control your perception of "time," then I can reset it, spin it, do absolutely anything I want with it, and therefore, totally
define what we consider "reality," can't I?
When I cruise the recent topics, it is always with these two things in mind. IE: We may be repeating things, and there may be some pretending
to experience what one, unique, individual is experiencing, and there may also be others who are TRULY thinking and percieving that they experience
what someone else has already experienced---even just so there will be an agreement that "we are all one," for we have all experienced the same, etc.
and on and on similar in this vein....pretended, induced or otherwise. And that is a whole other thread, for this does happen, is important, but
still in the end, despite real or induced (which at some point ceases to matter, for if you are experiencing that pain, etc., induced or otherwise, it
is still "real" to you at that moment, and so you have suffered it--and by our very definitions, we judge then, that, having been through that, we are
owed something for it, and someone must pay for having done it to us, etc. So we can outline this experiential information as pretended/acted,
real/induced, original..... Under the circumstances I have described, all are possible, and that, again, may be a whole other thread. For many of us
know that we experience manipulation of our minds, yes, but also events which happen to us as discreet units, entities, and our narratives having
experienced that are robbed from us, even as they are induced, to create a whole other life for another--and nanotechnology begs this question: is it
then an AI experience, artificial in nature, and therefore, less "real,"
and judged by a different standard.....
I have outlined some ideas for a discussion. That is all. We all have experience in reading about time slips, etc. and know the
circular pattern of what we perceive as time, here. Take the threads, for instance, about time "slips," and combine them with the threads about dead
celebrities that seem to be alive again. In the comics in the newspaper, you will find comics that allude directly to a "do-over." Hmmmm. Are we
gaining or suffering from this? We can't even discuss that, because we will first be divided by the argument that it didn't happen, or we should
prove it, etc..... Think you will get my drift here.
And then the second: I judge, as an individual, from what my anecdotal and empirical experience is. This is what defines all of us,
what we use to live, to think by, to go by....I was thinking today how the word of God, supposedly cautions us against judging, and yet, every day and
every moment causes us in this life to operate, even for our own safety or our children's (the most defenseless among us), requires we have
discernment, which is nothing less than judgement.
Having said that, if that judgement is informed by a manipulated perception of existence and "reality," and that is subject to control,
then absolutely nothing is rendered valid, is it? Yes, we can try, strive, with the best of our efforts, sobriety, control, etc., to deserve and
perceive what is "true," but in the given quantifiers, nothing would be anymore, would it? And thus, the most defenseless among us would be
subjectified, with no ability for those with the good intentions (and remember, why is it said that hell is paved with those); to protect, without
being made the opposite, even while you strive to be exceptional and protective of innocence?
Do you get this?? Is it not crazy making? For no matter what you do or strive to do, believe, act upon and therefore, protect, with
control of these two things: perception of time, and perception, itself,: we can be made to appear to be anything, absolutely, that whomever is in
control of those things, wishes us to be.......
Thank you for reading.
edit on 27-9-2012 by tetra50 because: (no reason given)
edit on 27-9-2012 by tetra50 because: (no reason
edit on 27-9-2012 by tetra50 because: tabulation for a wall of text, but isn't taking.....hmmmm....what i said above, for if it
comes down to this, then through the filter of this, what is the point????