It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Had he given those packages to the American people it would have been roughly $10,000.00 for every man, woman and child which would have been spent promptly (I guarantee it) and would have actually stimulated the economy as it would have given consumers more spending potential not to mention 300,000,000 possible down payments or avoided foreclosures.
Originally posted by DaMod
reply to post by thepresident
Perhaps people don't want to work at McDonalds instead of acquiring a higher paying skilled labor job.
Of course if creating minimum wage jobs is your idea of "Job Creation" I think you need to step back and check yourself.
Originally posted by CoherentlyConfused
reply to post by DaMod
Had he given those packages to the American people it would have been roughly $10,000.00 for every man, woman and child which would have been spent promptly (I guarantee it) and would have actually stimulated the economy as it would have given consumers more spending potential not to mention 300,000,000 possible down payments or avoided foreclosures.
I was saying that very thing, back when the bailouts first started. I was against them but if I had received a check for 10,000, I woudln't have sent it back. I would have immediately paid off my two credit debts and put the rest towards my second mortgage. So the way I see it, that money would have bailed me out and the money would have ultimately ended up in the bankers' hands anyway. Even if I wasn't responsible and just blew that 10K, it still would have been money back in the economy.
Originally posted by St Udio
If you were to pay attention to last nights 'acceptance speech' by Øbama ... the man used the same words he used in his 2008 speech as a candidate...
" i propose that we the target the Industrial sector to create 1 Million new jobs"
we know how that expansion went....
he Gov't redefined Industrial Work as including the act of 'building a burger' so that putting a slice of cheese on a burger is counted as a factory/industrial process & the person doing that task is considered an Engineer-of-sorts.
Just that kind of crap is why i totally disagree with the Øbama vision of a recovered America... while the term USA is is thrown away by the Øbama administration handlers because the United States is a different animal than the (Federalist) America that the Øbama progressives always focus upon~~ there is a very definite difference between USA & America, you the readers need to understand that Øbama's vision of power/recovery/etc is being directed to his seat of power as the American leader not the leader of the USA which is run by the Congress as the law-makers
One thing of note in the speech last night was the 'suggestion' that the wind-down of the Afghanistan war will lead directly into a major expansion of rebuilding the infrastructure (roads/bridges/runways/etc) Just like he promised in 2008-09...same lame promises being repeated in his 2012 nomination acceptance speech...ho-humm
....didn't the last Øbama 'stimulus' focus on the rebuilding of the infrastructure...and specifically the 'shovel ready projects' to get America to work...
notice that the shovel-ready-projects did not help the USA unemployed
but helped the big businesses to the tune of $800Billion and of course himself...this is a clue as to what he means about helping America...instead of the USA working population
smell the coffee yet ?
perhaps when the schools start teaching ShariaLaws we wll wake up
edit on 7-9-2012 by St Udio because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by crawdad1914
No offense to the OP nor anyone here trying to educate the un-educatable:
Cant believe people are still responding in this thread. The premise of the thread is like something out of the twilight zone.
Originally posted by thepresident
Originally posted by crawdad1914
No offense to the OP nor anyone here trying to educate the un-educatable:
Cant believe people are still responding in this thread. The premise of the thread is like something out of the twilight zone.
Yes, if you will see, the majority of people responded to positive data with negativity.
That is the underlying premise of the thread, sorry you missed it
www.abovetopsecret.com...
Originally posted by thepresident
reply to post by CaptChaos
I was unaware that babies are considered a part of the
Work force. I am happy to find out that people never die
Or retire. Too bad immigrants don't work off if the radar.
edit on 7-9-2012 by thepresident because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by CaptChaos
Originally posted by thepresident
reply to post by CaptChaos
I was unaware that babies are considered a part of the
Work force. I am happy to find out that people never die
Or retire. Too bad immigrants don't work off if the radar.
edit on 7-9-2012 by thepresident because: (no reason given)
You're right. You shouldn't count new people being born. They never grow up and enter the workforce. There are none that were born twenty years ago now unemployed.
Originally posted by thepresident
Originally posted by CaptChaos
Originally posted by thepresident
reply to post by CaptChaos
I was unaware that babies are considered a part of the
Work force. I am happy to find out that people never die
Or retire. Too bad immigrants don't work off if the radar.
edit on 7-9-2012 by thepresident because: (no reason given)
You're right. You shouldn't count new people being born. They never grow up and enter the workforce. There are none that were born twenty years ago now unemployed.
And the economy doesn't fluctuate in the course of 20 years either.
Everything that is going to remain the same for two decades.
It does burn BTW
Originally posted by crawdad1914
Originally posted by thepresident
Originally posted by crawdad1914
No offense to the OP nor anyone here trying to educate the un-educatable:
Cant believe people are still responding in this thread. The premise of the thread is like something out of the twilight zone.
Yes, if you will see, the majority of people responded to positive data with negativity.
That is the underlying premise of the thread, sorry you missed it
www.abovetopsecret.com...
The metaphor "lipstick on a pig" comes to mind. You cant dress it up. Thinking people will react negatively when the assumption is made that they cant see through BS.
Especially such easily refutable BS.
Originally posted by camaro68ss
Originally posted by thepresident
Originally posted by CaptChaos
Originally posted by thepresident
reply to post by CaptChaos
I was unaware that babies are considered a part of the
Work force. I am happy to find out that people never die
Or retire. Too bad immigrants don't work off if the radar.
edit on 7-9-2012 by thepresident because: (no reason given)
You're right. You shouldn't count new people being born. They never grow up and enter the workforce. There are none that were born twenty years ago now unemployed.
And the economy doesn't fluctuate in the course of 20 years either.
Everything that is going to remain the same for two decades.
It does burn BTW
just give up, you lost every argument here and no one has backed you up. Obama economics, aka blow trillions of dollars, is a fail
Originally posted by DaMod
reply to post by thepresident
But see that's what I'm saying (and have been saying since the first stimulus package)
That is really the only way to put the money directly into the economy.. Give it to Americans and let them spend it..
Originally posted by thepresident
Originally posted by camaro68ss
Originally posted by thepresident
Originally posted by CaptChaos
Originally posted by thepresident
reply to post by CaptChaos
I was unaware that babies are considered a part of the
Work force. I am happy to find out that people never die
Or retire. Too bad immigrants don't work off if the radar.
edit on 7-9-2012 by thepresident because: (no reason given)
You're right. You shouldn't count new people being born. They never grow up and enter the workforce. There are none that were born twenty years ago now unemployed.
And the economy doesn't fluctuate in the course of 20 years either.
Everything that is going to remain the same for two decades.
It does burn BTW
just give up, you lost every argument here and no one has backed you up. Obama economics, aka blow trillions of dollars, is a fail
No one has backed me up because nobody wants to mauled
They know exactly what I did and all of you have responded in the most predictable
fashion. Plus most people don't usually design a fight on purpose.
This is not a thread about economics, it is a thread about sociology.
You must protect the negative narrative because it is vital to your desired political whims.
If America were improving it would make your story appear wrong and it would improve
the chances of Obama getting reelected and vindicate "progressivism".
You guys know that and so do I.
Wanna see me do it again?
Originally posted by DaMod
reply to post by thepresident
Man I think you'll find even fewer Romney supporters here than Obama supporters.
I'm pretty sure the general consensus is they are both equally as horrible choices.