It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Not only are we seeing the White House and State Department call more attention to the Mohammed-mocking "Innocence of Muslims" than any terrorist network ever could've hoped for, but the President's indefensible scapegoating of the film and filmmaker to draw attention and blame away from U.S. security failures apparently knows no bounds.
Next week, Obama will denounce the film in a speech before the United Nations General Assembly:
National Security Council spokesman Tommy Vietor previews the president's speech to the UN General Assembly next week:
"UNGA always provides an opportunity for the President to put the international situation in context, and to put forward a vision of US leadership. I would certainly expect the President to address the recent unrest in the Muslim world, and the broader context of the democratic transitions in the Arab World."
"As he has in recent days, the President will make it clear that we reject the views in this video, while also underscoring that violence is never acceptable ..............
"As he has in recent days, the President will make it clear that we reject the views in this video, while also underscoring that violence is never acceptable ..............
So Obama will pander to anyone if he thinks it will keep in office.
That film has been on youtube since July and only became and issue to deflect from his failed administration and his failed foriegn policies.
Obama and his supporters will use anything and everything to deflect that is was not a film really irks me that they will gladly get on their knees for appeasement.
If the Republicans,Christians,and Jewish could be so lucky.
The permit covers a one-day shoot for the film, which was then called "Desert Warriors" and has become known as "Innocence of Muslims" since 14 minutes of excerpts were uploaded to YouTube in July.
Originally posted by sheepslayer247
reply to post by neo96
I asked specific questions Neo. Could you please address those specific questions and explain what you would have done differently if you were in that position?
Originally posted by neo96
Originally posted by sheepslayer247
reply to post by neo96
I asked specific questions Neo. Could you please address those specific questions and explain what you would have done differently if you were in that position?
My name is Neo not Obama i don't jump to other peoples tune and do what they want me to..
Originally posted by Jordan River
The death of one, (in this case, jail/prison) is worth the lives of millions
Originally posted by trisvonbis
But of course he will. At least he's got a reason, he is a muslim, one of them.
Hillary on the other side... well, she is just the usual poisonous, monstruous bitch, jealous because nobody would give her the "Levinsky treatment", because she is way too ugly
Originally posted by Xtrozero
BTW what crime did he commit?
edit on 22-9-2012 by Xtrozero because: (no reason given)
How is this politically advantageous for him and how else could he have handled the situation?
Whom is he pandering to and for what reason?
Can you provide some evidence of that?
Appease whom? If they are trying to appease Muslims or other foreign nations, we can all agree that is hasn't worked.
Oh, spare me the drama! The entire US political spectrum is swaying heavily towards the NeoCon Republican Christian agenda and you come on here and whine about their luck?